Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Explaining AI systems is fundamental both to the development of high performing models and to the trust placed in them by their users.
J. Aas, M. Jullum, and A. Løland · 1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
The many Shapley values for model explanation, 2019
M. Sundararajan and A. Najmi · 1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problem, 2019
D. Janzing, L. Minorics, and P. Blöbaum · 1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
Preserving causal constraints in counterfactual explanations for machine learning classifiers, 2019
D. Mahajan, C. Tan, and A. Sharma · 1912
Earlier work this paper cites.
Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern · 1944
Earlier work this paper cites.
A value for n n -person games
L. S. Shapley · 1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from berkeley
P. J. Bickel, E. A. Hammel, and J. W. O’Connell · 1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
Probabilistic values for games
R. J. Weber · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Causality: models, reasoning and inference
J. Pearl · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Causation, prediction, and search
P. Spirtes, C. N. Glymour, and R. Scheines · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Indications of nonlinear deterministic and finite-dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity: Dependence on recording region and brain state
R. G. Andrzejak, K. Lehnertz, F. Mormann, C. Rieke, P. David, and C. E. Elger · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Random forests
L. Breiman · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Analysis of regression in game theory approach
S. Lipovetsky and M. Conklin · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Variations on the shapley value
D. Monderer and D. Samet · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shapley-based explainability on the data manifold, 2020
C. Frye, D. de Mijolla, L. Cowton, M. Stanley, and I. Feige · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Conditional variable importance for random forests
C. Strobl, A.-L. Boulesteix, T. Kneib, T. Augustin, and A. Zeileis · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
How to explain individual classification decisions
D. Baehrens, T. Schroeter, S. Harmeling, M. Kawanabe, K. Hansen, and K.-R. MÞller · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
An efficient explanation of individual classifications using game theory
I. Kononenko et al · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
An introduction to causal inference
J. Pearl · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Introduction to causal inference
P. Spirtes · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Fairness through awareness
C. Dwork, M. Hardt, T. Pitassi, O. Reingold, and R. Zemel · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Why should I trust you: Explaining the predictions of any classifier
M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
A. Chouldechova · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
UCI machine learning repository, 2017
D. Dua and C. Graff · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Avoiding discrimination through causal reasoning
N. Kilbertus, M. R. Carulla, G. Parascandolo, M. Hardt, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Counterfactual fairness
M. J. Kusner, J. Loftus, C. Russell, and R. Silva · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
R. Zemel, Y. Wu, K. Swersky, T. Pitassi, and C. Dwork · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions
E. Štrumbelj and I. Kononenko · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Censoring representations with an adversary, 2015
H. Edwards and A. Storkey · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Certifying and removing disparate impact
M. Feldman, S. A. Friedler, J. Moeller, C. Scheidegger, and S. Venkatasubramanian · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
D. P. Kingma and J. Ba · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system
T. Chen and C. Guestrin · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning important features through propagating activation differences
A. Shrikumar, P. Greenside, and A. Kundaje · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: The state of the art
R. Berk, H. Heidari, S. Jabbari, M. Kearns, and A. Roth · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
A causal bayesian networks viewpoint on fairness
S. Chiappa and W. S. Isaac · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles, 2018
S. M. Lundberg, G. G. Erion, and S.-I. Lee · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Path-specific counterfactual fairness
S. Chiappa · 2019
Closest in time.
Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models
C. Glymour, K. Zhang, and P. Spirtes · 2019
Closest in time.
Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences
T. Miller · 2019
Closest in time.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
C. Rudin · 2019
Closest in time.