Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
With the widespread use of AI systems and applications in our everyday lives, it is important to take fairness issues into consideration while designing and engineering these types of systems.
Efficient candidate screening under multiple tests and implications for fairness
Lee Cohen, Zachary C. Lipton, and Yishay Mansour. 2019 · 1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coefficient in census tract material
C. E. Gehlke and Katherine Biehl. 1934 · 1934
Earlier work this paper cites.
On Simpson’s paradox and the sure-thing principle
Colin R Blyth. 1972 · 1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
The statistical theory of racism and sexism
Edmund S Phelps. 1972 · 1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
The economics of racial discrimination: A survey
Ray Marshall. 1974 · 1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from Berkeley
Peter J Bickel, Eugene A Hammel, and J William O’Connell. 1975 · 1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
The disparate impact model of discrimination: Theory and limits
Steven L Willborn. 1984 · 1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
EEOC compliance manual
United States. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [n.d.] · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bias in Computer Systems
Batya Friedman and Helen Nissenbaum. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Race, Gender, Redlining, and the Discriminatory Access to Loans, Credit, and Insurance: An Historical and Empirical Analysis of Consumers Who Sued Lenders and Insurers in Federal and State Courts, 1950-1995
Willy E Rice. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Defining the Web: the politics of search engines
L. Introna and H. Nissenbaum. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multi–objective evolutionary algorithms for the risk–return trade–off in bank loan management
Amitabha Mukerjee, Rita Biswas, Kalyanmoy Deb, and Amrit P Mathur. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) . Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, Louisiana, 8–14
Rachel Rudinger, Jason Naradowsky, Brian Leonard, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2018 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reexamining criminal behavior: the importance of omitted variable bias
David B Mustard. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
La reincidencia en el delito en la justicia de menores
Manel Capdevila, Marta Ferrer, and Eulália Luque. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research
Kevin A Clarke. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In MT summit , Vol. 5. 79–86
Philipp Koehn. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
UCI Machine Learning Repository
A. Asuncion and D.J. Newman. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Whose Space? Differences among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites
Eszter Hargittai. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Labeled faces in the wild: A database forstudying face recognition in unconstrained environments
Gary B Huang, Marwan Mattar, Tamara Berg, and Eric Learned-Miller. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Causal inference and omitted variable bias in financial aid research: Assessing solutions
Stephanie K Riegg. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simpson’s paradox in a synthetic microbial system
John S Chuang, Olivier Rivoire, and Stanislas Leibler. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Classifying without discriminating. In 2009 2nd International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication . 1–6
F. Kamiran and T. Calders. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
User interactions in social networks and their implications. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM European conference on Computer systems . Acm, 205–218
Christo Wilson, Bryce Boe, Alessandra Sala, Krishna PN Puttaswamy, and Ben Y Zhao. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification
Toon Calders and Sicco Verwer. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Classification with no discrimination by preferential sampling. In Proc. 19th Machine Learning Conf. Belgium and The Netherlands . Citeseer, 1–6
Faisal Kamiran and Toon Calders. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics
Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions
Shai Danziger, Jonathan Levav, and Liora Avnaim-Pesso. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Communities and crime unnormalized data set
M Redmond. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis
Andrea Romei and Salvatore Ruggieri. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness Through Awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (Cambridge, Massachusetts) (ITCS ’12) . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 214–226
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Methodology for Direct and Indirect Discrimination Prevention in Data Mining
S. Hajian and J. Domingo-Ferrer. 2013 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination
Faisal Kamiran and Toon Calders. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases . Springer, 35–50
Toshihiro Kamishima, Shotaro Akaho, Hideki Asoh, and Jun Sakuma. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms
Lauren A Rivera. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Explainable and Non-explainable Discrimination in Classification
Faisal Kamiran and Indrė Žliobaitė. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simpson’s paradox in psychological science: a practical guide
Rogier Kievit, Willem Eduard Frankenhuis, Lourens Waldorp, and Denny Borsboom. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s firehose. In 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2013 . AAAI press
Fred Morstatter, Jürgen Pfeffer, Huan Liu, and Kathleen M Carley. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
"How old do you think I am?": A study of language and age in Twitter. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2013 . AAAI Press, 439–448
Dong-Phuong Nguyen, Rilana Gravel, Rudolf Berend Trieschnigg, and Theo Meder. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks
Sandra González-Bailón, Ning Wang, Alejandro Rivero, Javier Borge-Holthoefer, and Yamir Moreno. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Leveraging position bias to improve peer recommendation
Kristina Lerman and Tad Hogg. 2014a · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Leveraging position bias to improve peer recommendation
Kristina Lerman and Tad Hogg. 2014b · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
Zeynep Tufekci. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Enhancing Minority Participation in Clinical Trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual
Selwyn Vickers, Mona Fouad, and Moon S Chen Jr. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why Amazon’s ratings might mislead you: The story of herding effects
Ting Wang and Dashun Wang. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Sydney, NSW, Australia) (KDD ’15) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 259–268
Michael Feldman, Sorelle A. Friedler, John Moeller, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Race and social equity: A nervous area of government
Susan T Gooden. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, et al · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness constraints: Mechanisms for fair classification
Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine Bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica 2016
Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Averaging Gone Wrong: Using Time-Aware Analyses to Better Understand Behavior
Samuel Barbosa, Dan Cosley, Amit Sharma, and Roberto M. Cesar-Jr. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. In Advances in neural information processing systems . 4349–4357
Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T Kalai. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
The case for process fairness in learning: Feature selection for fair decision making. In NIPS Symposium on Machine Learning and the Law , Vol. 1. 2
Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Krishna P Gummadi, and Adrian Weller. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems . 3315–3323
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, Nati Srebro, et al · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Jon Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Compas analysis
J Larson, S Mattu, L Kirchner, and J Angwin. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
THE VARIATIONAL FAIR AUTOENCODER
Christos Louizos, Kevin Swersky, Yujia Li, Max Welling, and Richard Zemel. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities
Arjun K. Manrai, Birgit H. Funke, Heidi L. Rehm, Morten S. Olesen, Bradley A. Maron, Peter Szolovits, David M. Margulies, Joseph Loscalzo, and Isaac S. Kohane. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning
Blake Lemoine, Brian Zhang, and M Mitchell. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Computational social scientist beware: Simpson’s paradox in behavioral data
Kristina Lerman. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning
Lydia T Liu, Sarah Dean, Esther Rolf, Max Simchowitz, and Moritz Hardt. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Causal reasoning for algorithmic fairness
Joshua R Loftus, Chris Russell, Matt J Kusner, and Ricardo Silva. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
The cost of fairness in binary classification. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 81) , Sorelle A. Friedler and Christo Wilson (Eds.). PMLR, New York, NY, USA, 107–118
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
“Blissfully Happy” or “Ready toFight”: Varying Interpretations of Emoji. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Hannah Jean Miller, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Social data: Biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries
Alexandra Olteanu, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Emre Kiciman. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
Cathy O’Neil. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Causal discrimination discovery through propensity score analysis
Bilal Qureshi, Faisal Kamiran, Asim Karim, and Salvatore Ruggieri. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluation. In International Conference on Machine Learning . 1670–1679
Tobias Schnabel, Adith Swaminathan, Ashudeep Singh, Navin Chandak, and Thorsten Joachims. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A Convex Framework for Fair Regression
Richard Berk, Hoda Heidari, Shahin Jabbari, Matthew Joseph, Michael Kearns, Jamie Morgenstern, Seth Neel, and Aaron Roth. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Aylin Caliskan, Joanna J Bryson, and Arvind Narayanan. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Aditya Krishna Menon and Robert C Williamson. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Invariant Representations without Adversarial Training. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems . 9084–9093
Daniel Moyer, Shuyang Gao, Rob Brekelmans, Aram Galstyan, and Greg Ver Steeg. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Learning Optimal Fair Policies
Razieh Nabi, Daniel Malinsky, and Ilya Shpitser. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Fair inference on outcomes. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Razieh Nabi and Ilya Shpitser. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Assessing gender bias in machine translation: a case study with Google Translate
Marcelo OR Prates, Pedro H Avelar, and Luís C Lamb. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkit
Pedro Saleiro, Benedict Kuester, Abby Stevens, Ari Anisfeld, Loren Hinkson, Jesse London, and Rayid Ghani. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
The Price of Fair PCA: One Extra Dimension. In Proceedings of the 32Nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Montréal, Canada) (NIPS’18) . Curran Associates Inc., USA, 10999–11010
Samira Samadi, Uthaipon Tantipongpipat, Jamie Morgenstern, Mohit Singh, and Santosh Vempala. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Getting gender right in neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing . 3003–3008
Eva Vanmassenhove, Christian Hardmeier, and Andy Way. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness definitions explained. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Fairness (FairWare) . IEEE, 1–7
Sahil Verma and Julia Rubin. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness-aware Classification: Criterion, Convexity, and Bounds
Yongkai Wu, Lu Zhang, and Xintao Wu. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Fairgan: Fairness-aware generative adversarial networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) . IEEE, 570–575
Depeng Xu, Shuhan Yuan, Lu Zhang, and Xintao Wu. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Causal Modeling-Based Discrimination Discovery and Removal: Criteria, Bounds, and Algorithms
L. Zhang, Y. Wu, and X. Wu. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing . 4847–4853
Jieyu Zhao, Yichao Zhou, Zeyu Li, Wei Wang, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2018b · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
AI can be sexist and racist it’s time to make it fair
James Zou and Londa Schiebinger. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-Based Algorithms. In International Conference on Machine Learning . 120–129
Alekh Agarwal, Miroslav Dudik, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Learning optimal and fair decision trees for non-discriminative decision-making. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 33. 1418–1426
Sina Aghaei, Mohammad Javad Azizi, and Phebe Vayanos. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Uncovering and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias through Learned Latent Structure
Alexander Amini, Ava Soleimany, Wilko Schwarting, Sangeeta Bhatia, and Daniela Rus. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Scalable Fair Clustering. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 97) , Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov (Eds.). PMLR, Long Beach, California, USA, 405–413
Arturs Backurs, Piotr Indyk, Krzysztof Onak, Baruch Schieber, Ali Vakilian, and Tal Wagner. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop . 7–15
Shikha Bordia and Samuel Bowman. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Compositional Fairness Constraints for Graph Embeddings. In International Conference on Machine Learning . 715–724
Avishek Bose and William Hamilton. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddings. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 97) , Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov (Eds.). PMLR, Long Beach, California, USA, 803–811
Marc-Etienne Brunet, Colleen Alkalay-Houlihan, Ashton Anderson, and Richard Zemel. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Path-specific Counterfactual Fairness. In Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence . 7801–7808
S. Chiappa. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglement. In International Conference on Machine Learning . 1436–1445
Elliot Creager, David Madras, Joern-Henrik Jacobsen, Marissa Weis, Kevin Swersky, Toniann Pitassi, and Richard Zemel. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniques
Joel Escudé Font and Marta R Costa-jussà. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Hila Gonen and Yoav Goldberg. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Stable and Fair Classification. In International Conference on Machine Learning . 2879–2890
Lingxiao Huang and Nisheeth Vishnoi. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
50 Years of Test (Un) fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . ACM, 49–58
Ben Hutchinson and Margaret Mitchell. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
An empirical study of rich subgroup fairness for machine learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . ACM, 100–109
Michael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
On measuring social biases in sentence encoders
Chandler May, Alex Wang, Shikha Bordia, Samuel R Bowman, and Rachel Rudinger. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Man is to Person as Woman is to Location: Measuring Gender Bias in Named Entity Recognition
Ninareh Mehrabi, Thamme Gowda, Fred Morstatter, Nanyun Peng, and Aram Galstyan. 2019a · 2019
Closest in time.
Debiasing Community Detection: The Importance of Lowly-Connected Nodes
Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter, Nanyun Peng, and Aram Galstyan. 2019b · 2019
Closest in time.
Michele Merler, Nalini Ratha, Rogerio S Feris, and John R Smith. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Yule-Simpson’s paradox in Galactic Archaeology
I Minchev, G Matijevic, DW Hogg, G Guiglion, M Steinmetz, F Anders, C Chiappini, M Martig, A Queiroz, and C Scannapieco. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Model Cards for Model Reporting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Atlanta, GA, USA) (FAT* ’19) . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 220–229
Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Taking advantage of multitask learning for fair classification. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 227–237
Luca Oneto, Michele Doninini, Amon Elders, and Massimiliano Pontil. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial ai products
Inioluwa Deborah Raji and Joy Buolamwini. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Perceptions of Fairness. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Honolulu, HI, USA) (AIES ’19) . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 537–538
Nripsuta Ani Saxena. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
How Do Fairness Definitions Fare?: Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairness. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . ACM, 99–106
Nripsuta Ani Saxena, Karen Huang, Evan DeFilippis, Goran Radanovic, David C Parkes, and Yang Liu. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . ACM, 59–68
Andrew D Selbst, Danah Boyd, Sorelle A Friedler, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, and Janet Vertesi. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
A Framework for Understanding Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning
Harini Suresh and John V Guttag. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Why Machine Learning May Lead to Unfairness: Evidence from Risk Assessment for Juvenile Justice in Catalonia
Songül Tolan, Marius Miron, Emilia Gómez, and Carlos Castillo. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Fairness without Harm: Decoupled Classifiers with Preference Guarantees. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 97) , Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov (Eds.). PMLR, Long Beach, California, USA, 6373–6382
Berk Ustun, Yang Liu, and David Parkes. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Can AI Help Reduce Disparities in General Medical and Mental Health Care?
Irene Y Chen, Peter Szolovits, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) . 629–634
Jieyu Zhao, Tianlu Wang, Mark Yatskar, Ryan Cotterell, Vicente Ordonez, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
A Geometric Solution to Fair Representations. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 279–285
Yuzi He, Keith Burghardt, and Kristina Lerman. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Statistical Equity: A Fairness Classification Objective
Ninareh Mehrabi, Yuzhong Huang, and Fred Morstatter. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Attributing Fair Decisions with Attention Interventions
Ninareh Mehrabi, Umang Gupta, Fred Morstatter, Greg Ver Steeg, and Aram Galstyan. 2021a · 2021
Closest in time.
Lawyers are Dishonest? Quantifying Representational Harms in Commonsense Knowledge Resources. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing . Association for Computational Linguistics, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 5016–5033
Ninareh Mehrabi, Pei Zhou, Fred Morstatter, Jay Pujara, Xiang Ren, and Aram Galstyan. 2021b · 2021
Closest in time.