Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We examine the problem of determining whether a multi-qubit two-local Hamiltonian can be made stoquastic by single-qubit unitary transformations.
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, “Sign problem in the numerical simulation of many-electron systems,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 41, pp. 9301–9307, May 1990. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.9301
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Hatano and M. Suzuki, “Representation basis in quantum Monte Carlo calculations and the negative-sign problem,” Physics Letters A , vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 246–249, 1992. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(92)91006-D
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Suzuki, Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Condensed Matter Physics . WORLD SCIENTIFIC, dec 1993. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/2262
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Berman and R. Plemmons, Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences . Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1994. [Online]. Available: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9781611971262
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. F. Bishop and D. J. J. Farnell, “Marshall-Peierls sign rules, the quantum Monte Carlo method, and frustration,” in Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories , vol. 15. World Scientific, 2000, pp. 457–460. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812792754_0052
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics . New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2005
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bravyi, A. J. Bessen, and B. M. Terhal, “Merlin-Arthur games and stoquastic complexity,” arXiv:quant-ph/0611021 , 2006. [Online]. Available: http://arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0611021
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Werner, A. Comanac, L. de’ Medici, M. Troyer, and A. J. Millis, “Continuous-time solver for quantum impurity models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 97, p. 076405, Aug 2006. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.076405
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Aharonov, W. van Dam, J. Kempe, Z. Landau, S. Lloyd, and O. Regev, “Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation,” SIAM J. Comput. , vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 166–194, Jan. 2007. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0097539705447323
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Bravyi, D. P. Divincenzo, R. Oliveira, and B. M. Terhal, “The complexity of stoquastic local hamiltonian problems,” Quantum Info. Comput. , vol. 8, no. 5, p. 361–385, May 2008. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2011772.2011773
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
J. D. Biamonte and P. J. Love, “Realizable Hamiltonians for universal adiabatic quantum computers,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 78, p. 012352, Jul 2008. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012352
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Bravyi and B. Terhal, “Complexity of stoquastic frustration-free Hamiltonians,” SIAM Journal on Computing , vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1462–1485, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/08072689X
L. Hormozi, E. W. Brown, G. Carleo, and M. Troyer, “Nonstoquastic Hamiltonians and quantum annealing of an Ising spin glass,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 95, p. 184416, May 2017. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.184416
2017
Later among the works it cites.
H. Nishimori and K. Takada, “Exponential enhancement of the efficiency of quantum annealing by non-stoquastic Hamiltonians,” Frontiers in ICT , vol. 4, p. 2, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fict.2017.00002
2017
Later among the works it cites.
J. Bringewatt, W. Dorland, S. P. Jordan, and A. Mink, “Diffusion monte carlo approach versus adiabatic computation for local hamiltonians,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 97, p. 022323, Feb 2018. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022323
2018
Later among the works it cites.
J. Bausch and E. Crosson, “Analysis and limitations of modified circuit-to-Hamiltonian constructions,” Quantum , vol. 2, p. 94, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-09-19-94
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Troyer, “Lecture notes, Boulder school computational and conceptual approaches to quantum many-body systems, 2010,” http://boulderschool.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/QMC_ED.pdf
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Chandrasekharan, “Fermion bag approach to lattice field theories,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 82, p. 025007, Jul 2010. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.025007
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
M. B. Hastings, “Obstructions to classically simulating the quantum adiabatic algorithm,” Quantum Info. Comput. , vol. 13, no. 11–12, p. 1038–1076, Nov. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2535639.2535647
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Jarret, S. P. Jordan, and B. Lackey, “Adiabatic optimization versus diffusion monte carlo methods,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 94, p. 042318, Oct 2016. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.042318
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Cubitt and A. Montanaro, “Complexity classification of local Hamiltonian problems,” SIAM Journal on Computing , vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 268–316, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/140998287
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
M. B. Hastings, “How quantum are non-negative wavefunctions?” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 57, no. 1, p. 015210, jan 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4936216
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Ringel and D. L. Kovrizhin, “Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity,” Science Advances , vol. 3, no. 9, p. e1701758, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701758
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Vinci and D. A. Lidar, “Non-stoquastic Hamiltonians in quantum annealing via geometric phases,” npj Quant. Inf. , vol. 3, no. 1, p. 38, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-017-0037-z
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, “Adiabatic quantum computation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 90, p. 015002, Jan 2018. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015002
2018
Later among the works it cites.
D. Aharonov and A. B. Grilo, “Stoquastic pcp vs. randomness,” 2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) , pp. 1000–1023, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8948612
2019
Closest in time.
M. Marvian, D. A. Lidar, and I. Hen, “On the computational complexity of curing non-stoquastic Hamiltonians,” Nature Communications , 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09501-6
2019
Closest in time.
I. Hen, “Resolution of the sign problem for a frustrated triplet of spins,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 99, p. 033306, Mar 2019. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.033306
2019
Closest in time.
J. Klassen and B. M. Terhal, “Two-local qubit Hamiltonians: when are they stoquastic?” Quantum , vol. 3, p. 139, May 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-05-06-139
2019
Closest in time.
T. Albash, “Role of nonstoquastic catalysts in quantum adiabatic optimization,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 99, p. 042334, Apr 2019. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.042334
2019
Closest in time.
M. Ioannou, “Stoquastic Hamiltonians and the Monte Carlo sign problem,” Ph.D. dissertation, LMU Munich, 2019, supervision by Prof. B.M. Terhal
2019
Closest in time.
I. Ozfidan et al. , “Demonstration of a nonstoquastic hamiltonian in coupled superconducting flux qubits,” Phys. Rev. Applied , vol. 13, p. 034037, Mar 2020. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.034037
2020
Closest in time.