Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition

Journal of Women’s Health

Carr PL, Szalacha L, Barnett R, Caswell C, Inui T (2003) A” ton of feathers”: gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it · 2003

Earlier work this paper cites.

Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head

2005

Earlier work this paper cites.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Kelly CD, Jennions MD (2006) The h index and career assessment by numbers · 2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

Journal of Informetrics

Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD (2007) Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis · 2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

Journal of the american society for information science and technology

Meho LI, Yang K (2007) Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of lis faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar · 2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

Journal of computer-mediated communication

Halavais A, Lackaff D (2008) An analysis of topical coverage of wikipedia · 2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Nosek BA, et al. (2009) National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement · 2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

BMJ open

Head MG, Fitchett JR, Cooke MK, Wurie FB, Atun R (2013) Differences in research funding for women scientists: a systematic comparison of uk investments in global infectious disease research during 1997–2010 · 2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

International Journal of Communication

Reagle J, Rhue L (2011) Gender bias in wikipedia and britannica · 2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Kousha K, Thelwall M, Rezaie S (2011) Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus · 2011

Cited alongside, same era.

American Economic Review

Greenstein S, Zhu F (2012) Is wikipedia biased? · 2012

Cited alongside, same era.

Pollack E (2013) Why Are There Still So Few Women in Science?

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

PloS one

Hill BM, Shaw A (2013) The wikipedia gender gap revisited: Characterizing survey response bias with propensity score estimation · 2013

Cited alongside, same era.

Scientometrics

Harzing AW (2013) A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners · 2013

Cited alongside, same era.

PLoS ONE

Clancy KBH, Nelson RG, Rutherford JN, Hinde K (2014) Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE): Trainees Report Harassment and Assault · 2014

Cited alongside, same era.

Royal Society Open Science

García-Gavilanes R, Tsvetkova M, Yasseri T (2016) Dynamics and biases of online attention: the case of aircraft crashes · 2016

Later among the works it cites.

(International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee), pp. 53–54

Original

Karimi F, Wagner C, Lemmerich F, Jadidi M, Strohmaier M (2016) Inferring gender from names on the web: A comparative evaluation of gender detection methods in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web · 2016

Later among the works it cites.

Science advances

García-Gavilanes R, Mollgaard A, Tsvetkova M, Yasseri T (2017) The memory remains: Understanding collective memory in the digital age · 2017

Later among the works it cites.

(ACM), p. 19

Halfaker A (2017) Interpolating quality dynamics in wikipedia and demonstrating the keilana effect in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration · 2017

Later among the works it cites.

Devlin H (2018) Academic writes 270 Wikipedia pages in a year to get female scientists noticed

2018

Later among the works it cites.