Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
When creating benchmarks for SAT solvers, we need SAT instances that are easy to build but hard to solve.
The complexity of theorem-proving procedures
Stephen A. Cook · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reducibility among combinatorial problems
Richard M. Karp · 1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
The complexity of satisfiability problems
Thomas J. Schaefer · 1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
Where the really hard problems are
Peter C. Cheeseman, Bob Kanefsky, and William M. Taylor · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Duncan J. Watts and Steven H. Strogatz · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Formal models of heavy-tailed behavior in combinatorial search
Hubie Chen, Carla P. Gomes, and Bart Selman · 2001
Cited alongside, same era.
Threshold values of random K -sat from the cavity method
Stephan Mertens, Marc Mézard, and Riccardo Zecchina · 2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Tractable triangles
Martin C. Cooper and Stanislav Zivny · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
The international SAT solver competitions
Matti Järvisalo, Daniel Le Berre, Olivier Roussel, and Laurent Simon · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 4, Fascicle 6: Satisfiability
Donald E. Knuth · 2015
Later among the works it cites.
Weakening cardinality constraints creates harder satisfiability benchmarks
Ivor T. A. Spence · 2015
Later among the works it cites.
Balanced random SAT benchmarks
Ivor Spence · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
CaDiCaL, Lingeling, Plingeling, Treengeling and YalSAT Entering the SAT Competition 2018
Armin Biere · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…