Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2019

Device-independent tests of structures of measurement incompatibility

Quintino, Marco Túlio, Budroni, Costantino, Woodhead, Erik et al.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

In contrast with classical physics, in quantum physics some sets of measurements are incompatible in the sense that they can not be performed simultaneously.

Among other applications, incompatibility allows for contextuality and Bell nonlocality.
This makes of crucial importance developing tools for certifying whether a set of measurements posses a certain structure of incompatibility.
Here we show that, for quantum or nonsignaling models, if the measurements employed in a Bell test satisfy a given type of compatibility, then the amount of violation of some specific Bell inequalities become limited.

Device-independent tests of structures of measurement incompatibility · Around

Built on

P. Skrzypczyk, I. Šupić, and D. Cavalcanti, “All Sets of Incompatible Measurements give an Advantage in Quantum State Discrimination,” Phys. Rev. Lett
Original
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,” Physics
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett
1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. M. Pearle, “Hidden-Variable Example Based upon Data Rejection,” Phys. Rev. D
1970
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. S. Cirel’son, “Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality,” Lett. Math. Phys
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Froissart, “Constructive generalization of Bell’s inequalities,” Nuovo Cimento B
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Fine, “Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities,” Phys. Rev. Lett
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983
K. Kraus, A. Böhm, J. D. Dollard, and W. H. Wootters, eds., States, Effects, and Operations Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory: Lectures in Mathematical Physics at the University of Texas at Austin , vol. 190 of Lecture Notes in Physics · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Kruszyński and W. M. de Muynck, “Compatibility of observables represented by positive operator-valued measures,” J. Math. Phys
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, “Wringing out better Bell inequalities,” Ann. Phys
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Gisin, “Bell’s inequality holds for all non-product states,” Phys. Lett. A
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. S. Tsirelson, “Some results and problems on quantum Bell-type inequalities,” Hadronic Journal Supplement
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Acín, D. Bruß, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, “Classification of Mixed Three-Qubit States,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum cryptography,” Rev. Mod. Phys
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Śliwa, “Symmetries of the Bell correlation inequalities,” Phys. Lett. A
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cambridge University Press, 2004
S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Collins and N. Gisin, “A relevant two qubit Bell inequality inequivalent to the CHSH inequality,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and V. Scarani, “Entanglement and non-locality are different resources,” New J. Phys
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Acín, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Pironio, and V. Scarani, “Device-Independent Security of Quantum Cryptography against Collective Attacks,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C. Doherty, “Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Heinosaari, D. Reitzner, and P. Stano, “Notes on Joint Measurability of Quantum Observables,” Found. Phys
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, “A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations,” New J. Phys
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and C. Fernandez, “Measurements Incompatible in Quantum Theory Cannot Be Measured Jointly in Any Other No-Signaling Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett
Original
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2009
N. Gisin, “Bell Inequalities: Many Questions, a Few Answers,” in Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle: Essays in Honour of Abner Shimony · 2009

Then

C. Bamps and S. Pironio, “Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like inequalities and their application to self-testing,” Phys. Rev. A
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
A. Acín and L. Masanes, “Certified randomness in quantum physics,” Nature (London)
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
D. Cavalcanti and P. Skrzypczyk, “Quantitative relations between measurement incompatibility, quantum steering, and nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. A
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
S.-L. Chen, C. Budroni, Y.-C. Liang, and Y.-N. Chen, “Natural Framework for Device-Independent Quantification of Quantum Steerability, Measurement Incompatibility, and Self-Testing,” Phys. Rev. Lett
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Cited alongside, same era.

E. G. Cavalcanti, S. J. Jones, H. M. Wiseman, and M. D. Reid, “Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Phys. Rev. A

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

Y.-C. Liang, R. W. Spekkens, and H. M. Wiseman, “Specker’s parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity,” Phys. Rep

2011

Cited alongside, same era.

Springer US, 2012

M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, “SDP Relaxations for Non-Commutative Polynomial Optimization,” in Handbook on Semidefinite, Conic and Polynomial Optimization · 2012

Cited alongside, same era.

M. T. Quintino, T. Vértesi, and N. Brunner, “Joint Measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Bell Nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Lett

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

R. Uola, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, “Joint Measurability of Generalized Measurements Implies Classicality,” Phys. Rev. Lett

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, “Bell nonlocality,” Rev. Mod. Phys

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

R. Kunjwal, C. Heunen, and T. Fritz, “Quantum realization of arbitrary joint measurability structures,” Phys. Rev. A

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

M. T. Quintino, J. Bowles, F. Hirsch, and N. Brunner, “Incompatible quantum measurements admitting a local-hidden-variable model,” Phys. Rev. A

2016

Later among the works it cites.

A. Acín, S. Pironio, T. Vértesi, and P. Wittek, “Optimal randomness certification from one entangled bit,” Phys. Rev. A

2016

Later among the works it cites.

D. Cavalcanti and P. Skrzypczyk, “Quantum steering: a review with focus on semidefinite programming,” Rep. Prog. Phys

2016

Later among the works it cites.

T. Heinosaari, T. Miyadera, and M. Ziman, “An invitation to quantum incompatibility,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor

2016

Later among the works it cites.

J. Kiukas, C. Budroni, R. Uola, and J.-P. Pellonpää, “Continuous-variable steering and incompatibility via state-channel duality,” Phys. Rev. A

2017

Later among the works it cites.

SpringerBriefs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2018

B. Amaral and M. T. Cunha, On Graph Approaches to Contextuality and their Role in Quantum Theory · 2018

Later among the works it cites.

S.-L. Chen, C. Budroni, Y.-C. Liang, and Y.-N. Chen, “Exploring the framework of assemblage moment matrices and its applications in device-independent characterizations,” Phys. Rev. A

2018

Later among the works it cites.

F. Hirsch, M. T. Quintino, and N. Brunner, “Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. A

2018

Later among the works it cites.

E. Bene and T. Vértesi, “Measurement incompatibility does not give rise to Bell violation in general,” New Journal of Physics

2018

Later among the works it cites.

E. Woodhead, B. Bourdoncle, and A. Acín, “Randomness versus nonlocality in the Mermin-Bell experiment with three parties,” Quantum

2018

Later among the works it cites.

C. Carmeli, T. Heinosaari, and A. Toigo, “Quantum Incompatibility Witnesses,” Phys. Rev. Lett

2019

Closest in time.

R. Uola, T. Kraft, J. Shang, X.-D. Yu, and O. Gühne, “Quantifying Quantum Resources with Conic Programming,” Phys. Rev. Lett

2019

Closest in time.

Z.-P. Xu and A. Cabello, “Necessary and sufficient condition for contextuality from incompatibility,” Phys. Rev. A

2019

Closest in time.

Y.-C. Liang and Y. Zhang, “Bounding the Plausibility of Physical Theories in a Device-Independent Setting via Hypothesis Testing,” Entropy

2019

Closest in time.