Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The observation of quantum nonlocality, i.e.
J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physics
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett
1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lecture notes in physics. Springer-Verlag, 1983
K. Kraus, A. Bohm, J. Dollard, and W. Wootters, States, effects, and operations: fundamental notions of quantum theory · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. A. Khalfin and B. S. Tsirelson, “Quantum and quasi-classical analogs of Bell inequalities,” Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Kruszyski and W. de Muynck, “Compatibility of observables represented by positive operator-valued measures,” Journal of mathematical physics
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. F. Werner, “Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model,” Phys. Rev. A
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
No. v. 2 in Environmental Engineering. Springer, 1996
P. Busch, P. Lahti, and P. Mittelstaedt, The Quantum Theory of Measurement · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Peres, “Separability Criterion for Density Matrices,” Phys. Rev. Lett
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, “Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions,” Phys. Lett. A
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cambridge Series on Information and the Natural Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 2000
M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Barrett, “Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality,” Phys. Rev. A
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Andersson, S. M. Barnett, and A. Aspect, “Joint measurements of spin, operational locality, and uncertainty,” Phys. Rev. A
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Son, E. Andersson, S. M. Barnett, and M. S. Kim, “Joint measurements and Bell inequalities,” Phys. Rev. A
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Mauro D’Ariano, P. Lo Presti, and P. Perinotti, “Classical randomness in quantum measurements,” Journal of Physics A Mathematical General
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Acín, N. Gisin, and B. Toner, “Grothendieck’s constant and local models for noisy entangled quantum states,” Phys. Rev. A
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C. Doherty, “Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. L. Almeida, S. Pironio, J. Barrett, G. Tóth, and A. Acín, “Noise Robustness of the Nonlocality of Entangled Quantum States,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, “Bell nonlocality,” Reviews of Modern Physics
2014
Later among the works it cites.
R. Uola, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, “Joint Measurability of Generalized Measurements Implies Classicality,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2014
Later among the works it cites.
M. T. Quintino, T. Vértesi, and N. Brunner, “Joint Measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Bell Nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2014
Later among the works it cites.
R. Augusiak, M. Demianowicz, and A. Acín, “Local hidden–variable models for entangled quantum states,” J. Phys. A 42
2014
Later among the works it cites.
R. Kunjwal, C. Heunen, and T. Fritz, “All joint measurability structures are quantum realizable,” Phys. Rev. A 89
2014
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
T. Heinosaari, D. Reitzner, and P. Stano, “Notes on Joint Measurability of Quantum Observables,” Foundations of Physics
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and C. Fernandez, “Measurements Incompatible in Quantum Theory Cannot Be Measured Jointly in Any Other No-Signaling Theory,” Physical Review Letters
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Oppenheim and S. Wehner, “The Uncertainty Principle Determines the Nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics,” Science
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Y.-C. Liang, R. W. Spekkens, and H. M. Wiseman, “Specker’s parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity,” Phys. Rep
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Pfister and S. Wehner, “An information-theoretic principle implies that any discrete physical theory is classical,” Nature Communications
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Hirsch, M. T. Quintino, J. Bowles, and N. Brunner, “Genuine Hidden Quantum Nonlocality,” Physical Review Letters
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
One could also consider a simpler question, where both Alice and Bob use the same set of measurements. In this case, however, the problem is much easier, and examples of incompatible sets not leading to Bell violation can be found in Ref. [ 16 ]
Cited in the paper.
M. T. Quintino, T. Vértesi, D. Cavalcanti, R. Augusiak, M. Demianowicz, A. Acín, and N. Brunner, “Inequivalence of entanglement, steering, and Bell nonlocality for general measurements,” Phys. Rev. A
2015
Closest in time.
R. Uola, C. Budroni, O. Gühne, and J.-P. Pellonpää, “A one-to-one mapping between steering and joint measurability problems,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2015
Closest in time.
T. Heinosaari, J. Kiukas, D. Reitzner, and J. Schultz, “Incompatibility breaking quantum channels,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48
2015
Closest in time.
M. Banik, “Measurement incompatibility and Schrödinger-Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in a class of probabilistic theories,” Journal of Mathematical Physics
2015
Closest in time.
J. Bowles, F. Hirsch, M. T. Quintino, and N. Brunner, “Local Hidden Variable Models for Entangled Quantum States Using Finite Shared Randomness,” Physical Review Letters
2015
Closest in time.
J. Bowles, F. Hirsch, M. T. Quintino, and N. Brunner, “Sufficient criterion for guaranteeing that a two-qubit state is unsteerable,” Phys. Rev. A 93
2016
Closest in time.