Built on

Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, \jnl
Original
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.0201
Original
LSST Science Collaboration, Abell, P. A., Allison, J., et al. 2009, ArXiv e-prints · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

Jones, R. L., Yoachim, P., Chandrasekharan, S., et al. 2014, in \jnl
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Jones, R. L., Slater, C. T., Moeyens, J., et al. 2018, Icarus, 303, 181, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.11.033
2017
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.04058
Original
LSST Science Collaboration, Marshall, P., Anguita, T., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Newton, O., Cautun, M., Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., & Helly, J. C. 2018, \jnl
2018
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2018

A Big Sky Approach to Cadence Diplomacy

Olsen, Knut, Di Criscienzo, Marcella, Jones, R. Lynne et al.

Understand

The LSST survey was designed to deliver transformative results for four primary objectives: constraining dark energy and dark matter, taking an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and mapping the Milky Way.

While the LSST Wide-Fast-Deep survey and accompanying Deep Drilling and mini-surveys will be ground-breaking for each of these areas, there remain competing demands on the survey area, depth, and temporal coverage amid a desire to maximize all three.
In this white paper, we seek to address a principal source of tension between the different LSST science collaborations, that of the survey area and depth that they each need in the parts of the sky that they care about.
We present simple tools which can be used to explore trades between the area surveyed by LSST and the number of visits available per field and then use these tools to propose a change to the baseline survey strategy.