Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Consistently checking the statistical significance of experimental results is one of the mandatory methodological steps to address the so-called "reproducibility crisis" in deep reinforcement learning.
Welch, B. L., 1947. The generalization ofstudent’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34 (1/2), 28–35
1947
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rice, W. R., 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43 (1), 223–225
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cabin, R. J., Mitchell, R. J., 2000. To bonferroni or not to bonferroni: when and how are the questions. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 81 (3), 246–248
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Dhariwal, P., Hesse, C., Klimov, O., Nichol, A., Plappert, M., Radford, A., Schulman, J., Sidor, S., Wu, Y., 2017. Openai baselines. https://github.com/openai/baselines
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Islam, R., Henderson, P., Gomrokchi, M., Precup, D., 2017. Reproducibility of benchmarked deep reinforcement learning tasks for continuous control. In: Proceedings of the ICML 2017 workshop on Reproducibility in Machine Learning (RML)
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2017
Later among the works it cites.
2017
Later among the works it cites.
2017
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…