Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) is a top-tier annual conference in machine learning.
A comparison of ranking and rating procedures for value system measurement
William L Rankin and Joel W Grube · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
A test of the form-resistant correlation hypothesis: Ratings, rankings, and the measurement of values
Jon A Krosnick and Duane F Alwin · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Graph drawing by force-directed placement
T. Fruchterman and E. Reingold · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ranking or rating? some data and their implications for the measurement of evaluative response
Philip A Russell and Colin D Gray · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions
Kaiping Peng, Richard E Nisbett, and Nancy YC Wong · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
The modern theory of consumer behavior: Ordinal or cardinal?
W. Barnett · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Absolute identification by relative judgment
N. Stewart, G. Brown, and N. Chater · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts’ probabilities
A O’Hagan, C Buck, A Daneshkhah, J Eiser, P Garthwaite, D Jenkinson, J Oakley, and T Rakow · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems
R. Olfati-Saber, J. A. Fax, and R. Murray · 2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Statistical properties of community structure in large social and information networks
J. Leskovec, K. Lang, A. Dasgupta, and M. Mahoney · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
Rating versus ranking: What is the best way to reduce response and language bias in cross-national research?
Anne-Wil Harzing, Joyce Baldueza, Wilhelm Barner-Rasmussen, Cordula Barzantny, Anne Canabal, Anabella Davila, Alvaro Espejo, Rita Ferreira, Axele Giroud, Kathrin Koester, et al · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Telescope time without tears: a distributed approach to peer review
M. Merrifield and D. Saari · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
The toronto paper matching system: an automated paper-reviewer assignment system
Laurent Charlin and Richard Zemel · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Tensor spectral clustering for partitioning higher-order network structures
A. R. Benson, D. F. Gleich, and J. Leskovec · 2015
Later among the works it cites.
A Bayesian analysis of peer reviewing
A. Somerville · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
The NIPS Experiment
N. Lawrence and C. Cortes · 2017
Closest in time.
The NIPS experiment
E. Price · 2017
Closest in time.
Juxtapeer: Comparative peer review yields higher quality feedback and promotes deeper reflection
Julia Cambre, Scott Klemmer, and Chinmay Kulkarni · 2018
Closest in time.
Getting Involved in the Peer Review Process
A. Janet Tomiyama · 2018
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
On peer review in computer science: Analysis of its effectiveness and suggestions for improvement
Azzurra Ragone, Katsiaryna Mirylenka, Fabio Casati, and Maurizio Marchese · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Want a grant? First review someone else’s proposal
J. Mervis · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Estimation from pairwise comparisons: Sharp minimax bounds with topology dependence
N. B Shah, S. Balakrishnan, J. Bradley, A. Parekh, K. Ramchandran, and M. J Wainwright
Cited in the paper.
Stochastically transitive models for pairwise comparisons: Statistical and computational issues
N. B. Shah, S. Balakrishnan, A. Guntuboyina, and M. J. Wainwright
Cited in the paper.
Rachel Toor · 2018
Closest in time.