Reconsidering the One Leptoquark solution: flavor anomalies and neutrino mass

R. Gauld, F. Goertz and U. Haisch, On minimal Z ′ Z^{\prime} explanations of the B → K ∗ ​ μ + ​ μ − B\to K^{*}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} anomaly , Phys. Rev. D89

Original

1959

Earlier work this paper cites.

W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Constraints on SU(5) Type Leptoquarks , Phys. Lett. B177

1986

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. Djouadi, T. Kohler, M. Spira and J. Tutas, (e b), (e t) type leptoquarks at e p collider , Z. Phys. C46

1990

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Misiak, The b → s ​ e + ​ e − b\to se^{+}e^{-} and b → s ​ γ b\to s\gamma decays with next-to-leading logarithmic QCD corrections , Nucl. Phys. B393

1993

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. Davidson, D. C. Bailey and B. A. Campbell, Model independent constraints on leptoquarks from rare processes , Z. Phys. C61

1994

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Misiak and J. Urban, QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z penguins and W boxes , Phys. Lett. B451

1999

Earlier work this paper cites.

K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn and M. Steinhauser, RunDec: A Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses , Comput. Phys. Commun. 133

2000

Earlier work this paper cites.

U. Mahanta, Neutrino masses and mixing angles from leptoquark interactions , Phys. Rev. D62

2000

Earlier work this paper cites.

K. S. Babu and C. N. Leung, Classification of effective neutrino mass operators , Nucl. Phys. B619

2001

Earlier work this paper cites.

D. Chakraverty, D. Choudhury and A. Datta, A Nonsupersymmetric resolution of the anomalous muon magnetic moment , Phys. Lett. B506

2001

Earlier work this paper cites.

K.-m. Cheung, Muon anomalous magnetic moment and leptoquark solutions , Phys. Rev. D64

2001

Earlier work this paper cites.

J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Oscillating neutrinos and μ → e ​ γ \mu\to e\gamma , Nucl. Phys. B618

2001

Earlier work this paper cites.

G. Hiller and F. Krüger, More model-independent analysis of b → s b\to s processes , Phys. Rev. D69

2004

Earlier work this paper cites.

SINDRUM II

2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and G. Piranishvili, Angular distributions of B ¯ → K ¯ ​ ℓ + ​ ℓ − \bar{B}\to\bar{K}\ell^{+}\ell^{-} decays , JHEP 12

Original

2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell, π / K → e ​ ν ¯ e \pi/K\to e\bar{\nu}_{e} branching ratios to O( e 2 ​ p 4 e^{2}p^{4} ) in Chiral Perturbation Theory , JHEP 10

Original

2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. de Gouvea and J. Jenkins, A Survey of Lepton Number Violation Via Effective Operators , Phys. Rev. D77

Original

2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

D. Aristizabal Sierra, M. Hirsch and S. G. Kovalenko, Leptoquarks: Neutrino masses and accelerator phenomenology , Phys. Rev. D77

Original

2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

0802.2882

Original

R. Fleischer, Flavour Physics and CP Violation: Expecting the LHC , in High-energy physics. Proceedings, 4th Latin American CERN-CLAF School, Vina del Mar, Chile, February 18-March 3, 2007 , pp. 105–157, 2008 · 2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

K. S. Babu and J. Julio, Two-Loop Neutrino Mass Generation through Leptoquarks , Nucl. Phys. B841

Original

2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the Hadronic Contributions to the Muon g − 2 g-2 and to α ⁡ ( M Z ) \alpha(M_{Z}) , Eur. Phys. J. C71

Original

2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

Heavy Flavor Averaging Group

Original

2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto, Understanding the B → K ∗ ​ μ + ​ μ − B\to K^{*}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} Anomaly , Phys. Rev. D88

Original

2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov and R. Watanabe, Testing leptoquark models in B ¯ → D ( ∗ ) ​ τ ​ ν ¯ \bar{B}\to D^{(*)}\tau\bar{\nu} , Phys. Rev. D88

Original

2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe, New physics in the weak interaction of B ¯ → D ( ∗ ) ​ τ ​ ν ¯ \bar{B}\to D^{(*)}\tau\bar{\nu} , Phys. Rev. D87

Original

2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

P. W. Angel, N. L. Rodd and R. R. Volkas, Origin of neutrino masses at the LHC: Δ ​ L = 2 \Delta L=2 effective operators and their ultraviolet completions , Phys. Rev. D87

Original

2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

P. W. Angel, Y. Cai, N. L. Rodd, M. A. Schmidt and R. R. Volkas, Testable two-loop radiative neutrino mass model based on an L ​ L ​ Q ​ d c ​ Q ​ d c LLQd^{c}Qd^{c} effective operator , JHEP 10

Original

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik and I. Nišandžić, Minimally flavored colored scalar in B ¯ → D ( ∗ ) ​ τ ​ ν ¯ \bar{B}\to D^{(*)}\tau\bar{\nu} and the mass matrices constraints , JHEP 11

Original

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak Precision Observables, New Physics and the Nature of a 126 GeV Higgs Boson , JHEP 08

Original

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Martin Camalich, SU ⁡ ( 2 ) × U ⁡ ( 1 ) \mathrm{SU}(2)\times{}\mathrm{U}(1) , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113

2014

Cited alongside, same era.

G. Hiller and M. Schmaltz, R K R_{K} and future b → s ​ ℓ ​ ℓ b\to s\ell\ell physics beyond the standard model opportunities , Phys. Rev. D90

S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, Reassessing the discovery potential of the B → K ∗ ​ ℓ + ​ ℓ − B\to K^{*}\ell^{+}\ell^{-} decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities , Phys. Rev. D93

Original

2016

Later among the works it cites.

S. Bhattacharya, S. Nandi and S. K. Patra, Optimal-observable analysis of possible new physics in B → D ( ∗ ) ​ τ ​ ν τ B\to D^{(\ast)}\tau\nu_{\tau} , Phys. Rev. D93

Original

2016

Later among the works it cites.

D. Bečirević, N. Košnik, O. Sumensari and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Palatable Leptoquark Scenarios for Lepton Flavor Violation in Exclusive b → s ​ ℓ 1 ​ ℓ 2 b\to s\ell_{1}\ell_{2} modes , JHEP 11

Original

2016

Later among the works it cites.

D. Bečirević, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik and O. Sumensari, Leptoquark model to explain the B B -physics anomalies, R K R_{K} and R D R_{D} , Phys. Rev. D94

Original

2016

Later among the works it cites.