Built on

T. P. Cheng and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D 35
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Kalinowski, Phys. Lett. B 245
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Garisto, Phys. Rev. D 51
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Caprini, L. Lellouch and M. Neubert, Nucl. Phys. B 530
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Melikhov and B. Stech, Phys. Rev. D 62
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. H. Chen and C. Q. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 71
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. H. Chen and C. Q. Geng, JHEP 0610
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. D 82
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. H. Ahn and C. H. Chen, Phys. Lett. B 690
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. P. Lees et al
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik and I. Nisandzic, Phys. Rev. D 85
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, I. Nisandzic and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Crivellin, C. Greub and A. Kokulu, Phys. Rev. D 86
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Datta, M. Duraisamy and D. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D 86
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. A. Bailey et al
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. P. Lees et al
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. G. Deshpande and A. Menon, JHEP 1301
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Celis, M. Jung, X. Q. Li and A. Pich, JHEP 1301
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. G. He and G. Valencia, Phys. Rev. D 87
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. D 87
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Ko, Y. Omura and C. Yu, JHEP 1303
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Biancofiore, P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio, Phys. Rev. D 87
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

I. Dorsner, S. Fajfer, N. Kosnik and I. Nisandzic, JHEP 1311
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov and R. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. D 88
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Hernandez-Sanchez, S. Moretti, R. Noriega-Papaqui and A. Rosado, JHEP 1307
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Abada, A. M. Teixeira, A. Vicente and C. Weiland, JHEP 1402
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Huschle et al
Original
2015
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

D. Das, C. Hati, G. Kumar and N. Mahajan, Phys. Rev. D 94
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner and C. T. Tran, Phys. Rev. D 94
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
S. M. Boucenna, A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, JHEP 1612
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
D. Becirevic, S. Fajfer, N. Kosnik and O. Sumensari, Phys. Rev. D 94
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
G. Hiller, D. Loose and K. Schonwald, JHEP 1612
Original
2016

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2017

Charged-Higgs on $R_{D^{(*)}}$, $\tau$ polarization, and FBA

Chen, Chuan-Hung, Nomura, Takaaki

Understand

We study the influence of a charged-Higgs on the excess of branching fraction ratio, $R_M = BR(\bar B \to M \tau \bar\nu_\tau)/BR(\bar B \to M \ell \bar \nu_\ell)$ $(M=D, D^*)$, in a generic two-Higgs-doublet model.

In order to investigate the lepton polarization, the detailed decay amplitudes with lepton helicity are given.
When the charged-Higgs is used to resolve excesses, it is found that two independent Yukawa couplings are needed to explain the $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ anomalies.
We show that when the upper limit of $BR(B_c \to \tau \bar \nu_\tau)<30\%$ is included, $R_D$ can be significantly enhanced while $R_{D^*}<0.27$.