Built on

M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The early universe
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: improved analysis
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Birkedal, K. Matchev and M. Perelstein, Dark matter at colliders: A Model independent approach
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Beltran, D. Hooper, E. W. Kolb and Z. C. Krusberg, Deducing the nature of dark matter from direct and indirect detection experiments in the absence of collider signatures of new physics
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Beltran, D. Hooper, E. W. Kolb, Z. A. C. Krusberg and T. M. P. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Bai, P. J. Fox and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the Frontier of Dark Matter Direct Detection
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T. M. P. Tait and H. B. Yu, Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Fan, M. Reece and L. T. Wang, Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. H. Cao, C. R. Chen, C. S. Li and H. Zhang, Effective Dark Matter Model: Relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T. M. P. Tait and H. B. Yu, Constraints on Light Majorana dark Matter from Colliders
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T. M. P. Tait and A. M. Wijangco, LHC Bounds on Interactions of Dark Matter
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Chatrchyan et al
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Aad et al
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Aad et al
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Chatrchyan et al
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing Energy Signatures of Dark Matter at the LHC
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing Energy Signatures of Dark Matter at the LHC
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Friedland, M. L. Graesser, I. M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, Probing Nonstandard Standard Model Backgrounds with LHC Monojets
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

S. Chatrchyan et al
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Aad et al
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Chatrchyan et al
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
H. An, X. Ji and L. T. Wang, Light Dark Matter and Z ′ Z^{\prime} Dark Force at Colliders
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
A. L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers and Y. Xu, The Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter Direct Detection
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

S. Davidson, Including the Z in an Effective Field Theory for dark matter at the LHC
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
O. Buchmueller, M. J. Dolan and C. McCabe, Beyond Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
G. Busoni, A. De Simone, J. Gramling, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Part II: Complete Analysis for the s s -channel
Original
2014
Later among the works it cites.
G. Busoni, A. De Simone, T. Jacques, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC Part III: Analysis for the t t -channel

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2015

Robust collider limits on heavy-mediator Dark Matter

Racco, Davide, Wulzer, Andrea, Zwirner, Fabio

Understand

We discuss how to consistently use Effective Field Theories (EFTs) to set universal bounds on heavy-mediator Dark Matter at colliders, without prejudice on the model underlying a given effective interaction.

We illustrate the method for a Majorana fermion, universally coupled to the Standard Model quarks via a dimension-6 axial-axial four-fermion operator.
We recast the ATLAS mono-jet analysis and show that a considerable fraction of the parameter space, seemingly excluded by a na\"ive EFT interpretation, is actually still unexplored.
Consistently set EFT limits can be reinterpreted in any specific underlying model.