Built on

T. Damour, G. W. Gibbons and C. Gundlach, “Dark Matter, Time Varying G G , and a Dilaton Field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 64
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Amendola, “Coupled quintessence,” Phys. Rev. D 62
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, “Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models,” Astrophys. J. 538
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Lewis and S. Bridle, “Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach,” Phys. Rev. D 66
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Wang, Y. g. Gong and E. Abdalla, “Transition of the dark energy equation of state in an interacting holographic dark energy model,” Phys. Lett. B 624
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. H. He and B. Wang, “Effects of the interaction between dark energy and dark matter on cosmological parameters,” JCAP 0806
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Feng, B. Wang, E. Abdalla and R. K. Su, “Observational constraints on the dark energy and dark matter mutual coupling,” Phys. Lett. B 665
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Micheletti, E. Abdalla and B. Wang, “A Field Theory Model for Dark Matter and Dark Energy in Interaction,” Phys. Rev. D 79
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Koyama, R. Maartens and Y. S. Song, “Velocities as a probe of dark sector interactions,” JCAP 0910
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. H. He, B. Wang and E. Abdalla, “Stability of the curvature perturbation in dark sectors’ mutual interacting models,” Phys. Lett. B 671
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. M. R. Micheletti, “Observational constraints on holographic tachyonic dark energy in interaction with dark matter,” JCAP 1005
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

J. H. He, B. Wang and E. Abdalla, “Testing the interaction between dark energy and dark matter via latest observations,” Phys. Rev. D 83
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
A. B. Pavan, E. G. M. Ferreira, S. Micheletti, J. C. C. de Souza and E. Abdalla, “Exact cosmological solutions of models with an interacting dark sector,” Phys. Rev. D 86
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
L. R. Abramo et al
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Abdalla, L. L. Graef and B. Wang, “A Model for Dark Energy decay,” Phys. Lett. B 726
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
P. C. Ferreira, D. Pavón and J. C. Carvalho, “On detecting interactions in the dark sector with H ⁡ ( z ) H(z) data,” Phys. Rev. D 88

Then

A. Font-Ribera et al
Original
2014
Closest in time.
P. A. R. Ade et al
Original
2014
Closest in time.
T. Delubac et al
Original
2015
Closest in time.
A. A. Costa, L. C. Olivari and E. Abdalla, “Quintessence with Yukawa Interaction,” Phys. Rev. D 92
Original
2015
Closest in time.
É. Aubourg et al
Original
2015
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2014

Evidence for interacting dark energy from BOSS

Ferreira, Elisa G. M., Quintin, Jerome, Costa, André A. et al.

Understand

The result presented by the BOSS-SDSS Collaboration measuring the baryon acoustic oscillations of the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest from high-redshift quasars indicates a $2.5\sigma$ departure from the standard $\Lambda$-cold-dark-matter model.

This is the first time that the evolution of dark energy at high redshifts has been measured, and the current results cannot be explained by simple generalizations of the cosmological constant.
We show here that a simple phenomenological interaction in the dark sector provides a good explanation for this deviation, naturally accommodating the Hubble parameter obtained by BOSS, $H(z=2.34)=222 \pm 7 ~\mathrm{km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$.
By performing a global fit of the parameters with the inclusion of this new data set together with the Planck data for the interacting model, we are able to show that some interacting models have constraints for $H(2.34)$ and $D_\mathrm{A}(2.34)$ that are compatible with the ones obtained by the BOSS Collaboration, showing a better concordance than $\Lambda$CDM.