Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The National Science Foundation (NSF) will be experimenting with a new distributed approach to reviewing proposals, whereby a group of principal investigators (PIs) or proposers in a subfield act as reviewers for the proposals submitted by the same set of PIs.
P. Young, “Optimal voting rules,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51–64, 1995
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, J. R. Green et al. , Microeconomic theory . Oxford university press New York, 1995, vol. 1
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. F. Camerer, “Progress in behavioral game theory,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 167–188, 1997
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. R. Merrifield and D. G. Saari, “Telescope time without tears: a distributed approach to peer review,” Astronomy & Geophysics , vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 4–16, 2009
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
(2013, May) Dear colleague letter: Information to principal investigators (pis) planning to submit proposals to the sensors and sensing systems (sss) program october 1, 2013, deadline. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13096/nsf13096.jsp
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Sham peer review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sham_peer_review
Cited in the paper.
M. Mitzenmacher. (2013, June) Nsf reviewing trial run. http://mybiasedcoin.blogspot.com/2013/06/nsf-reviewing-trial-run.html
2013
Closest in time.
R. Vohra. (2013, June) A mechanism design approach to peer review. http://theoryclass.wordpress.com/2013/06/06/a-mechanism-design-approach-to-peer-review/
2013
Closest in time.
A. Procaccia. (2013, June) Nsf (actually) reviewing via social choice. http://agtb.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/nsf-actually-reviewing-via-social-choice
2013
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…