Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Neutrinoless double beta decay is a process that violates lepton number conservation.
H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus et al. (Heidelberg-Moscow Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. A 12
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. I. Tretyak and Y. G. Zdesenko, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 80
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. E. Aalseth et al. (IGEX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 65
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. E. Aalseth et al. (IGEX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 70
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus et al. , Phys. Lett. B 586
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
The number of signal counts expected can be evaluated by rescaling the number of counts ( 28.75 ± 6.86 ) (28.75\pm 6.86) from Ref. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus et al. 2004 for the active exposure ( f a v f_{av}
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and I. Krivosheina, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Caldwell and K. Kröninger, Phys. Rev. D 74
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Budjáš et al. , JINST 4
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Caldwell, D. Kollar, and K. Kröninger, Comput. Phys. Comm. 180
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Menendez et al. , Nucl. Phys. A 818
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. S. Barabash, Phys. Rev. C 81
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
B. J. Mount, M. Redshaw, and E. G. Myers, Phys.Rev. C 81
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
T. R. Rodriguez and G. Martinez-Pinedo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, Nucl. Phys. A 847
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Smolnikov and P. Grabmayr, Phys.Rev. C 81
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Rodejohann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
S. M. Bilenki and C. Giunti, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Kotila and F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. C 85
2012
Later among the works it cites.
B. Schwingenheuer, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 525
2013
Closest in time.
A. Gando et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110
2013
Closest in time.
K.-H. Ackermann et al. (GERDA Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 73
2013
Closest in time.
J. Barea, J. Kotila, and F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. C 87
2013
Closest in time.
A. Meroni, S. T. Petcov, and F. Simkovic, JHEP 1302
2013
Closest in time.
F. Simkovic, V. Rodin, A. Faessler, and P. Vogel, Phys. Rev. C. 87
2013
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
J. D. Vergados, H. Ejiri, and F. Simkovic, Rept. Prog. Phys. 75
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
J. J. Gomez Cadenas et al. , Riv. Nuovo Cim. 35
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Auger et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Agostini et al. , J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 368
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
C. S. NV, Lammerdries 25, B-2439 Olen, Belgium
Cited in the paper.
M. T. Mustonen and J. Engel, (2013), arXiv:1301.6997 [nucl-th]
2013
Closest in time.
P. S. Bhupal Dev et al. , (2013), arXiv:1305.0056 [hep-ph]
2013
Closest in time.
The sensitivity of KamLAND-Zen corresponds to an equivalent background of 460 ± \pm 21.5 counts. The equivalent observed counts are -1.17 σ \sigma lower, i.e. about 435 events Bergström 2013 . EXO-200 expects 7.5 ± 0.7 7.5\pm 0.7 counts in the interval Q β β ± 2 σ E Q_{\beta\beta}\pm 2\sigma_{E} and observes 5 events
2013
Closest in time.
2013
Closest in time.