Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We prove two theorems concerning the time evolution in general isolated quantum systems.
1929
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
It is known that systems of identical particles with a rather general class of two-body potentials (including the Lennard-Jones potential with a hardcore) satisfy this property. See D. Ruelle, Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Popescu, A. J. Short, A. Winter, Nature Phys. 2
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, N. Zanghì, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Reimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Linden, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, A. Winter, Phys. Rev. E 79
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Mastrodonato, R. Tumulka, N. Zanghì, Phys. Rev. E 81
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Reimann and M. Kastner, New J. Phys. 14
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, N. Zanghì, arXiv:1003.2129
Cited in the paper.
2012
Later among the works it cites.
J. Sato, R. Kanamoto, E. Kaminishi, T. Deguchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108
2012
Later among the works it cites.
S. Sugiura, A. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. Lett 108
2012
Later among the works it cites.
A. J. Short, T. C. Farrelly, New J. Phys. 14
2012
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited in the paper.
It is likely that the key quantity N ( ε ) / d eff N(\varepsilon)/d_{\mathrm{eff}} in [ 14 ] is of order e const . V e^{\mathrm{const.}V} for large V V . See also the remark in [ 8 ]
Cited in the paper.
Cited in the paper.
By f ( V ) ∼ g ( V ) f(V)\sim g(V) , we mean V − 1 log { f ( V ) / g ( V ) } → 0 V^{-1}\log\{f(V)/g(V)\}\to 0 as V ↑ ∞ V\uparrow\infty
Cited in the paper.
Consider the simplest situation where one is interested in the behavior of a single macroscopic quantity A ^ \hat{A} , whose equilibrium value is A ¯ \bar{A} . Then one can define ℋ eq {\cal H}_{\mathrm{eq}} as the subspace spanned by the eigenstates of the nonnegative operator ( A ^ − A ¯ ) 2 (\hat{A}-\bar{A})^{2} corresponding to sufficiently small eigenvalues
Cited in the paper.
Let P ^ ℋ neq \hat{P}_{{\cal H}_{\mathrm{neq}}} be the projection onto ℋ neq {\cal H}_{\mathrm{neq}} , and consider the expectation value ⟨ φ | P ^ ℋ neq | φ ⟩ \langle\varphi|\hat{P}_{{\cal H}_{\mathrm{neq}}}|\varphi\rangle . By taking the uniform average over all normalized | φ ⟩ ∈ ℋ |\varphi\rangle\in{\cal H} , we get ⟨ φ | P ^ ℋ neq | φ ⟩ ¯ = d neq / D ≪ 1 \overline{\langle\varphi|\hat{P}_{{\cal H}_{\mathrm{neq}}}|\varphi\rangle}=d_{\mathrm{neq}}/D\ll 1 . From the standard argument based on the Markov inequality (see, e.g., [ 6 , 7 ] ), we find that ⟨ φ | P ^ ℋ neq | φ ⟩ ≪ 1 \langle\varphi|\hat{P}_{{\cal H}_{\mathrm{neq}}}|\varphi\rangle\ll 1 for a typical | φ ⟩ ∈ ℋ |\varphi\rangle\in{\cal H} . That ⟨ φ | P ^ ℋ neq | φ ⟩ ≪ 1 \langle\varphi|\hat{P}_{{\cal H}_{\mathrm{neq}}}|\varphi\rangle\ll 1 implies | φ ⟩ |\varphi\rangle is very close to ℋ eq {\cal H}_{\mathrm{eq}} and hence represents the equilibrium state
Cited in the paper.
In the simplest example discussed in [ 19 ] , one can show that the subspace ℋ eq {\cal H}_{\mathrm{eq}} occupies most of ℋ {\cal H} if the microcanonical average of ( A ^ − A ¯ ) 2 (\hat{A}-\bar{A})^{2} is small. If it happens to be the case that ℋ eq {\cal H}_{\mathrm{eq}} does not
Cited in the paper.