Built on

A. G. Riess et al
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Perlmutter et al
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Conley, J. Guy, M. Sullivan, N. Regnault, P. Astier, C. Balland, S. Basa and R. G. Carlberg et al
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Riess, L. Macri, S. Casertano, H. Lampeitl, H. C. Ferguson, A. V. Filippenko, S. W. Jha and W. Li et al
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Suzuki, D. Rubin, C. Lidman, G. Aldering, R. Amanullah, K. Barbary, L. F. Barrientos and J. Botyanszki et al
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
G. -B. Zhao, R. G. Crittenden, L. Pogosian and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
X. -D. Li, S. Wang, Q. -G. Huang, X. Zhang and M. Li, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. G 55
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
W. -S. Zhang, C. Cheng, Q. -G. Huang, M. Li, S. Li, X. -D. Li and S. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 55
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
W. J. Percival et al
Original
2013

Then

A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Phys. Rev. D 66
Original
2013
Closest in time.
N. Said, E. Di Valentino and M. Gerbino, Phys. Rev. D 88
Original
2013
Closest in time.
L. Verde, S. M. Feeney, D. J. Mortlock and H. V. Peiris, JCAP 1309
Original
2013
Closest in time.
E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri and O. Mena, JCAP 1311
Original
2013
Closest in time.
V. Marra, L. Amendola, I. Sawicki and W. Valkenburg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 241305
Original
2013
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2013

The Dark Side of the Universe after Planck

Cheng, Cheng, Huang, Qing-Guo

Understand

Recently released Planck data implies a smaller Hubble constant $H_0$ than that from Hubble Space Telescope project (HST) and a larger percentage of the matter components $\Omega_m$ compared to Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) in $\Lambda$CDM model.

In this paper we found that even though the tension on $H_0$ between Planck and HST can be relaxed if the dark radiation is introduced ($\Delta N_{\rm eff}=0.536_{-0.224}^{+0.229}$ at $68\%$ CL from the datasets of Planck+WMAP Polarization (WP)+baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO)+the combination of supernova Union2.1 compilation of 580 SNe (Union2.1)+HST), $\Omega_m$ from Planck is still not nicely compatible with that from SNLS.
The tensions between Planck and other astrophysical datasets can be significantly relaxed in $w$CDM model, and the combination of these datasets prefers a phantom-like dark energy at more than $95\%$ CL: $w=-1.15\pm 0.07$ and $w=-1.16\pm 0.06$ at $68\%$ CL from Planck+WP+BAO+Union2.1+HST and Planck+WP+BAO+SNLS+HST respectively.
From the statistical point of view, there is no evidence for a time-evolving equation of state ($\Delta \chi^2=-0.3$ compared to a constant equation of state for the combination of Planck+WP+BAO+SNLS+HST).