Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

Tau-functions for Quiver Gauge Theories · Around

2013

Tau-functions for Quiver Gauge Theories

Marshakov, A.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

The prepotentials for the quiver supersymmetric gauge theories are defined as quasiclassical tau-functions, depending on two different sets of variables: the parameters of the UV gauge theory or the bare compexified couplings, and the vacuum condensates of the theory in IR.

The bare couplings are introduced as periods on the UV base curve, and the consistency of corresponding gradient formulas for the tau-functions is proven using the Riemann bilinear relations.
It is shown, that dependence of generalised prepotentials for the quiver gauge theories upon the bare couplings turns to coincide with the corresponding formulas for the derivatives of tau-functions for the isomonodromic deformations.
Computations for the SU(2) quiver gauge theories with bi- and tri-fundamental matter are performed explicitly and analysed in the context of 4d/2d correspondence.

Built on

M. Sato, T. Miwa and M. Jimbo, Holonomic quantum fields I - V , Publ. RIMS 14
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
Al. Zamolodchikov, Comm.Math.Phys. 96
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
Al. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B285
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Nanopoulos and D. Xie, JHEP 1003
Original
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Krichever, Commun. Pure. Appl. Math. 47
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Kharchev, A. Marshakov, A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 8
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 426
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Gorsky, I. Krichever, A. Marshakov, A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Phys. Lett. B 355
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Ohyama, “Differential relations of theta functions”, Osaka J. Math, 35
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

A. Zamolodchikov and Al. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B 477
1996
Cited alongside, same era.
A. S. Losev, N. Nekrasov and S. Shatashvili, Nucl. Phys. B534
1998
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Gorsky, A. Marshakov, A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Nucl. Phys. B527
1998
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Grimm, A. Klemm, M. Marino and M. Weiss, JHEP 0708
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Feigin and A. Veselov, Advances in Math. 212
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Marshakov and N. Nekrasov, JHEP 0701
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

R. Poghossian, JHEP 0912
Original
2009
Later among the works it cites.
L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Lett. Math. Phys. 91
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
T. Eguchi and K. Maruyoshi, JHEP 1002
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
N. Nekrasov, A. Rosly and S. Shatashvili, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 216
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
L. Hollands, C. Keller and J. Song, JHEP 1110
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

A. Marshakov, JHEP 0803

2008

Cited alongside, same era.

A. Marshakov, A. Mironov and A. Morozov, JHEP 0911

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

A. S. Losev, A. Marshakov and N. Nekrasov, in Ian Kogan memorial volume From fields to strings: circumnavigating theoretical physics

Cited in the paper.

D. Gaiotto, G. Moore and A. Neitzke, arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]

Cited in the paper.

J. Teschner and G. Vartanov, arXiv:1202.4698 [math-ph]

Cited in the paper.

D. Gaiotto and J. Maldacena, arXiv:0904.4466 [hep-th]

Cited in the paper.

D. Gaiotto, JHEP 1208

2012

Later among the works it cites.

O. Gamayun, N. Iorgov, O. Lisovyy, JHEP 1210

2012

Later among the works it cites.

A. Mironov, A. Morozov, Y. Zenkevich and A. Zotov, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 97

2013

Closest in time.