Understand
A recent paper by Gambini, Rastgoo and Pullin [arXiv:1106.1417 investigates the important issue of constraints from Lorentz invariance on Planck scale physics, arguing that the classic analysis of Collins, Perez, Sudarsky, Urrutia and Vucetich \cite{cpsuv} is not generally valid.
- We argue that the new work is based on models that do not capture the relevant physics, and that almost all models of observable high energy Lorentz violation, and proposed Lorentz-violating theories of quantum gravity, are ruled out by low energy tests; the only known exceptions are based on supersymmetry.
Built on
Amelino-Camelia G, Ellis J R, Mavromatos N E, Nanopoulos D V and Sarkar S 1998 Nature
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gambini R and Pullin J 1999 Phys. Rev
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Collins J, Perez A, Sudarsky D, Urrutia L and Vucetich H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Similar
Groot Nibbelink S and Pospelov M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Jain P and Ralston J P 2005 Phys. Lett
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
Then
Beyond the bibliography
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…