Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2009

Implications of the CDMS result on Dark Matter and LHC physics

Kadastik, M., Kannike, K., Racioppi, A. et al.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

The requirements of electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB) and correct thermal relic density of Dark Matter (DM) predict large spin-independent direct detection cross section in scalar DM models based on underlying SO(10) non-supersymmetric GUT.

Interpreting the CDMS signal events as DM recoil on nuclei, we study implications of this assumption on EWSB, Higgs boson mass and direct production of scalar DM at LHC experiments.
We show that this interpretation indicates relatively light DM, M_DM ~ O(100) GeV, with large pair production cross section at LHC in correlation with the spin-independent direct DM detection cross section.
The next-to-lightest dark scalar S_NL is predicted to be long-lived, providing distinctive experimental signatures of displaced vertex of two leptons or jets plus missing transverse energy.

Implications of the CDMS result on Dark Matter and LHC physics · Around

Built on

S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 7
1973
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Annals Phys. 93
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B 67
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 110
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. A. Casas, V. Di Clemente and M. Quiros, Nucl. Phys. B 553
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 64
2001
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Alekhin, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. D 74
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
N. G. Deshpande and E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 18
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Q. H. Cao, E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Phys. Rev. D 76
Original
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Hambye and M. H. G. Tytgat, Phys. Lett. B 659
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Bernabei et al
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

R. Adolphi et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
E. Komatsu et al
Original
2009
Closest in time.
J. Cooley, SLAC seminar on Dec. 17, 2009; L. Hsu, Fermilab seminar on Dec. 17, 2009. http://cdms.berkeley.edu
2009
Closest in time.
J. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 50
2009
Closest in time.
M. Kadastik, K. Kannike and M. Raidal, Phys. Rev. D 80
Original
2009
Closest in time.
M. Fairbairn and T. Schwetz, JCAP 0901
Original
2009
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

2008

Cited alongside, same era.

Cited in the paper.

M. Kadastik, K. Kannike and M. Raidal, arXiv:0903.2475 [hep-ph], accepted by Phys. Rev. D

Cited in the paper.

This scenario can also be a UV completion of fermion triplet DM, see M. Frigerio and T. Hambye, arXiv:0912.1545 [hep-ph]

Cited in the paper.

M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, arXiv:0912.2729 [hep-ph]

Cited in the paper.

For the present bounds see The LEP EW Working Group http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/LEPEWWG

Cited in the paper.

G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176

2009

Closest in time.