Built on

R.H. Price, Phys. Rev. D 5
1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Christodoulou, Commun. Math. Phys. 105
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Christodoulou, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 44
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

C. Gundlach, R. Price, and J. Pullin, Phys. Rev. D 49
1994
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Gundlach, R. Price, and J. Pullin, Phys. Rev. D 49
1994
Cited alongside, same era.
L.M. Burko and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 56
1997
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 66
Original
2002
Later among the works it cites.
P. Bizoń, T. Chmaj, and A. Rostworowski, Class. Quantum Grav. 26
2009
Closest in time.
P. Bizoń, T. Chmaj, A. Rostworowski, and S. Zaja̧c, Class. Quantum Grav. 26
2009
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2009

A note about late-time wave tails on a dynamical background

Bizoń, Piotr, Rostworowski, Andrzej

Understand

Consider a spherically symmetric spacetime generated by a self-gravitating massless scalar field $\phi$ and let $\psi$ be a test (nonspherical) massless scalar field propagating on this dynamical background.

Gundlach, Price, and Pullin \cite{gpp2} computed numerically the late-time tails for different multipoles of the field $\psi$ and suggested that solutions with compactly supported initial data decay in accord with Price's law as $t^{-(2\ell+3)}$ at timelike infinity.
We show that in the case of the time-dependent background Price's law holds only for $\ell=0$ while for each $\ell\geq 1$ the tail decays as $t^{-(2\ell+2)}$.