Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2009

Physical Point Simulation in 2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD

CS Collaboration, Aoki, S., Ishikawa, K. -I. et al.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

We present the results of the physical point simulation in 2+1 flavor lattice QCD with the nonperturbatively $O(a)$-improved Wilson quark action and the Iwasaki gauge action at $\beta=1.9$ on a $32^3 \times 64$ lattice.

The physical quark masses together with the lattice spacing is determined with $m_\pi$, $m_K$ and $m_\Omega$ as physical inputs.
There are two key algorithmic ingredients to make possible the direct simulation at the physical point: One is the mass-preconditioned domain-decomposed HMC algorithm to reduce the computational cost.
The other is the reweighting technique to adjust the hopping parameters exactly to the physical point.

Physical Point Simulation in 2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD · Around

Built on

Y. Iwasaki, Report No. UTHEP-118, 1983 (unpublished)
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
A.M. Ferrenberg and R.H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Lüscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 105
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. C. Sexton and D. H. Weingarten, Nucl. Phys. B380
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Brower, T. Ivanenko, A. Levi and K. Orginos, Nucl. Phys. B484
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ph. de Forcrand and T. Takaishi, Nucl. Phys. B
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Boriçi and P. de Forcrand, Nucl. Phys. B454
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Frezzotti and K. Jansen, Phys. Lett. B 402
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Alexandrou, P. de Forcrand, M. D’Elia and H. Panagopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 61
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hasenbusch, Phys. Lett. B 519
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Aoki et al
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

M. Hasenbusch and K. Jansen, Nucl. Phys. B659
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Lüscher, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 052; Comput. Phys. Commun. 165
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Kennedy, Nucl. Phys. B
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Colangelo, S. Dürr and C. Haefeli, Nucl. Phys. B721
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Aoki et al
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Ukawa et al
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Boku et al
2006
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

S. Aoki et al
2007
Later among the works it cites.
T. Ishikawa et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
A. Hasenfratz, R. Hoffmann and S. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 78
2008
Later among the works it cites.
C. Amsler et al
2008
Later among the works it cites.
S. Aoki et al
2009
Closest in time.
K.-I. Ishikawa et al
2009
Closest in time.
C. Jung, Proc. Sci. LAT2009
2009
Closest in time.
S. Aoki et al
2009
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

S. Aoki et al

2006

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Parks et al

2006

Cited alongside, same era.

K.-I. Ishikawa et al

2006

Cited alongside, same era.

T. Kaneko et al

2007

Cited alongside, same era.

S. Aoki et al

Cited in the paper.

Y. Taniguchi et al

2009

Closest in time.

For a recent review, see, E. Scholz, Proc. Sci. LAT2009

2009

Closest in time.