Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We demonstrate the power of a recently-proposed approximation scheme for the non-perturbative renormalization group that gives access to correlation functions over their full momentum range.
P. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. D 23
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B 301
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. A. Antonenko and A. I. Sokolov, Phys. Rev. E 51
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Grassberger, P. Sutter, and L. Schäfer, J. Phys. A 30
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, J. Phys. A 31
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Seide and C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B 562
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Baym, et al
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Arnold and G. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hasenbusch, J.Phys. A 34
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rep. 363
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Phys. Rep. 368
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Campostrini, et al
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Canet, et al
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Moshe and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rep. 385
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Deng and H. W. J. Blöte, Phys. Rev. E 68
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Delamotte, D. Mouhanna, and M. Tissier, Phys. Rev. B 69
2004
Later among the works it cites.
B. M. Kastening, Phys. Rev. A 69
2004
Later among the works it cites.
L. Canet, et al
2005
Later among the works it cites.
J.-P. Blaizot, R. Méndez-Galain, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Lett. B 632
2006
Later among the works it cites.
J.-P. Blaizot, R. Méndez-Galain, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. E 74
2006
Later among the works it cites.
M. Campostrini, et al
2006
Later among the works it cites.
A.A. Pogorelov and I.M. Suslov, JETP 105
2007
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
X. Sun, Phys. Rev. E 67
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Canet, H. Chaté, and B. Delamotte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
For an N N -component field ϕ → \vec{\phi} , Eq. ( 3
Cited in the paper.
F. Benitez, et al
Cited in the paper.
It has been conjectured (see Peli-rev and references therein), and this is confirmed by 1 / N 1/N calculations, that the presence of non-analytic terms in the flow of the ϕ 4 \phi^{4} coupling u u could be responsible for the discrepancy between exact and perturbative results in d = 2 d=2 . According to Sokal, no problem should arise when all couplings, including the irrelevant ones, are retained in the RG flow, as done here. This probably explains the quality of our results in d = 2 d=2
Cited in the paper.
J. P. Blaizot, R. Méndez-Galain, and N. Wschebor, Eur. Phys. J. B 58
2008
Closest in time.
G. Tarjus and M. Tissier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93
2008
Closest in time.