Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
This paper reviews the theory, phenomenology, and observational constraints on the coupling parameters of Einstein-aether gravity, i.e.
Y. Nambu, “Quantum electrodynamics in nonlinear gauge,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. Extra No. (1968) 190-195
1968
Earlier work this paper cites.
C.M. Will and K. Nordvedt, Jr., “Conservation laws and preferred frames in relativistic gravity. I. Preferred frame theories and an extended PPN formalism,” Astrophys. J. 177
1973
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. M. Eardley, “Observable effects of a scalar gravitational field in a binary pulsar,” Astrophysical Journal 196
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Deser and C. Teitelboim, “Supergravity Has Positive Energy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 39
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Gravitational Phenomenology In Higher Dimensional Theories And Strings,” Phys. Rev. D 40
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. M. Wald, “Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,” Phys. Rev. D 48
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. D. Brown and K. V. Kuchar, “Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 51
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. A. Hayward, “Gravitational energy in spherical symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 53
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. D. Brown and D. Marolf, “On Relativistic Material Reference Systems,” Phys. Rev. D 53
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
See, for example, M. Gasperini, “Singularity prevention and broken Lorentz symmetry,” Class. Quantum Grav. 4
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,” Phys. Rev. D 64
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Mattingly and T. Jacobson, “Relativistic gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,” in Proceedings of the Second Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. F. Barbero G. and E. J. S. Villasenor, “Lorentz Violations and Euclidean Signature Metrics,” Phys. Rev. D 68
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Eling and T. Jacobson, “Static post-Newtonian equivalence of GR and gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,” Phys. Rev. D 69
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. P. Burgess, “Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory,” Living Rev. Rel. 7
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. M. Gripaios, “Modified gravity via spontaneous symmetry breaking,” JHEP 0410
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. M. Carroll and E. A. Lim, “Lorentz-violating vector fields slow the universe down,” Phys. Rev. D 70
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Einstein–Aether waves,” Phys. Rev. D 70
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Mattingly, “Modern tests of Lorentz invariance,” Living Rev. Rel. 8
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
J. W. Elliott, G. D. Moore and H. Stoica, “Constraining the new æther: Gravitational Cherenkov radiation,” JHEP 0508
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
J. D. Bekenstein, “Relativistic gravitation theory for the MOND paradigm,” Phys. Rev. D 70
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Bluhm and V. A. Kostelecky, “Spontaneous Lorentz violation, Nambu-Goldstone modes, and gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 71
B. Z. Foster, “Radiation damping in Einstein-æther theory,” Phys. Rev. D 73
2006
Later among the works it cites.
C. Eling, “Energy in the Einstein-æther theory,” Phys. Rev. D 73
2006
Later among the works it cites.
C. Eling and T. Jacobson, “Spherical Solutions in Einstein–Aether Theory: Static Aether and Stars,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23
2006
Later among the works it cites.
B. Z. Foster, “Noether charges and black hole mechanics in Einstein-æther theory,” Phys. Rev. D 73
2006
Later among the works it cites.
C. Eling and T. Jacobson, “Black holes in Einstein-æther theory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23
2006
Later among the works it cites.
S. L. Dubovsky and S. M. Sibiryakov, “Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz invariance, black holes and perpetuum mobile of the 2nd kind,” Phys. Lett. B 638
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Z. Foster, “Metric redefinitions in Einstein-æther theory,” Phys. Rev. D 72
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
M. L. Graesser, A. Jenkins and M. B. Wise, “Spontaneous Lorentz violation and the long-range gravitational preferred-frame effect,” Phys. Lett. B 613
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
E. A. Lim, “Can We See Lorentz-Violating Vector Fields in the CMB?,” Phys. Rev. D 71
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Groot Nibbelink and M. Pospelov, “Lorentz violation in supersymmetric field theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Generally covariant model of a scalar field with high frequency dispersion and the cosmological horizon problem,” Phys. Rev. D 63
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Kanno and J. Soda, “Lorentz violating inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 74
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
2006
Later among the works it cites.
K. Kuchar, “The problem of time in quantum geometrodynamics,” in The Arguments of Time
2006
Later among the works it cites.
C. Eling and T. Jacobson, “Two-dimensional gravity with a dynamical æther,” Phys. Rev. D 74
2006
Later among the works it cites.
T. G. Zlosnik, P. G. Ferreira and G. D. Starkman, “Modifying gravity with the æther: An alternative to dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 75
2007
Later among the works it cites.
M. D. Seifert, “Stability of spherically symmetric solutions in modified theories of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 76
2007
Later among the works it cites.
2007
Later among the works it cites.
D. Garfinkle, C. Eling and T. Jacobson, “Numerical simulations of gravitational collapse in Einstein-æther theory,” Phys. Rev. D 76
2007
Later among the works it cites.
R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Perturbations and quasi-normal modes of black holes in Einstein-æther theory,” Phys. Lett. B 644
2007
Later among the works it cites.
C. Eling, B. Z. Foster, T. Jacobson and A. C. Wall, “Lorentz violation and perpetual motion,” Phys. Rev. D 75
2007
Later among the works it cites.