Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Following our recent finding that the renowned formula $\vec x\times (\vec E\times\vec B)$ is not the correct density for the electromagnetic angular momentum, here we examine the validity of the Poynting vector $\vec E \times\vec B$ as the electromagnetic momentum density (or energy flux).
See, e.g, J.D. Bjorken and S.D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964)
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
See, e.g, S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972)
1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
See, e.g, T. Sloan, G. Smadja, and R. Voss, Phys. Rep. 162
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
X.S. Chen and F. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 27
1997
Cited alongside, same era.
See, e.g, J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics , 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York 1999)
1999
Cited alongside, same era.
X.S. Chen, X.F. Lü, W.M. Sun, F. Wang, and T. Goldman, Spin and orbital angular momentum in gauge theories (I): QED and determination of the angular momentum density
Cited in the paper.
X.S. Chen, X.F. Lü, W.M. Sun, F. Wang, and T. Goldman, Spin and orbital angular momentum in gauge theories (II): QCD and nucleon spin structure
Cited in the paper.
X.S. Chen, D. Qing, W.M. Sun, H.S. Zong, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 69
2006
Later among the works it cites.
S.J. van Enk and G. Nienhuis, Europhys. Lett. 25
2006
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…