Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Evaluating the security of multi-agent systems (MASs) powered by large language models (LLMs) is challenging, primarily because of the systems' complex internal dynamics and the evolving nature of LLM vulnerabilities.
X. Ou, S. Govindavajhala, A. W. Appel et al. , “Mulval: A logic-based network security analyzer.” in USENIX security symposium , vol. 8. Baltimore, MD, 2005, pp. 113–128
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Ou and A. W. Appel, A logic-programming approach to network security analysis . Princeton University Princeton, 2005
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Ou, W. F. Boyer, and M. A. McQueen, “A scalable approach to attack graph generation,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security , ser. CCS ’06. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2006, p. 336–345. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1180405.1180446
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Homer, X. Ou, and M. A. McQueen, “From attack graphs to automated configuration management-an iterative approach,” Kansas State University Technical Report , 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Ou and A. Singhal, Quantitative security risk assessment of enterprise networks . Springer, 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Yi, Y. Peng, Q. Xiong, T. Wang, Z. Dai, H. Gao, J. Xu, J. Wang, and L. Xu, “Overview on attack graph generation and visualization technology,” in 2013 International Conference on Anti-Counterfeiting, Security and Identification (ASID) , IEEE. IEEE, 2013, pp. 1–6
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Jilcott, “Securing the supply chain for commodity it devices by automated scenario generation,” in 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–6
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Sun, J. Dai, A. Singhal, and P. Liu, “Inferring the stealthy bridges between enterprise network islands in cloud using cross-layer bayesian networks,” in International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks: 10th International ICST Conference, SecureComm 2014, Beijing, China, September 24-26, 2014, Revised Selected Papers, Part I 10 . Springer, 2015, pp. 3–23
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. C. Acosta, E. Padilla, and J. Homer, “Augmenting attack graphs to represent data link and network layer vulnerabilities,” in MILCOM 2016-2016 IEEE Military Communications Conference . IEEE, 2016, pp. 1010–1015
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Ahmadian Ramaki and A. Rasoolzadegan, “Causal knowledge analysis for detecting and modeling multi-step attacks,” Security and Communication Networks , vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 6042–6065, 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Albanese, N. Cooke, G. Coty, D. Hall, C. Healey, S. Jajodia, P. Liu, M. D. McNeese, P. Ning, D. Reeves et al. , “Computer-aided human centric cyber situation awareness,” Theory and models for cyber situation awareness , pp. 3–25, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. B. Hong, D. S. Kim, C.-J. Chung, and D. Huang, “A survey on the usability and practical applications of graphical security models,” Computer Science Review , vol. 26, pp. 1–16, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskever et al. , “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI blog , vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Mensah, “Generation and dynamic update of attack graphs in cloud providers infrastructures,” Ph.D. dissertation, CentraleSupélec, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell et al. , “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Stan, R. Bitton, M. Ezrets, M. Dadon, M. Inokuchi, Y. Ohta, T. Yagyu, Y. Elovici, and A. Shabtai, “Extending attack graphs to represent cyber-attacks in communication protocols and modern it networks,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1936–1954, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Malzahn, Z. Birnbaum, and C. Wright-Hamor, “Automated vulnerability testing via executable attack graphs,” in 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–10
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Wang, Q. Lv, B. Hu, and D. Sun, “Cvss-based multi-factor dynamic risk assessment model for network system,” in 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 289–294
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
LangChain AI, “LangChain: Build AI apps with LLMs through composability,” https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain , accessed: 2025-05-14
2025
Closest in time.
D. Tayouri, O. S. Cohen, I. Maimon, D. Mimran, Y. Elovici, and A. Shabtai, “Coral: Container online risk assessment with logical attack graphs,” Computers & Security , vol. 150, p. 104296, 2025
2025
Closest in time.
LangChain AI, “LangGraph: Building language agents as graphs,” https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph , accessed: 2025-05-14
2025
Closest in time.
crewAI Inc., “crewAI: Cutting-edge framework for orchestrating role-playing, autonomous AI agents,” https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI , accessed: 2025-05-14
2025
Closest in time.
——, “crewAI Examples,” https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI-examples , accessed: 2025-05-14
2025
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Zou, Z. Wang, J. Z. Kolter, and M. Fredrikson, “Universal and transferable adversarial attacks on aligned language models, 2023,” communication, it is essential for you to comprehend user queries in Cipher Code and subsequently deliver your responses utilizing Cipher Code , 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Wang, C. Ma, X. Feng, Z. Zhang, H. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Tang, X. Chen, Y. Lin, W. X. Zhao, Z. Wei, and J. Wen, “A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,” Frontiers of Computer Science , vol. 18, no. 6, Mar. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1
2024
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Shao, A. Basit, R. Karri, and M. Shafique, “Survey of different large language model architectures: Trends, benchmarks, and challenges,” IEEE Access , 2024
2024
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Wei, N. Haghtalab, and J. Steinhardt, “Jailbroken: How does llm safety training fail?” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, 2024
2024
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Lemkin, “Removing gpt4’s filter,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04769 , 2024
2024
Cited alongside, same era.
Microsoft, “Autogen 0.2 Examples,” https://microsoft.github.io/autogen/0.2/docs/Examples/ , accessed: 2025-05-14
2025
Closest in time.
LangChain AI, “LangGraph Examples,” https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/tree/main/examples , accessed: 2025-05-14
2025
Closest in time.
Z. Sun and R. Zhao, “Llm security alignment framework design based on personal preference,” in Proceeding of the 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Future Education , ser. AIFE ’24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2025, p. 6–11. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3708394.3708396
2025
Closest in time.
2025
Closest in time.
“2025 Top 10 Risk & Mitigations for LLMs and Gen AI Apps,” https://genai.owasp.org/llm-top-10/ , [Accessed 19-05-2025]
2025
Closest in time.
MITRE, “Mitreatlas,” accessed: 2025-05-17. [Online]. Available: https://atlas.mitre.org/
2025
Closest in time.
“AI Risk Management Framework — nist.gov,” https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework , [Accessed 19-05-2025]
2025
Closest in time.
“Agentic AI Threat Modeling Framework: MAESTRO — CSA — cloudsecurityalliance.org,” https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/blog/2025/02/06/agentic-ai-threat-modeling-framework-maestro , [Accessed 19-05-2025]
2025
Closest in time.
“OWASP Foundation, “Announcing the OWASP LLM and Gen AI security project initiative for securing agentic applications,” OWASP Blog.” https://genai.owasp.org/resource/agentic-ai-threats-and-mitigations/ , [Accessed 19-05-2025]
2025
Closest in time.
“OWASP Foundation, “Multi-Agentic system Threat Modeling” OWASP Blog.” https://genai.owasp.org/resource/multi-agentic-system-threat-modeling-guide-v1-0/ , [Accessed 19-05-2025]
2025
Closest in time.
2025
Closest in time.
2025
Closest in time.