Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
LLM-as-a-Judge has emerged as a popular evaluation strategy, where advanced large language models assess generation results in alignment with human instructions.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020 · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the cross-lingual transferability of monolingual representations
Mikel Artetxe, Sebastian Ruder, and Dani Yogatama. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
WikiLingua: A new benchmark dataset for cross-lingual abstractive summarization
Faisal Ladhak, Esin Durmus, Claire Cardie, and Kathleen McKeown. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
BLEURT: Learning robust metrics for text generation
Thibault Sellam, Dipanjan Das, and Ankur Parikh. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bartscore: Evaluating generated text as text generation
Weizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, and Pengfei Liu. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey of evaluation metrics used for nlg systems
Ananya B Sai, Akash Kumar Mohankumar, and Mitesh M Khapra. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
MEGA: Multilingual evaluation of generative AI
Kabir Ahuja, Harshita Diddee, Rishav Hada, Millicent Ochieng, Krithika Ramesh, Prachi Jain, Akshay Nambi, Tanuja Ganu, Sameer Segal, Mohamed Ahmed, Kalika Bali, and Sunayana Sitaram. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Can large language models be an alternative to human evaluations?
Cheng-Han Chiang and Hung-yi Lee. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
The devil is in the errors: Leveraging large language models for fine-grained machine translation evaluation
Patrick Fernandes, Daniel Deutsch, Mara Finkelstein, Parker Riley, André Martins, Graham Neubig, Ankush Garg, Jonathan Clark, Markus Freitag, and Orhan Firat. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Human-like summarization evaluation with chatgpt
Mingqi Gao, Jie Ruan, Renliang Sun, Xunjian Yin, Shiping Yang, and Xiaojun Wan. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Findings of the 2023 conference on machine translation (WMT23): LLMs are here but not quite there yet
Tom Kocmi, Eleftherios Avramidis, Rachel Bawden, Ondˇrej Bojar, Anton Dvorkovich, Christian Federmann, Mark Fishel, Markus Freitag, Thamme Gowda, Roman Grundkiewicz, Barry Haddow, Philipp Koehn, Benjamin Marie, Christof Monz, Makoto Morishita, Kenton Murray, Makoto Nagata, Toshiaki Nakazawa, Martin Popel, Maja Popović, and Mariya Shmatova. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Large language models are state-of-the-art evaluators of translation quality
Tom Kocmi and Christian Federmann. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
XDailyDialog: A multilingual parallel dialogue corpus
Zeming Liu, Ping Nie, Jie Cai, Haifeng Wang, Zheng-Yu Niu, Peng Zhang, Mrinmaya Sachan, and Kaiping Peng. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated evaluation of written discourse coherence using GPT-4
Ben Naismith, Phoebe Mulcaire, and Jill Burstein. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Verbosity bias in preference labeling by large language models
Keita Saito, Akifumi Wachi, Koki Wataoka, and Youhei Akimoto. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Large language models are not yet human-level evaluators for abstractive summarization
Chenhui Shen, Liying Cheng, Xuan-Phi Nguyen, Yang You, and Lidong Bing. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Jiawei Gu, Xuhui Jiang, Zhichao Shi, Hexiang Tan, Xuehao Zhai, Chengjin Xu, Wei Li, Yinghan Shen, Shengjie Ma, Honghao Liu, Yuanzhuo Wang, and Jian Guo. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Are large language model-based evaluators the solution to scaling up multilingual evaluation?
Rishav Hada, Varun Gumma, Adrian Wynter, Harshita Diddee, Mohamed Ahmed, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, and Sunayana Sitaram. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
From generation to judgment: Opportunities and challenges of llm-as-a-judge
Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi, Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Yuxuan Jiang, Canyu Chen, Tianhao Wu, et al. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Introducing gpt-4o
OpenAI. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
OffsetBias: Leveraging debiased data for tuning evaluators
Junsoo Park, Seungyeon Jwa, Ren Meiying, Daeyoung Kim, and Sanghyuk Choi. 2024 · 2024
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Language models are multilingual chain-of-thought reasoners
Freda Shi, Mirac Suzgun, Markus Freitag, Xuezhi Wang, Suraj Srivats, Soroush Vosoughi, Hyung Won Chung, Yi Tay, Sebastian Ruder, Denny Zhou, Dipanjan Das, and Jason Wei. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Is ChatGPT a good NLG evaluator? a preliminary study
Jiaan Wang, Yunlong Liang, Fandong Meng, Zengkui Sun, Haoxiang Shi, Zhixu Li, Jinan Xu, Jianfeng Qu, and Jie Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena
Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Judgelm: Fine-tuned large language models are scalable judges
Lianghui Zhu, Xinggang Wang, and Xinlong Wang. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A survey on evaluation of large language models
Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Linyi Yang, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, et al. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
Aya expanse: Combining research breakthroughs for a new multilingual frontier
John Dang, Shivalika Singh, Daniel D’souza, Arash Ahmadian, Alejandro Salamanca, Madeline Smith, Aidan Peppin, Sungjin Hong, Manoj Govindassamy, Terrence Zhao, Sandra Kublik, Meor Amer, Viraat Aryabumi, Jon Ander Campos, Yi-Chern Tan, Tom Kocmi, Florian Strub, Nathan Grinsztajn, Yannis Flet-Berliac, Acyr Locatelli, Hangyu Lin, Dwarak Talupuru, Bharat Venkitesh, David Cairuz, Bowen Yang, Tim Chung, Wei-Yin Ko, Sylvie Shang Shi, Amir Shukayev, Sammie Bae, Aleksandra Piktus, Roman Castagné, Felipe Cruz-Salinas, Eddie Kim, Lucas Crawhall-Stein, Adrien Morisot, Sudip Roy, Phil Blunsom, Ivan Zhang, Aidan Gomez, Nick Frosst, Marzieh Fadaee, Beyza Ermis, Ahmet Üstün, and Sara Hooker. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, et al. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Is LLM-as-a-judge robust? investigating universal adversarial attacks on zero-shot LLM assessment
Vyas Raina, Adian Liusie, and Mark Gales. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
BERGEN: A benchmarking library for retrieval-augmented generation
David Rau, Hervé Déjean, Nadezhda Chirkova, Thibault Formal, Shuai Wang, Stéphane Clinchant, and Vassilina Nikoulina. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Quantifying language models’ sensitivity to spurious features in prompt design or: How i learned to start worrying about prompt formatting
Melanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Alane Suhr. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Lin Shi, Chiyu Ma, Wenhua Liang, Weicheng Ma, and Soroush Vosoughi. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Replacing judges with juries: Evaluating llm generations with a panel of diverse models
Pat Verga, Sebastian Hofstatter, Sophia Althammer, Yixuan Su, Aleksandra Piktus, Arkady Arkhangorodsky, Minjie Xu, Naomi White, and Patrick Lewis. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Meta-rewarding language models: Self-improving alignment with llm-as-a-meta-judge
Tianhao Wu, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva, Jing Xu, Yuandong Tian, Jiantao Jiao, Jason Weston, and Sainbayar Sukhbaatar. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, et al. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Justice or prejudice? quantifying biases in llm-as-a-judge
Jiayi Ye, Yanbo Wang, Yue Huang, Dongping Chen, Qihui Zhang, Nuno Moniz, Tian Gao, Werner Geyer, Chao Huang, Pin-Yu Chen, et al. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.