Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Mobile robot navigation can be challenged by system uncertainty.
D. B. Leineweber, I. Bauer, H. G. Bock, and J. P. Schlöder, “An efficient multiple shooting based reduced sqp strategy for large-scale dynamic process optimization. part 1: theoretical aspects,” Computers & Chemical Engineering , vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 157–166, 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Limón, T. Alamo, F. Salas, and E. F. Camacho, “Input to state stability of min–max mpc controllers for nonlinear systems with bounded uncertainties,” Automatica , vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 797–803, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Wächter and L. T. Biegler, “On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming,” Mathematical programming , vol. 106, pp. 25–57, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Wang and C. B. Low, “Modeling and analysis of skidding and slipping in wheeled mobile robots: Control design perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 676–687, 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
J.-C. Ryu and S. K. Agrawal, “Differential flatness-based robust control of mobile robots in the presence of slip,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 463–475, 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Fleming, B. Kouvaritakis, and M. Cannon, “Robust tube mpc for linear systems with multiplicative uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1087–1092, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Li, J. Deng, R. Lu, Y. Xu, J. Bai, and C.-Y. Su, “Trajectory-tracking control of mobile robot systems incorporating neural-dynamic optimized model predictive approach,” Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 740–749, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Pacheco and N. Luo, “Testing pid and mpc performance for mobile robot local path-following,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems , vol. 12, no. 11, p. 155, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Karydis, I. Poulakakis, J. Sun, and H. G. Tanner, “Probabilistically valid stochastic extensions of deterministic models for systems with uncertainty,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1278–1295, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Surana, “Koopman operator based observer synthesis for control-affine nonlinear systems,” in IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) , 2016, pp. 6492–6499
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Grüne, J. Pannek, L. Grüne, and J. Pannek, Nonlinear model predictive control . Springer, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Abraham, G. De La Torre, and T. D. Murphey, “Model-based control using koopman operators,” in Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Korda and I. Mezić, “Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control,” Automatica , vol. 93, pp. 149–160, 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Nathan Kutz, J. L. Proctor, and S. L. Brunton, “Applied koopman theory for partial differential equations and data-driven modeling of spatio-temporal systems,” Complexity , no. 1, p. 6010634, 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Bichiou, M. K. Bouafoura, and N. Benhadj Braiek, “Time optimal control laws for bilinear systems,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering , no. 1, p. 5217427, 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Sun, V. Rostampour, and M. Cao, “Self-triggered stochastic mpc for linear systems with disturbances,” IEEE Control Systems Letters , vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 787–792, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Bruder, X. Fu, and R. Vasudevan, “Advantages of bilinear koopman realizations for the modeling and control of systems with unknown dynamics,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4369–4376, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
L. Shi and K. Karydis, “Acd-edmd: Analytical construction for dictionaries of lifting functions in koopman operator-based nonlinear robotic systems,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 906–913, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
L. Shi and K. Karydis, “Enhancement for robustness of koopman operator-based data-driven mobile robotic systems,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , 2021, pp. 2503–2510
2021
Later among the works it cites.
T. Ji, A. N. Sivakumar, G. Chowdhary, and K. Driggs-Campbell, “Proactive anomaly detection for robot navigation with multi-sensor fusion,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 4975–4982, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
D. Bruder, C. D. Remy, and R. Vasudevan, “Nonlinear system identification of soft robot dynamics using koopman operator theory,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , 2019, pp. 6244–6250
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
J. A. Andersson, J. Gillis, G. Horn, J. B. Rawlings, and M. Diehl, “Casadi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control,” Mathematical Programming Computation , vol. 11, pp. 1–36, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. I. Károly, P. Galambos, J. Kuti, and I. J. Rudas, “Deep learning in robotics: Survey on model structures and training strategies,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 266–279, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Shi, H. Teng, X. Kan, and K. Karydis, “A data-driven hierarchical control structure for systems with uncertainty,” in IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) , 2020, pp. 57–63
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Edwards, G. Tang, G. Mamakoukas, T. Murphey, and K. Hauser, “Automatic tuning for data-driven model predictive control,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , 2021, pp. 7379–7385
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Oikawa, T. Kusakabe, K. Kutsuzawa, S. Sakaino, and T. Tsuji, “Reinforcement learning for robotic assembly using non-diagonal stiffness matrix,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2737–2744, 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Mamakoukas, M. L. Castano, X. Tan, and T. D. Murphey, “Derivative-based koopman operators for real-time control of robotic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Macenski, T. Foote, B. Gerkey, C. Lalancette, and W. Woodall, “Robot operating system 2: Design, architecture, and uses in the wild,” Science robotics , vol. 7, no. 66, p. eabm6074, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
L. Shi, Z. Liu, and K. Karydis, “Koopman operators for modeling and control of soft robotics,” Current Robotics Reports , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 23–31, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
H. Zhou, Y. Song, and V. Tzoumas, “Safe non-stochastic control of control-affine systems: An online convex optimization approach,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
W. Chen, G. Li, M. Li, W. Wang, P. Li, X. Xue, X. Zhao, and L. Liu, “Llm-enabled incremental learning framework for hand exoskeleton control,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , 2024
2024
Later among the works it cites.
D. Zhao, B. Li, F. Lu, J. She, and S. Yan, “Deep bilinear koopman model predictive control for nonlinear dynamical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , 2024
2024
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Later among the works it cites.
J. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Zhang, S. Agrawal, and K. Karydis, “Learning-based estimation of forward kinematics for an orthotic parallel robotic mechanism,” in 19th IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) , 2025, pp. 1–6
2025
Closest in time.