Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We demonstrate that time-evolved operators can construct a Krylov space to compute Operator complexity and introduce Krylov observability as a measure of effective phase space dimension in quantum systems.
B. Misra and E. C. G. Sudarshan, The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory, J. Math. Phys. 18
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Characterization of Chaotic Quantum Spectra and Universality of Level Fluctuation Laws, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Jaeger, The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks , GMD Report 148 (GMD - German National Research Institute for Computer Science, 2001)
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Maass, T. Natschläger, and H. Markram, Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations, Neural. Comput. 14
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Nielsen, M. R. Dowling, M. Gu, and A. C. Doherty, Quantum Computation as Geometry, Science 311
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Verstraeten, B. Schrauwen, M. D’Haene, and D. Stroobandt, An experimental unification of reservoir computing methods, Neural Networks 20
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature, Phys. Rev. B 75
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Facchi and S. Pascazio, Quantum Zeno dynamics: mathematical and physical aspects, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Appeltant, M. C. Soriano, G. Van der Sande, J. Danckaert, S. Massar, J. Dambre, B. Schrauwen, C. R. Mirasso, and I. Fischer, Information processing using a single dynamical node as complex system, Nat. Commun. 2
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Dambre, D. Verstraeten, B. Schrauwen, and S. Massar, Information processing capacity of dynamical systems, Sci. Rep. 2
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Fujii and K. Nakajima, Harnessing Disordered-Ensemble Quantum Dynamics for Machine Learning, Phys. Rev. Applied 8
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altman, A universal operator growth hypothesis, Phys. Rev. X 9
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. L. F. Barbón, E. Rabinovici, R. Shir, and R. Sinha, On the evolution of operator complexity beyond scrambling, J. High Energy Phys. 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Nakajima, K. Fujii, M. Negoro, K. Mitarai, and M. Kitagawa, Boosting Computational Power through Spatial Multiplexing in Quantum Reservoir Computing, Phys. Rev. Applied 11
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Magan and J. Simón, On operator growth and emergent Poincaré symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Kutvonen, K. Fujii, and T. Sagawa, Optimizing a quantum reservoir computer for time series prediction, Sci. Rep. 10
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Chen, H. I. Nurdin, and N. Yamamoto, Temporal information processing on noisy quantum computers, Phys. Rev. Applied 14
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Jian, B. Swingle, and Z. Xian, Complexity growth of operators in the SYK model and in JT gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Caputa and S. Datta, Operator growth in 2d CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Cao, A statistical mechanism for operator growth, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 54
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Dymarsky and M. Smolkin, Krylov complexity in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Martínez-Peña, G. L. Giorgi, J. Nokkala, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Dynamical Phase Transitions in Quantum Reservoir Computing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Kubota, H. Takahashi, and K. Nakajima, Unifying framework for information processing in stochastically driven dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Research 3
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu, Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states, Phys. Rev. D 106
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Fan, Universal relation for operator complexity, Phys. Rev. A 105
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Guo, Operator growth in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, arXiv (2022) , arXiv:2208.13362 [hep-th]
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. He, P. H. C. Lau, Z. Xian, and L. Zhao, Quantum chaos, scrambling and operator growth in $$ T\overline{T} $$deformed SYK models, J. High Energy Phys. 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Kim, J. Murugan, J. Olle, and D. Rosa, Operator delocalization in quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 105
2022
N. Götting, F. Lohof, and C. Gies, Exploring quantumness in quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. A 108
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
D. Fry, A. Deshmukh, S. Y. Chen, V. Rastunkov, and V. Markov, Optimizing quantum noise-induced reservoir computing for nonlinear and chaotic time series prediction, Sci. Rep. 13
2023
Later among the works it cites.
L. Domingo, G. Carlo, and F. Borondo, Taking advantage of noise in quantum reservoir computing, Sci. Rep. 13
2023
Later among the works it cites.
P. Mujal, R. Martínez-Peña, G. L. Giorgi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Time-series quantum reservoir computing with weak and projective measurements, npj Quantum Inf. 9
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
H. W. Lin, The bulk Hilbert space of double scaled SYK, J. High Energy Phys. 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Mück and Y. Yang, Krylov complexity and orthogonal polynomials, Nucl. Phys. B. 984
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Patramanis, Probing the entanglement of operator growth, Prog. Theor. Phys. 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Xia, J. Zou, X. Qiu, and X. Li, The reservoir learning power across quantum many-body localization transition, Front. Phys. 17
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Suzuki, Q. Gao, K. C. Pradel, K. Yasuoka, and N. Yamamoto, Natural quantum reservoir computing for temporal information processing, Sci. Rep. 12
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Pfeffer, F. Heyder, and J. Schumacher, Hybrid quantum-classical reservoir computing of thermal convection flow, Phys. Rev. Research 4
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Later among the works it cites.
T. Anegawa, N. Iizuka, and M. Nishida, Krylov complexity as an order parameter for deconfinement phase transitions at large N, J. High Energy Phys. 2024
2024
Later among the works it cites.
P. Caputa, H. Jeong, S. Yi, J. F. Pedraza, and L. Qu, Krylov complexity of density matrix operators, J. High Energy Phys. 2024
2024
Later among the works it cites.
K. Huh, H. Jeong, and J. F. Pedraza, Spread complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling, J. High Energy Phys. 2024
2024
Later among the works it cites.
X. Li, Q. Zhu, C. Zhao, X. Duan, B. Zhao, X. Zhang, H. Ma, J. Sun, and W. Lin, Higher-order granger reservoir computing: simultaneously achieving scalable complex structures inference and accurate dynamics prediction, Nat. Commun. 15
2024
Later among the works it cites.
M. J. Vasli, K. B. Velni, M. R. M. Mozaffar, A. Mollabashi, and M. Alishahiha, Krylov complexity in Lifshitz-type scalar field theories, EOJ C 84
2024
Later among the works it cites.
S. Čindrak, A. Paschke, L. C. Jaurigue, and K. Lüdge, Measurable Krylov Spaces and Eigenenergy Count in Quantum State Dynamics, J. High Energ. Phys. 2024
2024
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Later among the works it cites.
A. H. Abbas, H. Abdel-Ghani, and I. S. Maksymov, Classical and Quantum Physical Reservoir Computing for Onboard Artificial Intelligence Systems: A Perspective, Preprints 10.20944/preprints202406.1128.v1 (2024)
2024
Later among the works it cites.
A. Sannia, R. Martínez-Peña, M. C. Soriano, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Dissipation as a resource for Quantum Reservoir Computing, Quantum 8
2024
Later among the works it cites.
O. Ahmed, F. Tennie, and L. Magri, Prediction of chaotic dynamics and extreme events: A recurrence-free quantum reservoir computing approach, Phys. Rev. Research 6
2024
Later among the works it cites.
K. Kobayashi, K. Fujii, and N. Yamamoto, Feedback-Driven Quantum Reservoir Computing for Time-Series Analysis, PRX Quantum 5
2024
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Later among the works it cites.
L. Domingo, F. Borondo, G. Scialchi, A. J. Roncaglia, G. G. Carlo, and D. A. Wisniacki, Quantum reservoir complexity by the Krylov evolution approach, Phys. Rev. A 110
2024
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Zhou, W. Xia, L. Li, and W. Li, Diagnosing Quantum Many-body Chaos in Non-Hermitian Quantum Spin Chain via Krylov Complexity, arXiv 10.48550/arxiv.2501.15982 (2025)
2025
Closest in time.
P. Suchsland, R. Moessner, and P. W. Claeys, Krylov complexity and Trotter transitions in unitary circuit dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 111
2025
Closest in time.
S. Čindrak, L. C. Jaurigue, and K. Lüdge, Engineering quantum reservoirs through krylov complexity, expressivity and observability, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2409.12079 (2025)
2025
Closest in time.
B. Craps, O. Evnin, and G. Pascuzzi, Multiseed krylov complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134
2025
Closest in time.
N. Schütte, N. Götting, H. Müntinga, M. List, and C. Gies, Expressive Limits of Quantum Reservoir Computing, arXiv 10.48550/arxiv.2501.15528 (2025)
2025
Closest in time.
M. Vetrano, G. Lo Monaco, L. Innocenti, S. Lorenzo, and G. M. Palma, State estimation with quantum extreme learning machines beyond the scrambling time, npj Quantum Inf 11
2025
Closest in time.