Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Automated library APIs testing is difficult as it requires exploring a vast space of parameter inputs that may involve objects with complex data types.
R. Vallée-Rai, P. Co, E. Gagnon, L. Hendren, P. Lam, and V. Sundaresan, “Soot - a java bytecode optimization framework,” in Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research , ser. CASCON ’99. IBM Press, 1999, p. 13
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Arcuri and X. Yao, “Search based software testing of object-oriented containers,” Information Sciences , vol. 178, no. 15, pp. 3075–3095, 2008, nature Inspired Problem-Solving. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025507005609
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Harman and P. McMinn, “A theoretical and empirical study of search-based testing: Local, global, and hybrid search,” Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on , vol. 36, pp. 226 – 247, 05 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Fraser and A. Arcuri, “Evosuite: Automatic test suite generation for object-oriented software,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium and the 13th European Conference on Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE ’11. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2011, p. 416–419. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2025113.2025179
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Sakti, G. Pesant, and Y.-G. Guéhéneuc, “Instance generator and problem representation to improve object oriented code coverage,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 294–313, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Wang, M. Wen, Z. Liu, R. Wu, R. Wang, B. Yang, H. Yu, Z. Zhu, and S.-C. Cheung, “Do the dependency conflicts in my project matter?” in Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE 2018. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 319–330. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3236056
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Gao, S. H. Tan, Z. Dong, and A. Roychoudhury, “Android testing via synthetic symbolic execution,” ser. ASE ’18. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 419–429. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238225
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Noller, R. Kersten, and C. S. Păsăreanu, “Badger: complexity analysis with fuzzing and symbolic execution,” in Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on software testing and analysis , 2018, pp. 322–332
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Braione, G. Denaro, A. Mattavelli, and M. Pezzè, “Sushi: A test generator for programs with complex structured inputs,” in Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings , ser. ICSE ’18. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 21–24. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3183472
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Noller, C. Areanu, A. Fromherz, X. B. D Le, and W. Visser, “Symbolic pathfinder for sv-comp,” 03 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:160025533
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Petroni, T. Rocktäschel, P. Lewis, A. Bakhtin, Y. Wu, A. H. Miller, and S. Riedel, “Language models as knowledge bases?” 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Padhye, C. Lemieux, and K. Sen, “Jqf: Coverage-guided property-based testing in java,” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis , ser. ISSTA 2019. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, p. 398–401. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3293882.3339002
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Dong, M. Böhme, L. Cojocaru, and A. Roychoudhury, “Time-travel testing of android apps,” in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 481–492. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380402
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Gao, S. Biderman, S. Black, L. Golding, T. Hoppe, C. Foster, J. Phang, H. He, A. Thite, N. Nabeshima, S. Presser, and C. Leahy, “The pile: An 800gb dataset of diverse text for language modeling,” 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D. Amodei, “Language models are few-shot learners,” 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Sun, T. Su, J. Li, Z. Dong, G. Pu, T. Xie, and Z. Su, “Understanding and finding system setting-related defects in android apps,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis , ser. ISSTA 2021. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 204–215. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3460319.3464806
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Austin, A. Odena, M. Nye, M. Bosma, H. Michalewski, D. Dohan, E. Jiang, C. Cai, M. Terry, Q. Le, and C. Sutton, “Program synthesis with large language models,” 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Lin, Y. S. Ong, J. Sun, G. Fraser, and J. S. Dong, “Graph-based seed object synthesis for search-based unit testing,” in Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE 2021. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 1068–1080. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3468264.3468619
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
S. K. Gargari and M. R. Keyvanpour, “Sbst challenges from the perspective of the test techniques,” in 2021 12th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Technology (IKT) , 2021, pp. 119–123
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Chen, J. Tworek, H. Jun, Q. Yuan, H. P. de Oliveira Pinto, J. Kaplan, H. Edwards, Y. Burda, N. Joseph, G. Brockman, A. Ray, R. Puri, G. Krueger, M. Petrov, H. Khlaaf, G. Sastry, P. Mishkin, B. Chan, S. Gray, N. Ryder, M. Pavlov, A. Power, L. Kaiser, M. Bavarian, C. Winter, P. Tillet, F. P. Such, D. Cummings, M. Plappert, F. Chantzis, E. Barnes, A. Herbert-Voss, W. H. Guss, A. Nichol, A. Paino, N. Tezak, J. Tang, I. Babuschkin, S. Balaji, S. Jain, W. Saunders, C. Hesse, A. N. Carr, J. Leike, J. Achiam, V. Misra, E. Morikawa, A. Radford, M. Knight, M. Brundage, M. Murati, K. Mayer, P. Welinder, B. McGrew, D. Amodei, S. McCandlish, I. Sutskever, and W. Zaremba, “Evaluating large language models trained on code,” 2021
Y. Deng, C. S. Xia, H. Peng, C. Yang, and L. Zhang, “Large language models are zero-shot fuzzers: Fuzzing deep-learning libraries via large language models,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Deng, C. S. Xia, C. Yang, S. D. Zhang, S. Yang, and L. Zhang, “Large language models are edge-case fuzzers: Testing deep learning libraries via fuzzgpt,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Wikipedia contributors, “Complex number — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia,” 2023, [Online; accessed 15-December-2023]. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Complex_number&oldid=1187479457
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Blasi, A. Gorla, M. D. Ernst, and M. Pezzè, “Call me maybe: Using nlp to automatically generate unit test cases respecting temporal constraints,” in Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering , ser. ASE ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3551349.3556961
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
J. A. Prenner and R. Robbes, “Automatic program repair with openai’s codex: Evaluating quixbugs,” 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Reynolds and K. McDonell, “Prompt programming for large language models: Beyond the few-shot paradigm,” 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Meng, Z. Dong, J. Li, I. Beschastnikh, and A. Roychoudhury, “Linear-time temporal logic guided greybox fuzzing,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, p. 1343–1355. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510082
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Guo, Z. Dong, L. Shen, W. Tian, T. Su, and X. Peng, “Detecting and fixing data loss issues in android apps,” ser. ISSTA 2022. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, p. 605–616. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3533767.3534402
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Zeng, H. Tan, H. Zhang, J. Li, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang, “An extensive study on pre-trained models for program understanding and generation,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis , ser. ISSTA 2022. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, p. 39–51. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3533767.3534390
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Chowdhery, S. Narang, J. Devlin, M. Bosma, G. Mishra, A. Roberts, P. Barham, H. W. Chung, C. Sutton, S. Gehrmann, P. Schuh, K. Shi, S. Tsvyashchenko, J. Maynez, A. Rao, P. Barnes, Y. Tay, N. Shazeer, V. Prabhakaran, E. Reif, N. Du, B. Hutchinson, R. Pope, J. Bradbury, J. Austin, M. Isard, G. Gur-Ari, P. Yin, T. Duke, A. Levskaya, S. Ghemawat, S. Dev, H. Michalewski, X. Garcia, V. Misra, K. Robinson, L. Fedus, D. Zhou, D. Ippolito, D. Luan, H. Lim, B. Zoph, A. Spiridonov, R. Sepassi, D. Dohan, S. Agrawal, M. Omernick, A. M. Dai, T. S. Pillai, M. Pellat, A. Lewkowycz, E. Moreira, R. Child, O. Polozov, K. Lee, Z. Zhou, X. Wang, B. Saeta, M. Diaz, O. Firat, M. Catasta, J. Wei, K. Meier-Hellstern, D. Eck, J. Dean, S. Petrov, and N. Fiedel, “Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways,” 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Huang, P. Abbeel, D. Pathak, and I. Mordatch, “Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 9118–9147
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Chase, “LangChain,” Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Green and T. Avgerinos, “Graphfuzz: Library api fuzzing with lifetime-aware dataflow graphs,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, p. 1070–1081. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510228
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Xie, Y. Chen, C. Zhi, S. Deng, and J. Yin, “Chatunitest: a chatgpt-based automated unit test generation tool,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
E. Foundation, “Eclipse java development tools (jdt),” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core
2023
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI, “Gpt-4 technical report,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, A. Rodriguez, A. Joulin, E. Grave, and G. Lample, “Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
W. Jiao, W. Wang, J. tse Huang, X. Wang, S. Shi, and Z. Tu, “Is chatgpt a good translator? yes with gpt-4 as the engine,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Ma, Y. Cao, Y. Hong, and A. Sun, “Large language model is not a good few-shot information extractor, but a good reranker for hard samples!” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
D. Fried, A. Aghajanyan, J. Lin, S. Wang, E. Wallace, F. Shi, R. Zhong, W. tau Yih, L. Zettlemoyer, and M. Lewis, “Incoder: A generative model for code infilling and synthesis,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
C. S. Xia, Y. Wei, and L. Zhang, “Automated program repair in the era of large pre-trained language models,” in Proceedings of the 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, B. Ichter, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. Le, and D. Zhou, “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Artifacts of our work,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/FudanSELab/LISP
2024
Closest in time.
Wikipedia contributors, “Fermat’s little theorem — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia,” 2024, [Online; accessed 22-March-2024]. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fermat%27s_little_theorem&oldid=1193612930
2024
Closest in time.
OpenAI, “Openai api pricing,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openai.com/api/pricing/
2024
Closest in time.