Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The ability to revise essays in response to feedback is important for students' writing success.
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
J. Richard Landis and Gary Koch. 1977 · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assessing students’ skills at writing analytically in response to texts
Richard Correnti, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, Laura Hamilton, and Elaine Wang. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Feedback and revising in an intelligent tutoring system for writing strategies
Rod D. Roscoe, Erica L. Snow, and Danielle S. McNamara. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
GloVe: Global vectors for word representation
Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Research-based writing practices and the common core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis
Steve Graham, Karen R Harris, and Tanya Santangelo. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Argrewrite: A web-based revision assistant for argumentative writings
Fan Zhang, Rebecca Hwa, Diane Litman, and Homa B Hashemi. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Argue with me: Argument as a path to developing students’ thinking and writing
Deanna Kuhn, Laura Hemberger, and Valerie Khait. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assessing students’ use of evidence and organization in response-to-text writing: Using natural language processing for rubric-based automated scoring
Zahra Rahimi, Diane Litman, Richard Correnti, Elaine Wang, and Lindsay Clare Matsumura. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A corpus of annotated revisions for studying argumentative writing
Fan Zhang, Homa B. Hashemi, Rebecca Hwa, and Diane Litman. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Understanding revisions in student writing through revision graphs
Antonette Shibani, Simon Knight, and Simon Buckingham Shum. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distilbert, a distilled version of bert: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Victor Sanh, Lysandre Debut, Julien Chaumond, and Thomas Wolf. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
erevise: Using natural language processing to provide formative feedback on text evidence usage in student writing
Haoran Zhang, Ahmed Magooda, Diane Litman, Richard Correnti, Elaine Wang, LC Matsmura, Emily Howe, and Rafael Quintana. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Annotation and classification of evidence and reasoning revisions in argumentative writing
Tazin Afrin, Elaine Lin Wang, Diane Litman, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, and Richard Correnti. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
wikiHowToImprove: A resource and analyses on edits in instructional texts
Talita Anthonio, Irshad Bhat, and Michael Roth. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Expanding automated writing evaluation
Jill Burstein, Brian Riordan, and Daniel McCaffrey. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
erevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system
Elaine Lin Wang, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, Richard Correnti, Diane Litman, Haoran Zhang, Emily Howe, Ahmed Magooda, and Rafael Quintana. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated topical component extraction using neural network attention scores from source-based essay scoring
Haoran Zhang and Diane Litman. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Leveraging prefix transfer for multi-intent text revision
Ruining Chong, Cunliang Kong, Liu Wu, Zhenghao Liu, Ziye Jin, Liner Yang, Yange Fan, Hanghang Fan, and Erhong Yang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Automated feedback and writing: A multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students’ performance
Johanna Fleckenstein, Lucas W Liebenow, and Jennifer Meyer. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Automated written corrective feedback in Research Paper Revision: The good, the bad, and the missing
Qian Guo, Ruiling Feng, and Yuanfang Hua. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A systematic review of automated writing evaluation systems
Shi Huawei and Vahid Aryadoust. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Predicting the quality of revisions in argumentative writing
Zhexiong Liu, Diane Litman, Elaine Wang, Lindsay Matsumura, and Richard Correnti. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Automated feedback and automated scoring in the elementary grades: Usage, attitudes, and associations with writing outcomes in a districtwide implementation of mi write
Joshua Wilson, Yue Huang, Corey Palermo, Gaysha Beard, and Charles A MacArthur. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Essay quality signals as weak supervision for source-based essay scoring
Haoran Zhang and Diane Litman. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Building a validity argument for an automated writing evaluation system (erevise) as a formative assessment
Richard Correnti, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, Elaine Lin Wang, Diane Litman, and Haoran Zhang. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Understanding iterative revision from human-written text
Wanyu Du, Vipul Raheja, Dhruv Kumar, Zae Myung Kim, Melissa Lopez, and Dongyeop Kang. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Argrewrite v.2: an annotated argumentative revisions corpus
Omid Kashefi, Tazin Afrin, Meghan Dale, Christopher Olshefski, Amanda Godley, Diane Litman, and Rebecca Hwa. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
An automated writing evaluation system for supporting self-monitored revising
Diane Litman, Tazin Afrin, Omid Kashefi, Christopher Olshefski, Amanda Godley, and Rebecca Hwa. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Bertalign: Improved word embedding-based sentence alignment for chinese–english parallel corpora of literary texts
Lei Liu and Min Zhu. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Shabnam Behzad, Omid Kashefi, and Swapna Somasundaran. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Supporting students’ text-based evidence use via formative automated writing and revision assessment
Rip Correnti, Elaine Lin Wang, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, Diane Litman, Zhexiong Liu, and Tianwen Li. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
ARIES: A corpus of scientific paper edits made in response to peer reviews
Mike D’Arcy, Alexis Ross, Erin Bransom, Bailey Kuehl, Jonathan Bragg, Tom Hope, and Doug Downey. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
CASIMIR: A corpus of scientific articles enhanced with multiple author-integrated revisions
Léane Jourdan, Florian Boudin, Nicolas Hernandez, and Richard Dufour. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Using large language models to assess young students’ writing revisions
Tianwen Li, Zhexiong Liu, Lindsay Matsumura, Elaine Wang, Diane Litman, and Richard Correnti. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Towards automated document revision: Grammatical error correction, fluency edits, and beyond
Masato Mita, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Masato Hagiwara, Tomoya Mizumoto, Jun Suzuki, and Kentaro Inui. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
LLM-based rewriting of inappropriate argumentation using reinforcement learning from machine feedback
Timon Ziegenbein, Gabriella Skitalinskaya, Alireza Bayat Makou, and Henning Wachsmuth. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.