Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In this paper, we evaluate the capability of large language models to conduct personalized phishing attacks and compare their performance with human experts and AI models from last year.
R. Dhamija, J. D. Tygar, and M. Hearst, “Why phishing works,” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings , vol. 1, pp. 581–590, 2006. [Online]. Available: www.paypa1.com
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. B. Cialdini, Influence: The psychology of persuasion . Collins New York, 2007, vol. 55
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Houser, “Could what happened to sony happen to us?” IT Professional , vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 54–57, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Hadnagy, Social Engineering: The Science of Human Hacking . John Wiley & Sons, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Agrafiotis, J. R. C. Nurse, M. Goldsmith, S. Creese, and D. Upton, “A taxonomy of cyber-harms: Defining the impacts of cyber-attacks and understanding how they propagate,” Journal of Cybersecurity , vol. 4, no. 1, p. tyy006, 10 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyy006
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. v. d. Heijden and L. Allodi, Cognitive Triaging of Phishing Attacks , 2019. [Online]. Available: www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity19/presentation/van-der-heijden
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, “Internet crime complaint center 2019 internet crime report,” Federal Bureau of Investigation, Annual Report, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ic3.gov/AnnualReport/Reports/2019_IC3Report.pdf
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Gangavarapu, C. Jaidhar, and B. Chanduka, “Applicability of machine learning in spam and phishing email filtering: review and approaches,” Artificial Intelligence Review , vol. 53, pp. 5019–5081, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Maneriker, J. W. Stokes, E. G. Lazo, D. Carutasu, F. Tajaddodianfar, and A. Gururajan, “URLTran: Improving Phishing URL Detection Using Transformers,” Proceedings - IEEE Military Communications Conference MILCOM , vol. 2021-November, pp. 197–204, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Basit, M. Zafar, X. Liu, A. R. Javed, Z. Jalil, and K. Kifayat, “A comprehensive survey of ai-enabled phishing attacks detection techniques,” Telecommunication Systems , vol. 76, pp. 139–154, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vishwanath, The Weakest Link: How to Diagnose, Detect, and Defend Users from Phishing . MIT Press, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Technologies, “Cybersecurity threatscape: Q3 2022,” 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Misra and J. T. Rayz, “LMs go Phishing: Adapting Pre-trained Language Models to Detect Phishing Emails,” Proceedings - 2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, WI-IAT 2022 , pp. 135–142, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Q. Do, A. Selamat, O. Krejcar, E. Herrera-Viedma, and H. Fujita, “Deep learning for phishing detection: Taxonomy, current challenges and future directions,” IEEE Access , vol. 10, pp. 36 429–36 463, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Begou, J. Vinoy, A. Duda, and M. Korczynski, “Exploring the Dark Side of AI: Advanced Phishing Attack Design and Deployment Using ChatGPT,” 2023 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security, CNS 2023 , 2023
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Karinshak, S. X. Liu, J. S. Park, and J. T. Hancock, “Working With AI to Persuade: Examining a Large Language Model’s Ability to Generate Pro-Vaccination Messages,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , vol. 7, no. CSCW1, 4 2023. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579592
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Casino giant MGM expects $100 million hit from hack that led to data breach | Reuters.” [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/business/mgm-expects-cybersecurity-issue-negatively-impact-third-quarter-earnings-2023-10-05/
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Sharma, K. Singh, P. Aggarwal, and V. Dutt, “How well does GPT phish people? An investigation involving cognitive biases and feedback,” Proceedings - 8th IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops, Euro S and PW 2023 , pp. 451–457, 2023
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
S. W. Guo, T. C. Chen, H. J. Wang, F. Y. Leu, and Y. C. Fan, “Generating Personalized Phishing Emails for Social Engineering Training Based on Neural Language Models,” Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems , vol. 570 LNNS, pp. 270–281, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20029-8_26
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Heiding, B. Schneier, A. Vishwanath, J. Bernstein, and P. S. Park, “Devising and Detecting Phishing Emails Using Large Language Models,” IEEE Access , vol. 12, pp. 42 131–42 146, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
E. Durmus, L. Lovitt, A. Tamkin, S. Ritchie, J. Clark, and D. Ganguli, “Measuring the persuasiveness of language models,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.anthropic.com/news/measuring-model-persuasiveness
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Wang, W. Zhu, H. Xu, Z. Qin, K. Ren, and W. Ma, “A Large-Scale Pretrained Deep Model for Phishing URL Detection,” pp. 1–5, 5 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Apruzzese, P. Laskov, and J. Schneider, “SoK: Pragmatic Assessment of Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection,” Proceedings - 8th IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, Euro S and P 2023 , pp. 592–614, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
P. G. Qi, A. Xin, Y. Li, Y. Liu, T. Zhang, and Y. Liu, Knowledge Expansion and Counterfactual Interaction for {
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Ploug, “The right not to be subjected to ai profiling based on publicly available data—privacy and the exceptionalism of ai profiling,” Philosophy & Technology , vol. 36, no. 14, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00616-9
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
S. S. Roy, P. Thota, K. V. Naragam, and S. Nilizadeh, “From Chatbots to Phishbots?: Phishing Scam Generation in Commercial Large Language Models,” 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) , pp. 36–54, 5 2024
2024
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
R. Liu, Y. Lin, X. Teoh, G. Liu, Z. Huang, and J. S. Dong, Less Defined Knowledge and More True Alarms: Reference-based Phishing Detection without a Pre-defined Reference List . USENIX Association, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity24/presentation/zhang-zhenkai
2024
Closest in time.
OpenAI, “Gpt-4o: Openai’s language model,” 2024, https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-fine-tuning
2024
Closest in time.
Anthropic, “Claude 3.5 sonnet: Anthropic’s language model,” 2024, https://www.anthropic.com/index/claude-3.5-sonnet
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Anthropic, “Introducing computer use, a new claude 3.5 sonnet, and claude 3.5 haiku,” Anthropic News , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.anthropic.com/news/3-5-models-and-computer-use
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.