Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential as general evaluators along with the evident benefits of speed and cost.
Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data
Andrew F Hayes and Klaus Krippendorff. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback
Yuntao Bai, Andy Jones, Kamal Ndousse, Amanda Askell, Anna Chen, Nova DasSarma, Dawn Drain, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, et al. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
TruthfulQA: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods
Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
WANLI: Worker and AI collaboration for natural language inference dataset creation
Alisa Liu, Swabha Swayamdipta, Noah A. Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
A closer look into using large language models for automatic evaluation
Cheng-Han Chiang and Hung-yi Lee. 2023b · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chatgpt outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks
Fabrizio Gilardi, Meysam Alizadeh, and Maël Kubli. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Camels in a changing climate: Enhancing lm adaptation with tulu 2
Hamish Ivison, Yizhong Wang, Valentina Pyatkin, Nathan Lambert, Matthew Peters, Pradeep Dasigi, Joel Jang, David Wadden, Noah A. Smith, Iz Beltagy, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Consistency analysis of chatgpt
Myeongjun Erik Jang and Thomas Lukasiewicz. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, Lélio Renard Lavaud, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timothée Lacroix, and William El Sayed. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Alpacaeval: An automatic evaluator of instruction-following models
Xuechen Li, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Holistic evaluation of language models
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, Benjamin Newman, Binhang Yuan, Bobby Yan, Ce Zhang, Christian Alexander Cosgrove, Christopher D Manning, Christopher Re, Diana Acosta-Navas, Drew Arad Hudson, Eric Zelikman, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Frieda Rong, Hongyu Ren, Huaxiu Yao, Jue WANG, Keshav Santhanam, Laurel Orr, Lucia Zheng, Mert Yuksekgonul, Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Kim, Neel Guha, Niladri S. Chatterji, Omar Khattab, Peter Henderson, Qian Huang, Ryan Andrew Chi, Sang Michael Xie, Shibani Santurkar, Surya Ganguli, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Thomas Icard, Tianyi Zhang, Vishrav Chaudhary, William Wang, Xuechen Li, Yifan Mai, Yuhui Zhang, and Yuta Koreeda. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment
Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
LIMA: Less is more for alignment
Chunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srini Iyer, Jiao Sun, Yuning Mao, Xuezhe Ma, Avia Efrat, Ping Yu, LILI YU, Susan Zhang, Gargi Ghosh, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Omer Levy. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Length-controlled alpacaeval: A simple debiasing of automatic evaluators
Yann Dubois, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
GPTScore: Evaluate as you desire
Jinlan Fu, See-Kiong Ng, Zhengbao Jiang, and Pengfei Liu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Prometheus 2: An open source language model specialized in evaluating other language models
Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Shayne Longpre, Bill Yuchen Lin, Jamin Shin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, and Minjoon Seo. 2024b · 2024
Closest in time.
From live data to high-quality benchmarks: The arena-hard pipeline
Tianle Li, Wei-Lin Chiang, Evan Frick, Lisa Dunlap, Banghua Zhu, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models
Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fernandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Saghar Hosseini, Rui Hou, Hakan Inan, Marcin Kardas, Viktor Kerkez, Madian Khabsa, Isabel Kloumann, Artem Korenev, Punit Singh Koura, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Thibaut Lavril, Jenya Lee, Diana Liskovich, Yinghai Lu, Yuning Mao, Xavier Martinet, Todor Mihaylov, Pushkar Mishra, Igor Molybog, Yixin Nie, Andrew Poulton, Jeremy Reizenstein, Rashi Rungta, Kalyan Saladi, Alan Schelten, Ruan Silva, Eric Michael Smith, Ranjan Subramanian, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Binh Tang, Ross Taylor, Adina Williams, Jian Xiang Kuan, Puxin Xu, Zheng Yan, Iliyan Zarov, Yuchen Zhang, Angela Fan, Melanie Kambadur, Sharan Narang, Aurelien Rodriguez, Robert Stojnic, Sergey Edunov, and Thomas Scialom. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Zephyr: Direct distillation of lm alignment
Lewis Tunstall, Edward Beeching, Nathan Lambert, Nazneen Rajani, Kashif Rasul, Younes Belkada, Shengyi Huang, Leandro von Werra, Clémentine Fourrier, Nathan Habib, Nathan Sarrazin, Omar Sanseviero, Alexander M. Rush, and Thomas Wolf. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models
Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V Le, Ed H. Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, and Denny Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-bench and chatbot arena
Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Can large language models be an alternative to human evaluations?
Cheng-Han Chiang and Hung-yi Lee. 2023a
Cited in the paper.
Prometheus: Inducing fine-grained evaluation capability in language models
Seungone Kim, Jamin Shin, Yejin Cho, Joel Jang, Shayne Longpre, Hwaran Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Seongjin Shin, Sungdong Kim, James Thorne, and Minjoon Seo. 2024a
Cited in the paper.
Rickard Stureborg, Dimitris Alikaniotis, and Yoshi Suhara. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Evaluating the zero-shot robustness of instruction-tuned language models
Jiuding Sun, Chantal Shaib, and Byron C Wallace. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
FLASK: Fine-grained language model evaluation based on alignment skill sets
Seonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim, Sungdong Kim, Hyeonbin Hwang, Seungone Kim, Yongrae Jo, James Thorne, Juho Kim, and Minjoon Seo. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.