Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Factuality evaluation aims to detect factual errors produced by language models (LMs) and hence guide the development of more factual models.
Fine-tuning language models from human preferences
Daniel M. Ziegler, Nisan Stiennon, Jeffrey Wu, Tom B. Brown, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, Paul Christiano, and Geoffrey Irving. 2020 · 1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization
Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet, and Ryan Thomas Mcdonald. 2020 · 1919
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural text generation from structured data with application to the biography domain
Rémi Lebret, David Grangier, and Michael Auli. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Get to the point: Summarization with pointer-generator networks
Abigail See, Peter J. Liu, and Christopher D. Manning. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ms marco: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset
Payal Bajaj, Daniel Campos, Nick Craswell, Li Deng, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong Liu, Rangan Majumder, Andrew McNamara, Bhaskar Mitra, Tri Nguyen, Mir Rosenberg, Xia Song, Alina Stoica, Saurabh Tiwary, and Tong Wang. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Don’t give me the details, just the summary! topic-aware convolutional neural networks for extreme summarization
Shashi Narayan, Shay B. Cohen, and Mirella Lapata. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A dataset for document grounded conversations
Kangyan Zhou, Shrimai Prabhumoye, and Alan W Black. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wizard of wikipedia: Knowledge-powered conversational agents
Emily Dinan, Stephen Roller, Kurt Shuster, Angela Fan, Michael Auli, and Jason Weston. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Asking and answering questions to evaluate the factual consistency of summaries
Alex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, and Mike Lewis. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
q 2 q^{2} : Evaluating factual consistency in knowledge-grounded dialogues via question generation and question answering
Or Honovich, Leshem Choshen, Roee Aharoni, Ella Neeman, Idan Szpektor, and Omri Abend. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Understanding factuality in abstractive summarization with FRANK: A benchmark for factuality metrics
Artidoro Pagnoni, Vidhisha Balachandran, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Get your vitamin C! robust fact verification with contrastive evidence
Tal Schuster, Adam Fisch, and Regina Barzilay. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Internet-augmented language models through few-shot prompting for open-domain question answering
Angeliki Lazaridou, Elena Gribovskaya, Wojciech Stokowiec, and Nikolai Grigorev. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotes
Jacob Menick, Maja Trebacz, Vladimir Mikulik, John Aslanides, Francis Song, Martin Chadwick, Mia Glaese, Susannah Young, Lucy Campbell-Gillingham, Geoffrey Irving, and Nat McAleese. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Large dual encoders are generalizable retrievers
Jianmo Ni, Chen Qu, Jing Lu, Zhuyun Dai, Gustavo Hernandez Abrego, Ji Ma, Vincent Zhao, Yi Luan, Keith Hall, Ming-Wei Chang, and Yinfei Yang. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Talm: Tool augmented language models
Aaron Parisi, Yao Zhao, and Noah Fiedel. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators
William Saunders, Catherine Yeh, Jeff Wu, Steven Bills, Long Ouyang, Jonathan Ward, and Jan Leike. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
I-Chun Chern, Steffi Chern, Shiqi Chen, Weizhe Yuan, Kehua Feng, Chunting Zhou, Junxian He, Graham Neubig, and Pengfei Liu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Visual programming for step-by-step text-to-image generation and evaluation
Jaemin Cho, Abhay Zala, and Mohit Bansal. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Large language models can self-improve
Jiaxin Huang, Shixiang Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu, Xuezhi Wang, Hongkun Yu, and Jiawei Han. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
HaluEval: A large-scale hallucination evaluation benchmark for large language models
Junyi Li, Xiaoxue Cheng, Xin Zhao, Jian-Yun Nie, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023a · 2023
Does fine-tuning llms on new knowledge encourage hallucinations?
Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal, Amir Feder, Roi Reichart, and Jonathan Herzig. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Understanding finetuning for factual knowledge extraction
Gaurav Rohit Ghosal, Tatsunori Hashimoto, and Aditi Raghunathan. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
CRITIC: Large language models can self-correct with tool-interactive critiquing
Zhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, yelong shen, Yujiu Yang, Nan Duan, and Weizhu Chen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Tigerscore: Towards building explainable metric for all text generation tasks
Dongfu Jiang, Yishan Li, Ge Zhang, Wenhao Huang, Bill Yuchen Lin, and Wenhu Chen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Prometheus: Inducing fine-grained evaluation capability in language models
Seungone Kim, Jamin Shin, Yejin Cho, Joel Jang, Shayne Longpre, Hwaran Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Seongjin Shin, Sungdong Kim, James Thorne, and Minjoon Seo. 2024 · 2024
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback
Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, Shashank Gupta, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Katherine Hermann, Sean Welleck, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, and Peter Clark. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
FActScore: Fine-grained atomic evaluation of factual precision in long form text generation
Sewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Pang Koh, Mohit Iyyer, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model
Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Stefano Ermon, Christopher D. Manning, and Chelsea Finn. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools
Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessi, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Toolalpaca: Generalized tool learning for language models with 3000 simulated cases
Qiaoyu Tang, Ziliang Deng, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Qiao Liang, Boxi Cao, and Le Sun. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Shepherd: A critic for language model generation
Tianlu Wang, Ping Yu, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Sean O’Brien, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Olga Golovneva, Luke Zettlemoyer, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, and Asli Celikyilmaz. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Generating sequences by learning to self-correct
Sean Welleck, Ximing Lu, Peter West, Faeze Brahman, Tianxiao Shen, Daniel Khashabi, and Yejin Choi. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
Fine-grained hallucination detection and editing for language models
Abhika Mishra, Akari Asai, Vidhisha Balachandran, Yizhong Wang, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
RAGTruth: A hallucination corpus for developing trustworthy retrieval-augmented language models
Cheng Niu, Yuanhao Wu, Juno Zhu, Siliang Xu, KaShun Shum, Randy Zhong, Juntong Song, and Tong Zhang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Trusting your evidence: Hallucinate less with context-aware decoding
Weijia Shi, Xiaochuang Han, Mike Lewis, Yulia Tsvetkov, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Wen-tau Yih. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Minicheck: Efficient fact-checking of llms on grounding documents
Liyan Tang, Philippe Laban, and Greg Durrett. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Fine-tuning language models for factuality
Katherine Tian, Eric Mitchell, Huaxiu Yao, Christopher D Manning, and Chelsea Finn. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Foundational autoraters: Taming large language models for better automatic evaluation
Tu Vu, Kalpesh Krishna, Salaheddin Alzubi, Chris Tar, Manaal Faruqui, and Yun-Hsuan Sung. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Long-form factuality in large language models
Jerry Wei, Chengrun Yang, Xinying Song, Yifeng Lu, Nathan Hu, Jie Huang, Dustin Tran, Daiyi Peng, Ruibo Liu, Da Huang, Cosmo Du, and Quoc V. Le. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Doclens: Multi-aspect fine-grained evaluation for medical text generation
Yiqing Xie, Sheng Zhang, Hao Cheng, Pengfei Liu, Zelalem Gero, Cliff Wong, Tristan Naumann, Hoifung Poon, and Carolyn Rose. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Pride and prejudice: Llm amplifies self-bias in self-refinement
Wenda Xu, Guanglei Zhu, Xuandong Zhao, Liangming Pan, Lei Li, and William Yang Wang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.