Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The immutable nature of blockchain technology, while revolutionary, introduces significant security challenges, particularly in smart contracts.
Smart contracts: building blocks for digital markets
Nick Szabo. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Making smart contracts smarter. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security . 254–269
Loi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena, and Aquinas Hobor. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey of attacks on ethereum smart contracts (sok). In Principles of Security and Trust: 6th International Conference, POST 2017, Held as Part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2017, Uppsala, Sweden, April 22-29, 2017, Proceedings 6 . 164–186
Nicola Atzei, Massimo Bartoletti, and Tiziana Cimoli. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Securify: Practical security analysis of smart contracts. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security . 67–82
Petar Tsankov, Andrei Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais, Florian Buenzli, and Martin Vechev. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Slither: a static analysis framework for smart contracts. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Engineering for Blockchain (WETSEB) . IEEE, 8–15
Josselin Feist, Gustavo Grieco, and Alex Groce. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey on ethereum systems security: Vulnerabilities, attacks, and defenses
Huashan Chen, Marcus Pendleton, Laurent Njilla, and Shouhuai Xu. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey of the state of explainable AI for natural language processing
Marina Danilevsky, Kun Qian, Ranit Aharonov, Yannis Katsis, Ban Kawas, and Prithviraj Sen. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
sfuzz: An efficient adaptive fuzzer for solidity smart contracts. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . 778–788
Tai D Nguyen, Long H Pham, Jun Sun, Yun Lin, and Quang Tran Minh. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Verismart: A highly precise safety verifier for ethereum smart contracts. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) . IEEE, 1678–1694
Sunbeom So, Myungho Lee, Jisu Park, Heejo Lee, and Hakjoo Oh. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Eth2vec: learning contract-wide code representations for vulnerability detection on ethereum smart contracts. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on blockchain and secure critical infrastructure . 47–59
Nami Ashizawa, Naoto Yanai, Jason Paul Cruz, and Shingo Okamura. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey of smart contract formal specification and verification
Palina Tolmach, Yi Li, Shang-Wei Lin, Yang Liu, and Zengxiang Li. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Confuzzius: A data dependency-aware hybrid fuzzer for smart contracts. In 2021 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) . IEEE, 103–119
Christof Ferreira Torres, Antonio Ken Iannillo, Arthur Gervais, and Radu State. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Smart contract vulnerability detection using graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence . 3283–3290
Yuan Zhuang, Zhenguang Liu, Peng Qian, Qi Liu, Xiang Wang, and Qinming He. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
An empirical study of market inefficiencies in Uniswap and SushiSwap. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC) . Springer, 238–249
Jan Arvid Berg, Robin Fritsch, Lioba Heimbach, and Roger Wattenhofer. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gpt-neox-20b: An open-source autoregressive language model
Sid Black, Stella Biderman, Eric Hallahan, Quentin Anthony, Leo Gao, Laurence Golding, Horace He, Connor Leahy, Kyle McDonell, Jason Phang, et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents
Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
A systematic evaluation of large language models of code. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Machine Programming . 1–10
Frank F Xu, Uri Alon, Graham Neubig, and Vincent Josua Hellendoorn. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models
Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Large language models and the perils of their hallucinations
Razvan Azamfirei, Sapna R Kudchadkar, and James Fackler. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
When ChatGPT Meets Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: How Far Are We?
Chong Chen, Jianzhong Su, Jiachi Chen, Yanlin Wang, Tingting Bi, Yanli Wang, Xingwei Lin, Ting Chen, and Zibin Zheng. 2023b · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversation framework
Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Shaokun Zhang, Erkang Zhu, Beibin Li, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, and Chi Wang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Auto-gpt for online decision making: Benchmarks and additional opinions
Hui Yang, Sifu Yue, and Yunzhong He. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A survey on large language models for software engineering
Quanjun Zhang, Chunrong Fang, Yang Xie, Yaxin Zhang, Yun Yang, Weisong Sun, Shengcheng Yu, and Zhenyu Chen. 2023a · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Demystifying exploitable bugs in smart contracts. In 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . IEEE, 615–627
Zhuo Zhang, Brian Zhang, Wen Xu, and Zhiqiang Lin. 2023b · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Isaac David, Liyi Zhou, Kaihua Qin, Dawn Song, Lorenzo Cavallaro, and Arthur Gervais. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
DeFillama Dashboard
DeFillama. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Self-collaboration code generation via chatgpt
Yihong Dong, Xue Jiang, Zhi Jin, and Ge Li. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Art and the science of generative AI
Ziv Epstein, Aaron Hertzmann, Investigators of Human Creativity, Memo Akten, Hany Farid, Jessica Fjeld, Morgan R Frank, Matthew Groh, Laura Herman, Neil Leach, et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Large language models are few-shot testers: Exploring llm-based general bug reproduction. In 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . IEEE, 2312–2323
Sungmin Kang, Juyeon Yoon, and Shin Yoo. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Understanding the effectiveness of large language models in detecting security vulnerabilities
Avishree Khare, Saikat Dutta, Ziyang Li, Alaia Solko-Breslin, Rajeev Alur, and Mayur Naik. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large scale language model society
Guohao Li, Hasan Abed Al Kader Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin, and Bernard Ghanem. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate
Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Wenxiang Jiao, Xing Wang, Yan Wang, Rui Wang, Yujiu Yang, Zhaopeng Tu, and Shuming Shi. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Sok: Decentralized finance (defi) attacks. In 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) . IEEE, 2444–2461
Liyi Zhou, Xihan Xiong, Jens Ernstberger, Stefanos Chaliasos, Zhipeng Wang, Ye Wang, Kaihua Qin, Roger Wattenhofer, Dawn Song, and Arthur Gervais. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
code4rena
2023 · 2024
Closest in time.
“Mythril
MythX development team. 2023 · 2024
Closest in time.
Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, et al · 2024
Closest in time.
Introduction
LangChain. 2023 · 2024
Closest in time.
Smart Contract Audits Cost: Why are They So Expensive?
Raczyński Mateusz. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Hugginggpt: Solving ai tasks with chatgpt and its friends in hugging face
Yongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li, Weiming Lu, and Yueting Zhuang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
LLM4Fuzz: Guided Fuzzing of Smart Contracts with Large Language Models
Chaofan Shou, Jing Liu, Doudou Lu, and Koushik Sen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
LLM4Vuln: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Decoupling and Enhancing LLMs’ Vulnerability Reasoning
Yuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu, Wei Ma, Lyuye Zhang, Miaolei Shi, and Yang Liu. 2024a · 2024
Closest in time.
Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology
Gemma Team, Thomas Mesnard, Cassidy Hardin, Robert Dadashi, Surya Bhupatiraju, Shreya Pathak, Laurent Sifre, Morgane Rivière, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Juliette Love, et al · 2024
Closest in time.
Buffer of Thoughts: Thought-Augmented Reasoning with Large Language Models
Ling Yang, Zhaochen Yu, Tianjun Zhang, Shiyi Cao, Minkai Xu, Wentao Zhang, Joseph E Gonzalez, and Bin Cui. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.