Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
While personalized recommendations are often desired by users, it can be difficult in practice to distinguish cases of bias from cases of personalization: we find that models generate racially stereotypical recommendations regardless of whether the user revealed their identity intentionally through explicit indications or unintentionally through implicit cues.
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.: Education)
U.S. Code. 1965 · 1965
Earlier work this paper cites.
Social differentiation and sports participation: The case of golf
James D Davidson. 1982 · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Codeswitching: Black english and standard english in the african-american linguistic repertoire
Charles E DeBose. 1992 · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Do i sound" asian" to you?: Linguistic markers of asian american identity
David B Hanna. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Standard english: What it isn’t
Peter Trudgill. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ratcliff/obershelp pattern recognition
Paul E Black. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Appropriation of african american slang by asian american youth 1
Angela Reyes. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
What is dialect?
Thomas E Murray and Beth Lee Simon. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Racial and ethnic diversity at hbcus: What can be learned when whites are in the minority?
Rosemary B Closson and Wilma J Henry. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Re-thinking intersectionality
Jennifer C. Nash. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
2 The Americas and the Caribbean
Edgar W. Schneider, editor. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deconstructing the model minority myth and how it contributes to the invisible minority reality in higher education research
Samuel D Museus and Peter N Kiang. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
2010 Census
U.S. Census Bureau. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Racial categorization in the 2010 census
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 2009 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness in recommender systems
Michael D Ekstrand, Anubrata Das, Robin Burke, and Fernando Diaz. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
ACS demographic and housing estimates
U.S. Census Bureau. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
The problem with bias: Allocative versus representational harms in machine learning
Solon Barocas, Kate Crawford, Aaron Shapiro, and Hanna Wallach. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Aylin Caliskan, Joanna J Bryson, and Arvind Narayanan. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Should i follow the crowd? a probabilistic analysis of the effectiveness of popularity in recommender systems
Rocío Cañamares and Pablo Castells. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes
Nikhil Garg, Londa Schiebinger, Dan Jurafsky, and James Zou. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data
Milena A Gianfrancesco, Suzanne Tamang, Jinoos Yazdany, and Gabriela Schmajuk. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Conversational recommender system
Yueming Sun and Yi Zhang. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Word embeddings (also) encode human personality stereotypes
Oshin Agarwal, Funda Durupınar, Norman I Badler, and Ani Nenkova. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Lipstick on a pig: Debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them
Hila Gonen and Yoav Goldberg. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Doing Pragmatics , 4th ed. edition
Peter. Grundy. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The risk of racial bias in hate speech detection
Maarten Sap, Dallas Card, Saadia Gabriel, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith. 2019 · 2019
“kelly is a warm person, joseph is a role model”: Gender biases in LLM-generated reference letters
Yixin Wan, George Pu, Jiao Sun, Aparna Garimella, Kai-Wei Chang, and Nanyun Peng. 2023a · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“kelly is a warm person, joseph is a role model”: Gender biases in llm-generated reference letters
Yixin Wan, George Pu, Jiao Sun, Aparna Garimella, Kai-Wei Chang, and Nanyun Peng. 2023b · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Palr: Personalization aware llms for recommendation
Fan Yang, Zheng Chen, Ziyan Jiang, Eunah Cho, Xiaojiang Huang, and Yanbin Lu. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Is chatgpt fair for recommendation? evaluating fairness in large language model recommendation
Jizhi Zhang, Keqin Bao, Yang Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Explainability for large language models: A survey
Haiyan Zhao, Hanjie Chen, F. Yang, Ninghao Liu, Huiqi Deng, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, and Mengnan Du. 2023 · 2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
(un) informed consent: Studying gdpr consent notices in the field
Christine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub, and Thorsten Holz. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Producing white comfort through “corporate cool”: Linguistic appropriation, social media, and@ brandssayingbae
Jennifer Roth-Gordon, Jessica Harris, and Stephanie Zamora. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Bold: Dataset and metrics for measuring biases in open-ended language generation
Jwala Dhamala, Tony Sun, Varun Kumar, Satyapriya Krishna, Yada Pruksachatkun, Kai-Wei Chang, and Rahul Gupta. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Five sources of bias in natural language processing
Dirk Hovy and Shrimai Prabhumoye. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
The legacy of structural racism: associations between historic redlining, current mortgage lending, and health
Emily E Lynch, Lorraine Halinka Malcoe, Sarah E Laurent, Jason Richardson, Bruce C Mitchell, and Helen CS Meier. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Aligning multidimensional worldviews and discovering ideological differences
Jeremiah Milbauer, Adarsh Mathew, and James Evans. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in large language models
Shaily Bhatt and Fernando Diaz. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Open (clinical) llms are sensitive to instruction phrasings
Alberto Mario Ceballos-Arroyo, Monica Munnangi, Jiuding Sun, Karen Zhang, Jered Mcinerney, Byron C Wallace, and Silvio Amir. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Designing a dashboard for transparency and control of conversational ai
Yida Chen, Aoyu Wu, Trevor DePodesta, Catherine Yeh, Kenneth Li, Nicholas Castillo Marin, Oam Patel, Jan Riecke, Shivam Raval, Olivia Seow, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Understanding the impacts of language technologies’ performance disparities on African American language speakers
Jay Cunningham, Su Lin Blodgett, Michael Madaio, Hal Daumé Iii, Christina Harrington, and Hanna Wallach. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Bias and unfairness in information retrieval systems: New challenges in the llm era
Sunhao Dai, Chen Xu, Shicheng Xu, Liang Pang, Zhenhua Dong, and Jun Xu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Llms for knowledge modeling: Nlp approach to constructing user knowledge models for personalized education
Diana Domenichini, Filippo Chiarello, Vito Giordano, and Gualtiero Fantoni. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
The life cycle of large language models in education: A framework for understanding sources of bias
Jinsook Lee, Yann Hicke, Renzhe Yu, Christopher Brooks, and René F Kizilcec. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
AboutMe: Using self-descriptions in webpages to document the effects of English pretraining data filters
Li Lucy, Suchin Gururangan, Luca Soldaini, Emma Strubell, David Bamman, Lauren Klein, and Jesse Dodge. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Political compass or spinning arrow? towards more meaningful evaluations for values and opinions in large language models
Paul Röttger, Valentin Hofmann, Valentina Pyatkin, Musashi Hinck, Hannah Kirk, Hinrich Schuetze, and Dirk Hovy. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Who is better at math, jenny or jingzhen? uncovering stereotypes in large language models
Zara Siddique, Liam Turner, and Luis Espinosa-Anke. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? a case study in survey design
Lindia Tjuatja, Valerie Chen, Tongshuang Wu, Ameet Talwalkwar, and Graham Neubig. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
College scorecard
U.S. Department of Education. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Understanding user experience in large language model interactions
Jiayin Wang, Weizhi Ma, Peijie Sun, Min Zhang, and Jian-Yun Nie. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
A study of implicit ranking unfairness in large language models
Chen Xu, Wenjie Wang, Yuxin Li, Liang Pang, Jun Xu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Wildchat: 1m chatgpt interaction logs in the wild
Wenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie, Yejin Choi, and Yuntian Deng. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
PERSONA: A reproducible testbed for pluralistic alignment
Louis Castricato, Nathan Lile, Rafael Rafailov, Jan-Philipp Fränken, and Chelsea Finn. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.