Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Automated generation of scientific protocols executable by robots can significantly accelerate scientific research processes.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments
Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Five hard truths for synthetic biology
R. Kwok. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
From word embeddings to document distances
Matt Kusner, Yu Sun, Nicholas Kolkin, and Kilian Weinberger. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Protocols.io: Virtual communities for protocol development and discussion
Leonid Teytelman, Alexei Stoliartchouk, Lori Kindler, and Bonnie L. Hurwitz. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific text
Iz Beltagy, Kyle Lo, and Arman Cohan. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Biobert: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
Jinhyuk Lee, Wonjin Yoon, Sungdong Kim, Donghyeon Kim, Sunkyu Kim, Chan Ho So, and Jaewoo Kang. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Transfer learning in biomedical natural language processing: An evaluation of bert and elmo on ten benchmarking datasets
Yifan Peng, Shankai Yan, and Zhiyong Lu. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Moverscore: Text generation evaluating with contextualized embeddings and earth mover distance
Wei Zhao, Maxime Peyrard, Fei Liu, Yang Gao, Christian M. Meyer, and Steffen Eger. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chemberta: Large-scale self-supervised pretraining for molecular property prediction
Seyone Chithrananda, Gabriel Grand, and Bharath Ramsundar. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
FEQA: A question answering evaluation framework for faithfulness assessment in abstractive summarization
Esin Durmus, He He, and Mona Diab. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Domain-specific language model pretraining for biomedical natural language processing
Yu Gu, Robert Tinn, Hao Cheng, Michael Lucas, Naoto Usuyama, Xiaodong Liu, Tristan Naumann, Jianfeng Gao, and Hoifung Poon. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bleurt: Learning robust metrics for text generation
Thibault Sellam, Dipanjan Das, and Ankur P. Parikh. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Biomegatron: Larger biomedical domain language model
Hoo-Chang Shin, Yang Zhang, Evelina Bakhturina, Raul Puri, Mostofa Patwary, Mohammad Shoeybi, and Raghav Mani. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated extraction of chemical synthesis actions from experimental procedures
Alain C. Vaucher, Federico Zipoli, Jonas Geluykens, et al. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Asking and answering questions to evaluate the factual consistency of summaries
Alex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, and Mike Lewis. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert
Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Matscibert: A materials domain language model for text mining and information extraction
Selfcheckgpt: Zero-resource black-box hallucination detection for generative large language models
Potsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, and Mark J. F. Gales. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
BioPlanner: Automatic evaluation of LLMs on protocol planning in biology
Odhran O’Donoghue, Aleksandar Shtedritski, John Ginger, Ralph Abboud, Ali Ghareeb, and Samuel Rodriques. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools
Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A general-purpose material property data extraction pipeline from large polymer corpora using natural language processing
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Tanishq Gupta, Mohd Zaki, N. M. Anoop Krishnan, and Mausam. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Chemberta-2: Towards chemical foundation models
Walid Ahmad, Elana Simon, Seyone Chithrananda, Gabriel Grand, and Bharath Ramsundar. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Biogpt: generative pre-trained transformer for biomedical text generation and mining
Renqian Luo, Liai Sun, Yingce Xia, Tao Qin, Sheng Zhang, Hoifung Poon, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Chemcrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools
Andres M Bran, Sam Cox, Oliver Schilter, Carlo Baldassari, Andrew D White, and Philippe Schwaller. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gptscore: Evaluate as you desire
Jinlan Fu, See-Kiong Ng, Zhengbao Jiang, and Pengfei Liu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
What can large language models do in chemistry? a comprehensive benchmark on eight tasks
Taicheng Guo, Kehan Guo, Bozhao Nan, Zhenwen Liang, Zhichun Guo, Nitesh V. Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Llms can generate robotic scripts from goal-oriented instructions in biological laboratory automation
T Inagaki, Akari Kato, Koichi Takahashi, Haruka Ozaki, and Genki N. Kanda. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
14 examples of how llms can transform materials science and chemistry: a reflection on a large language model hackathon
Kevin Maik Jablonka, Qianxiang Ai, Alexander Al-Feghali, Shruti Badhwar, Joshua D. Bocarsly, Andres M. Bran, Stefan Bringuier, L. Catherine Brinson, Kamal Choudhary, Defne Circi, Sam Cox, Wibe A. de Jong, Matthew L. Evans, Nicolas Gastellu, Jerome Genzling, María Victoria Gil, Ankur K. Gupta, Zhi Hong, Alishba Imran, Sabine Kruschwitz, Anne Labarre, Jakub Lála, Tao Liu, Steven Ma, Sauradeep Majumdar, Garrett W. Merz, Nicolas Moitessier, Elias Moubarak, Beatriz Mouriño, Brenden Pelkie, Michael Pieler, Mayk Caldas Ramos, Bojana Ranković, Samuel G. Rodriques, Jacob N. Sanders, Philippe Schwaller, Marcus Schwarting, Jiale Shi, Berend Smit, Ben E. Smith, Joren Van Herck, Christoph Völker, Logan Ward, Sean Warren, Benjamin Weiser, Sylvester Zhang, Xiaoqi Zhang, Ghezal Ahmad Zia, Aristana Scourtas, K. J. Schmidt, Ian Foster, Andrew D. White, and Ben Blaiszik. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Shetty, A.C. Rajan, C. Kuenneth, et al. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Assessment of chemistry knowledge in large language models that generate code
Andrew D. White, Glen M. Hocky, Heta A. Gandhi, Mehrad Ansari, Sam Cox, Geemi P. Wellawatte, Subarna Sasmal, Ziyue Yang, Kangxin Liu, Yuvraj Singh, and Willmor J. Peña Ccoa. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
The claude 3 model family: Opus, sonnet, haiku
Anthropic. 2023 · 2024
Closest in time.
Evaluating generative language models in information extraction as subjective question correction
Yuchen Fan, Yantao Liu, Zijun Yao, Jifan Yu, Lei Hou, and Juanzi Li. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models
Gemini Team Google. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Protocode: Leveraging large language models (llms) for automated generation of machine-readable pcr protocols from scientific publications
Shuo Jiang, Daniel Evans-Yamamoto, Dennis Bersenev, Sucheendra K. Palaniappan, and Ayako Yachie-Kinoshita. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Yanis Labrak, Mickael Rouvier, and Richard Dufour. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Camembert-bio: Leveraging continual pre-training for cost-effective models on french biomedical data
Rian Touchent, Laurent Romary, and Eric de la Clergerie. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Is LLM a reliable reviewer? a comprehensive evaluation of LLM on automatic paper reviewing tasks
Ruiyang Zhou, Lu Chen, and Kai Yu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.