Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Pseudoentangled states are defined by their ability to hide their entanglement structure: they are indistinguishable from random states to any observer with polynomial resources, yet can have much less entanglement than random states.
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
Don N. Page, “Average entropy of a subsystem,” Physical Review Letters 71
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Alexei Kitaev and John Preskill, “Topological Entanglement Entropy,” Physical Review Letters 96
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Michael Levin and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Detecting Topological Order in a Ground State Wave Function,” Physical Review Letters 96
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and J. I. Cirac, “Criticality, the Area Law, and the Computational Power of Projected Entangled Pair States,” Physical Review Letters 96
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi, “Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Norbert Schuch, Michael M. Wolf, Frank Verstraete, and J. Ignacio Cirac, “Computational Complexity of Projected Entangled Pair States,” Physical Review Letters 98
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ryszard Horodecki and Pawe Horodecki, “Quantum entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, “Tensor Network States and Geometry,” Journal of Statistical Physics 145
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes,” Fortschritte der Physik 61
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hong Liu and S. Josephine Suh, “Entanglement Tsunami: Universal Scaling in Holographic Thermalization,” Physical Review Letters 112
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fernando Pastawski, Beni Yoshida, Daniel Harlow, and John Preskill, “Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adam M. Kaufman, M. Eric Tai, Alexander Lukin, Matthew Rispoli, Robert Schittko, Philipp M. Preiss, and Markus Greiner, “Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system,” Science 353
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Patrick Hayden, Sepehr Nezami, Xiao-Liang Qi, Nathaniel Thomas, Michael Walter, and Zhao Yang, “Holographic duality from random tensor networks,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fernando G. S. L. Brandao, Aram W. Harrow, and Michal Horodecki, “Efficient Quantum Pseudorandomness,” Physical Review Letters 116
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Leonard Susskind, “Computational complexity and black hole horizons,” Fortschritte der Physik 64
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam Nahum, Jonathan Ruhman, Sagar Vijay, and Jeongwan Haah, “Quantum Entanglement Growth under Random Unitary Dynamics,” Physical Review X 7
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Xiao-Liang Qi, Zhao Yang, and Yi-Zhuang You, “Holographic coherent states from random tensor networks,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Benoit Collins and Sho Matsumoto, “Weingarten calculus via orthogonality relations: new applications,” Latin American Journal of Probability and Mathematical Statistics 14
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Reza Haghshenas, Johnnie Gray, Andrew C. Potter, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, “Variational Power of Quantum Circuit Tensor Networks,” Physical Review X 12
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Zhengfeng Ji, Yi-Kai Liu, and Fang Song, “Pseudorandom Quantum States,” in Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO 2018 , edited by Hovav Shacham and Alexandra Boldyreva (Cham, 2018) pp. 126–152
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Dmitry A. Abanin, Ehud Altman, Immanuel Bloch, and Maksym Serbyn, “Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement,” Reviews of Modern Physics 91
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Romain Vasseur, Andrew C. Potter, Yi-Zhuang You, and Andreas W. W. Ludwig, “Entanglement transitions from holographic random tensor networks,” Physical Review B 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Tianci Zhou and Adam Nahum, “Emergent statistical mechanics of entanglement in random unitary circuits,” Phys. Rev. B 99
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Michael P. Zaletel and Frank Pollmann, “Isometric Tensor Network States in Two Dimensions,” Physical Review Letters 124
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Tomohiro Soejima, Karthik Siva, Nick Bultinck, Shubhayu Chatterjee, Frank Pollmann, and Michael P. Zaletel, “Isometric tensor network representation of string-net liquids,” Physical Review B 101
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Ignacio Cirac, David Perez-Garcia, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete, “Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems,” Reviews of Modern Physics 93
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Scott Aaronson and Jason Pollack, “Discrete Bulk Reconstruction,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Yaodong Li, Sagar Vijay, and Matthew P.A. Fisher, “Entanglement Domain Walls in Monitored Quantum Circuits and the Directed Polymer in a Random Environment,” PRX Quantum 4
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Sajant Anand, Johannes Hauschild, Yuxuan Zhang, Andrew C. Potter, and Michael P. Zaletel, “Holographic Quantum Simulation of Entanglement Renormalization Circuits,” PRX Quantum 4
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.