PeerArg: Argumentative Peer Review with LLMs

Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system

M. J. Mahoney · 1977

Earlier work this paper cites.

On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

P. M. Dung · 1995

Earlier work this paper cites.

On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks

L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, M.-C. Lagasquie-Schiex, and P. Livet · 2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

Natural Language Processing with Python

S. Bird, E. Klein, and E. Loper · 2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates

A. Rago, F. Toni, M. Aurisicchio, and P. Baroni · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

Towards artificial argumentation

K. Atkinson, P. Baroni, M. Giacomin, A. Hunter, H. Prakken, C. Reed, G. Simari, M. Thimm, and S. Villata · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Typographic layout and first impressions: testing how changes in text layout influence reader’s judgments of documents

D. J.-L. Moys · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation?

P. Baroni, A. Rago, and F. Toni · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

A dataset of peer reviews (PeerRead): Collection, insights and NLP applications

D. Kang, W. Ammar, B. Dalvi, M. van Zuylen, S. Kohlmeier, E. Hovy, and R. Schwartz · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Modular semantics and characteristics for bipolar weighted argumentation graphs

Original

T. Mossakowski and F. Neuhaus · 2018

Cited alongside, same era.

Argument mining for understanding peer reviews

X. Hua, M. Nikolov, N. Badugu, and L. Wang · 2019

Cited alongside, same era.

Metagen: An academic meta-review generation system

C. Bhatia, T. Pradhan, and S. Pal · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

Language models are few-shot learners, 2020

T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D. Amodei · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

Aspect-based sentiment analysis of scientific reviews

S. Chakraborty, P. Goyal, and A. Mukherjee · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

APCS: Towards argument based pros and cons summarization of peer reviews

S. Kumar, T. Ghosal, and A. Ekbal · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Moprd: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset

J. Lin, J. Song, Z. Zhou, Y. Chen, and X. Shi · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Attention is all you need, 2023

A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews

T. Ghosal, S. Kumar, P. K. Bharti, and A. Ekbal · 2024

Closest in time.

Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews

T. Ghosal, S. Kumar, P. K. Bharti, and A. Ekbal · 2024

Closest in time.

Can large language models perform relation-based argument mining?