Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Software development is a collaborative endeavor that requires individuals from different departments to work together in order to collectively develop a high-quality software system.
Laguage models are zero few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge-SWEBOK
Alain Abran, Pierre Bourque, Robert Dupuis, and James W Moore. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. 2020 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Workflow mining: Discovering process models from event logs
Wil Van der Aalst, Ton Weijters, and Laura Maruster. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Genetic process mining. In Applications and Theory of Petri Nets 2005: 26th International Conference, ICATPN 2005, Miami, USA, June 20-25, 2005. Proceedings 26 . Springer, 48–69
Wil MP Van der Aalst, AK Alves De Medeiros, and Anton JMM Weijters. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
An investigation into software development process formation in software start-ups
Gerry Coleman and Rory V O’Connor. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Best practices for large software development projects
Thomas Stober and Uwe Hansmann. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
BPMN Specification
Object Management Group. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Process Mining: Discovery
Wil Van der Aalst. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Alignment based precision checking. In Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2012 International Workshops, Tallinn, Estonia, September 3, 2012. Revised Papers 10 . Springer, 137–149
Arya Adriansyah, Jorge Munoz-Gama, Josep Carmona, Boudewijn F van Dongen, and Wil MP van der Aalst. 2013 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Waterfall vs. V-Model vs. Agile: A comparative study on SDLC
Sundramoorthy Balaji and M Sundararajan Murugaiyan. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A simulation model for the waterfall software development life cycle
Youssef Bassil. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework
Paul Clarke and Rory V O’connor. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Generating natural language texts from business process models. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 24th International Conference, CAiSE 2012, Gdansk, Poland, June 25-29, 2012. Proceedings 24 . Springer, 64–79
Henrik Leopold, Jan Mendling, and Artem Polyvyanyy. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lean software development: A tutorial
Mary Poppendieck and Michael A Cusumano. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Process mining: Overview and opportunities
Wil Van Der Aalst. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering block-structured process models from event logs containing infrequent behaviour. In Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2013 International Workshops, Beijing, China, August 26, 2013, Revised Papers 11 . Springer, 66–78
Sander JJ Leemans, Dirk Fahland, and Wil MP Van Der Aalst. 2014 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Comparative study on software development methodologies
Mihai Liviu Despa. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A tool to generate natural language text from business process models
Raphael Rodrigues, Leonardo Azevedo, Kate Revoredo, and Henrik Leopold. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A comparison between three SDLC models waterfall model, spiral model, and Incremental/Iterative model
Adel Alshamrani and Abdullah Bahattab. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A systematic mapping review of usability evaluation methods for software development process
Freddy Paz and José Antonio Pow-Sang. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
BPM2Text: A language independent framework for Business Process Models to Natural Language Text
Raphael De Almeida Rodrigues, Leonardo Guerreiro Azevedo, and Kate Cerqueira Revoredo. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A unified approach for measuring precision and generalization based on anti-alignments. In International conference on business process management . Springer, 39–56
Boudewijn F van Dongen, Josep Carmona, and Thomas Chatain. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Nlp4bpm: Natural language processing tools for business process management. In BPM Demo and Industrial Track 2017 Proceedings . 1–5
Luis Delicado Alcántara, Josep Sanchez-Ferreres, Josep Carmona Vargas, and Lluís Padró. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A study of software development life cycle process models. In National Conference on Reinventing Opportunities in Management, IT, and Social Sciences . 534–541
S Shylesh. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Multi-agent systems and their applications
Jing Xie and Chen-Ching Liu. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated discovery of process models from event logs: Review and benchmark
Adriano Augusto, Raffaele Conforti, Marlon Dumas, Marcello La Rosa, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Andrea Marrella, Massimo Mecella, and Allar Soo. 2018 · 2018
Hunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yura Burda, Harrison Edwards, Bowen Baker, Teddy Lee, Jan Leike, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Karl Cobbe. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Wizardcoder: Empowering code large language models with evol-instruct
Ziyang Luo, Can Xu, Pu Zhao, Qingfeng Sun, Xiubo Geng, Wenxiang Hu, Chongyang Tao, Jing Ma, Qingwei Lin, and Daxin Jiang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Experiences from using code explanations generated by large language models in a web software development e-book. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 . 931–937
Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Tran, Arto Hellas, Joanne Kim, Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Seth Bernstein, and Juho Leinonen. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Tasks. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
Nick McKenna, Tianyi Li, Liang Cheng, Mohammad Javad Hosseini, Mark Johnson, and Mark Steedman. 2023 · 2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Multi-agent systems: A survey
Ali Dorri, Salil S Kanhere, and Raja Jurdak. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Diversity in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 11th International workshop on cooperative and human aspects of software engineering . 45–48
Álvaro Menezes and Rafael Prikladnicki. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Reviving Token-based Replay: Increasing Speed While Improving Diagnostics
Alessandro Berti and Wil MP van der Aalst. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Extraction of system states from natural language requirements. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) . IEEE, 211–222
Florian Pudlitz, Florian Brokhausen, and Andreas Vogelsang. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Comparative analysis of software development life cycle models (SDLC). In Intelligent Algorithms in Software Engineering: Proceedings of the 9th Computer Science On-line Conference 2020, Volume 1 9 . Springer, 310–322
Jide ET Akinsola, Afolakemi S Ogunbanwo, Olatunji J Okesola, Isaac J Odun-Ayo, Florence D Ayegbusi, and Ayodele A Adebiyi. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Prompt programming for large language models: Beyond the few-shot paradigm. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–7
Laria Reynolds and Kyle McDonell. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A literature review of using machine learning in software development life cycle stages
Saad Shafiq, Atif Mashkoor, Christoph Mayr-Dorn, and Alexander Egyed. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
CHATREPORT: Democratizing Sustainability Disclosure Analysis through LLM-based Tools
Jingwei Ni, Julia Bingler, Chiara Colesanti-Senni, Mathias Kraus, Glen Gostlow, Tobias Schimanski, Dominik Stammbach, Saeid Ashraf Vaghefi, Qian Wang, Nicolas Webersinke, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology . 1–22
Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Communicative agents for software development
Chen Qian, Xin Cong, Cheng Yang, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Juyuan Xu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2023a · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Experiential co-learning of software-developing agents
Chen Qian, Yufan Dang, Jiahao Li, Wei Liu, Weize Chen, Cheng Yang, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2023b · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Large Laguage models are zero effective text rankers with pairwise ranking prompting
Zhen Qin, Rolf Jagerman, Kai Hui, Honglei Zhuang, Junru Wu, Jiaming Shen, Tianqi Liu, Jialu Liu, Donald Metzler, Xuanhui Wang, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Code llama: Open foundation models for code
Baptiste Roziere, Jonas Gehring, Fabian Gloeckle, Sten Sootla, Itai Gat, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Yossi Adi, Jingyu Liu, Tal Remez, Jérémy Rapin, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
LLM-Assist: Enhancing Closed-Loop Planning with Language-Based Reasoning
S P Sharan, Francesco Pittaluga, Vijay Kumar B G, and Manmohan Chandraker. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Llm-planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision . 2998–3009
Chan Hee Song, Jiaman Wu, Clayton Washington, Brian M Sadler, Wei-Lun Chao, and Yu Su. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models
Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models
Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt
Jules White, Quchen Fu, Sam Hays, Michael Sandborn, Carlos Olea, Henry Gilbert, Ashraf Elnashar, Jesse Spencer-Smith, and Douglas C Schmidt. 2023a · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Jules White, Sam Hays, Quchen Fu, Jesse Spencer-Smith, and Douglas C Schmidt. 2023b · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A survey of large language models
Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Hot or Cold? Adaptive Temperature Sampling for Code Generation with Large Language Models
Yuqi Zhu, Jia Li, Ge Li, YunFei Zhao, Jia Li, Zhi Jin, and Hong Mei. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A survey on evaluation of large language models
Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Linyi Yang, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, et al · 2024
Closest in time.
Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools
Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents
Zeyu Zhang, Xiaohe Bo, Chen Ma, Rui Li, Xu Chen, Quanyu Dai, Jieming Zhu, Zhenhua Dong, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.