Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Characterization of search selection effects comprises a core element of gravitational-wave data analysis.
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. F. Schutz and M. Tinto, Antenna patterns of interferometric detectors of gravitational waves - I. Linearly polarized waves., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 224
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Niederreiter, Low-discrepancy and low-dispersion sequences, Journal of Number Theory 30
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. S. Finn and D. F. Chernoff, Observing binary inspiral in gravitational radiation: One interferometer, Physical Review D 47
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. E. Kidder, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wiseman, Spin effects in the inspiral of coalescing compact binaries, Physical Review D 47
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform?, Physical Review D 49
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, Measuring gravitational waves from binary black hole coalescences. I. Signal to noise for inspiral, merger, and ringdown, Physical Review D 57
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Allen, χ 2 \chi^{2} time-frequency discriminator for gravitational wave detection, Physical Review D 71
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Vitale, D. Gerosa, W. M. Farr, and S. R. Taylor, Inferring the properties of a population of compact binaries in presence of selection effects, in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy (Springer Singapore, 2020) arXiv: 2007.05579
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment, Computing In Science & Engineering 9
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Racine, Analysis of spin precession in binary black hole systems including quadrupole-monopole interaction, Physical Review D 78
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Buonanno, B. R. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors, Physical Review D 80
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Van Rossum and F. L. Drake, Python 3 Reference Manual (CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA, 2009)
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Santamaría, F. Ohme, P. Ajith, B. Brügmann, N. Dorband, et al. , Matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms: Systematic errors and a new phenomenological model for nonprecessing black hole binaries, Physical Review D 82
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wes McKinney, Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference , edited by Stéfan van der Walt and Jarrod Millman (2010) pp. 56 – 61
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Ajith, M. Hannam, S. Husa, Y. Chen, B. Brügmann, et al. , Inspiral-Merger-Ringdown Waveforms for Black-Hole Binaries with Nonprecessing Spins, Physical Review Letters 106
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Behnel, R. Bradshaw, C. Citro, L. Dalcin, D. S. Seljebotn, and K. Smith, Cython: The best of both worlds, Computing in Science Engineering 13
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, et al. , Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, Journal of Machine Learning Research 12
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Collette, Python and HDF5 (O’Reilly, 2013)
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Buitinck, G. Louppe, M. Blondel, F. Pedregosa, A. Mueller, et al. , API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project, in ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning (2013) pp. 108–122
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Dal Canton, A. H. Nitz, A. P. Lundgren, A. B. Nielsen, D. A. Brown, et al. , Implementing a search for aligned-spin neutron star-black hole systems with advanced ground based gravitational wave detectors, Physical Review D 90
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. D. Hoffman and A. Gelman, The No-U-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Journal of Machine Learning Research 15
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Aasi, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical and Quantum Gravity 32
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Acernese, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, D. Aisa, N. Allemandou, et al. (The Virgo Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical and Quantum Gravity 32
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Dominik, E. Berti, R. O’Shaughnessy, I. Mandel, K. Belczynski, et al. , DOUBLE COMPACT OBJECTS. III. GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE DETECTION RATES, The Astrophysical Journal 806
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
W. M. Farr, J. R. Gair, I. Mandel, and C. Cutler, Counting and confusion: Bayesian rate estimation with multiple populations, Physical Review D 91
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Schmidt, F. Ohme, and M. Hannam, Towards models of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries: II. Modelling precession effects with a single effective precession parameter, Physical Review D 91
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Adams, D. Buskulic, V. Germain, G. M. Guidi, F. Marion, et al. , Low-latency analysis pipeline for compact binary coalescences in the advanced gravitational wave detector era, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — O1+O2+O3 Search Sensitivity Estimates, 10.5281/zenodo.5636816 (2021)
2021
Later among the works it cites.
D. Gerosa, M. Mould, D. Gangardt, P. Schmidt, G. Pratten, and L. M. Thomas, A generalized precession parameter χ p \chi_{\mathrm{p}} to interpret gravitational-wave data, Physical Review D 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
K. W. Wong, K. Breivik, K. Kremer, and T. Callister, Joint constraints on the field-cluster mixing fraction, common envelope efficiency, and globular cluster radii from a population of binary hole mergers via deep learning, Physical Review D 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
S. Klimenko, G. Vedovato, M. Drago, F. Salemi, V. Tiwari, et al. , Method for detection and reconstruction of gravitational wave transients with networks of advanced detectors, Physical Review D 93
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
S. A. Usman, A. H. Nitz, I. W. Harry, C. M. Biwer, D. A. Brown, et al. , The PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, et al. , THE RATE OF BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGERS INFERRED FROM ADVANCED LIGO OBSERVATIONS SURROUNDING GW150914, The Astrophysical Journal 833
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Messick, K. Blackburn, P. Brady, P. Brockill, K. Cannon, et al. , Analysis framework for the prompt discovery of compact binary mergers in gravitational-wave data, Physical Review D 95
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Biwer, D. Barker, J. Batch, J. Betzwieser, R. Fisher, et al. , Validating gravitational-wave detections: The Advanced LIGO hardware injection system, Physical Review D 95
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Tiwari, Estimation of the sensitive volume for gravitational-wave source populations using weighted Monte Carlo integration, Classical and Quantum Gravity 35
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Fishbach, D. E. Holz, and W. M. Farr, Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift?, The Astrophysical Journal 863
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Talbot and E. Thrane, Measuring the Binary Black Hole Mass Spectrum with an Astrophysically Motivated Parameterization, The Astrophysical Journal 856
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. S. Bavera, M. Fishbach, M. Zevin, E. Zapartas, and T. Fragos, The χ eff \chi_{\mathrm{eff}} - z z correlation of field binary black hole mergers and how 3G gravitational-wave detectors can constrain it, Astronomy & Astrophysics 665
2022
Later among the works it cites.
F. S. Broekgaarden, E. Berger, S. Stevenson, S. Justham, I. Mandel, et al. , Impact of massive binary star and cosmic evolution on gravitational wave observations – II. Double compact object rates and properties, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 516
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
T. A. Callister, S. J. Miller, K. Chatziioannou, and W. M. Farr, No Evidence that the Majority of Black Holes in Binaries Have Zero Spin, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 937
2022
Later among the works it cites.
C. Talbot and E. Thrane, Flexible and Accurate Evaluation of Gravitational-wave Malmquist Bias with Machine Learning, The Astrophysical Journal 927
2022
Later among the works it cites.
M. Mould, D. Gerosa, and S. R. Taylor, Deep learning and Bayesian inference of gravitational-wave populations: Hierarchical black-hole mergers, Physical Review D 106
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run - Parameter Estimation Data Release, 10.5281/zenodo.6513631 (2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
G. Fragione and F. A. Rasio, Demographics of Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Dense Star Clusters, The Astrophysical Journal 951
2023
Later among the works it cites.
R. Essick, Semianalytic sensitivity estimates for catalogs of gravitational-wave transients, Physical Review D 108
2023
Later among the works it cites.
C. Talbot and J. Golomb, Growing pains: understanding the impact of likelihood uncertainty on hierarchical Bayesian inference for gravitational-wave astronomy, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 526
2023
Later among the works it cites.
R. Abbott, H. Abe, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, S. Adhicary, et al. , Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 267
2023
Later among the works it cites.
C. E. A. Chapman-Bird, C. P. L. Berry, and G. Woan, Rapid determination of LISA
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Collette, T. Kluyver, T. A. Caswell, J. Tocknell, J. Kieffer, et al. , h5py/h5py: 3.8.0 (2023)
2023
Later among the works it cites.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — Parameter estimation data release, 10.5281/zenodo.8177023 (2023)
2023
Later among the works it cites.
R. Abbott, T. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, and C. a. Adams, GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Physical Review D 109
2024
Closest in time.
D. Gerosa and M. Bellotti, Quick recipes for gravitational-wave selection effects, Classical and Quantum Gravity 41
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
The pandas development team, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas (2024)
2024
Closest in time.
O. Grisel, A. Mueller, Lars, A. Gramfort, G. Louppe, et al. , scikit-learn/scikit-learn: Scikit-learn 1.5.0 (2024)
2024
Closest in time.
R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, M. Haberland, E. Burovski, W. Weckesser, et al. , scipy/scipy: Scipy 1.13.1 (2024)
2024
Closest in time.
T. Developers, Tensorflow (2024)
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
T. Wagg, F. Broekgaarden, and K. Gültekin, Tomwagg/software-citation-station: v1.2 (2024)
2024
Closest in time.