Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique commonly used to equip models with out of distribution knowledge.
S. E. Robertson and S. Walker, “Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval,” in Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , 1994. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2218552
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Song, A. M. Rush, and V. Shmatikov, “Adversarial semantic collisions,” in Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2020. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:224461948
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Liu, Y. Kang, D. Tang, K. Song, C. Sun, X. Wang, W. Lu, and X. Liu, “Order-disorder: Imitation adversarial attacks for black-box neural ranking models,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. T. Mallen, A. Asai, V. Zhong, R. Das, H. Hajishirzi, and D. Khashabi, “When not to trust language models: Investigating effectiveness of parametric and non-parametric memories,” in Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2022. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:254877603
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Wang, L. Lyu, and A. Anand, “Bert rankers are brittle: A study using adversarial document perturbations,” Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval , 2022. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:249953753
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Song, J. Zhang, J. Zhu, M. Tang, and Y. Yang, “Trattack”:” text rewriting attack against text retrieval,” in Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP , 2022. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248780479
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Kandpal, H. Deng, A. Roberts, E. Wallace, and C. Raffel, “Large language models struggle to learn long-tail knowledge,” in International Conference on Machine Learning , 2022. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:253522998
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Greshake, S. Abdelnabi, S. Mishra, C. Endres, T. Holz, and M. Fritz, “Not what you’ve signed up for: Compromising real-world llm-integrated applications with indirect prompt injection,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security , 2023, pp. 79–90
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Chen, B. He, Z. Ye, L. Sun, and Y. Sun, “Towards imperceptible document manipulations against neural ranking models,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) , 2023
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Wu, R. Zhang, J. Guo, M. De Rijke, Y. Fan, and X. Cheng, “Prada: Practical black-box adversarial attacks against neural ranking models,” vol. 41, no. 4, 2023
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Chen, B. He, Z. Ye, L. Sun, and Y. Sun, “Towards imperceptible document manipulations against neural ranking models,” in Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258461344
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Liu, R. Zhang, J. Guo, M. de Rijke, W. Chen, Y. Fan, and X. Cheng, “Topic-oriented adversarial attacks against black-box neural ranking models,” Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258418289
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
——, “Black-box adversarial attacks against dense retrieval models: A multi-view contrastive learning method,” Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:261049237
OWASP, “Owasp top 10 for llms and generative ai apps,” https://genai.owasp.org/llm-top-10/ , [Accessed 19-05-2024]
2024
Closest in time.
X. Shen, Y. Qu, M. Backes, and Y. Zhang, “Prompt stealing attacks against text-to-image generation models,” 2024
2024
Closest in time.
J. Evertz, M. Chlosta, L. Schönherr, and T. Eisenhofer, “Whispers in the machine: Confidentiality in llm-integrated systems,” in ArXiv , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
“Introduction — LangChain — python.langchain.com,” https://python.langchain.com/docs/get_started/introduction/ , [Accessed 24-04-2024]
2024
Closest in time.
“LlamaIndex - LlamaIndex — docs.llamaindex.ai,” https://docs.llamaindex.ai/en/stable/ , [Accessed 24-04-2024]
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
N. F. Liu, K. Lin, J. Hewitt, A. Paranjape, M. Bevilacqua, F. Petroni, and P. Liang, “Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , vol. 12, pp. 157–173, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:259360665
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Crothers, N. Japkowicz, and H. L. Viktor, “Machine-generated text: A comprehensive survey of threat models and detection methods,” IEEE Access , 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Bagdasaryan, T.-Y. Hsieh, B. Nassi, and V. Shmatikov, “Abusing images and sounds for indirect instruction injection in multi-modal llms,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Liu, Y. Jia, R. Geng, J. Jia, and N. Z. Gong, “Prompt injection attacks and defenses in llm-integrated applications,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Chen, E. Mendes, S. Das, W. Xu, and A. Ritter, “Can language models be instructed to protect personal information?” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“Haystack Introduction — docs.haystack.deepset.ai,” https://docs.haystack.deepset.ai/docs/intro , [Accessed 24-04-2024]
2024
Closest in time.
“Chroma,” https://www.trychroma.com/ , (Accessed on 06/06/2024)
2024
Closest in time.
“pgvector/pgvector: Open-source vector similarity search for postgres,” https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector , (Accessed on 06/06/2024)
2024
Closest in time.
“The vector database to build knowledgeable ai — pinecone,” https://www.pinecone.io/ , (Accessed on 06/06/2024)
2024
Closest in time.
“Default qa chains and prompts,” https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/tree/1ea6d83188da1e9bb5baed57ac9e0fc969b77905/libs/langchain/langchain/chains/question_answering , 2023, [Accessed 24-04-2024]
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
“Ragas,” https://docs.ragas.io , (Accessed on 04/25/2024)
2024
Closest in time.
Y. Liu, G. Deng, Z. Xu, Y. Li, Y. Zheng, Y. Zhang, L. Zhao, T. Zhang, K. Wang, and Y. Liu, “Jailbreaking chatgpt via prompt engineering: An empirical study,” 2024
2024
Closest in time.
S. Abdelnabi, N. Carlini, E. Debenedetti, M. Fritz, K. Greshake, R. Hadzic, T. Holz, D. P. Daphne Ippolito, J. Rando, L. Schönherr, F. Tramèr, and Y. Zhang. (2024) Large language model capture-the-flag (llm ctf) competition @ satml 2024. Spylab. [Online]. Available: https://ctf.spylab.ai
2024
Closest in time.