Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The Fermionic linear optical (FLO) extent is a quantity that serves two roles, firstly it serves as a measure of the "quantumness" (or non-classicality) of quantum circuits.
P. Jordan and E. Wigner, Über das paulische äquivalenzverbot, Zeitschrift für Physik 47
1928
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. G. Valiant, Quantum computers that can be simulated classically in polynomial time, in Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , STOC ’01 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2001) p. 114–123
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. M. Terhal and D. P. DiVincenzo, Classical simulation of noninteracting-fermion quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. A 65
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Jozsa and N. Linden, On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Botero and B. Reznik, Bcs-like modewise entanglement of fermion gaussian states, Phys. Lett. A 331
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bravyi, Universal quantum computation with the ν = 5 / 2 \nu=5/2 fractional quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. A 73
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Jozsa, B. Kraus, A. Miyake, and J. Watrous, Matchgate and space-bounded quantum computations are equivalent, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 466
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Oszmaniec, J. Gutt, and M. Kuś, Classical simulation of fermionic linear optics augmented with noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A 90
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. J. Brod, Efficient classical simulation of matchgate circuits with generalized inputs and measurements, Phys. Rev. A 93
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bravyi and D. Gosset, Improved classical simulation of quantum circuits dominated by Clifford gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Oszmaniec and Z. Zimborás, Universal extensions of restricted classes of quantum operations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Regula, Convex geometry of quantum resource quantification, J. Phys. A 51
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
I. D. Kivlichan, J. McClean, N. Wiebe, C. Gidney, A. Aspuru-Guzik, G. K.-L. Chan, and R. Babbush, Quantum simulation of electronic structure with linear depth and connectivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Jiang, K. J. Sung, K. Kechedzhi, V. N. Smelyanskiy, and S. Boixo, Quantum algorithms to simulate many-body physics of correlated fermions, Phys. Rev. Appl. 9
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Bravyi, D. Browne, P. Calpin, E. Campbell, D. Gosset, and M. Howard, Simulation of quantum circuits by low-rank stabilizer decompositions, Quantum 3
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
P.-L. Dallaire-Demers, J. Romero, L. Veis, S. Sim, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Low-depth circuit ansatz for preparing correlated fermionic states on a quantum computer, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4
W. J. Huggins, B. A. O’Gorman, N. C. Rubin, D. R. Reichman, R. Babbush, and J. Lee, Unbiasing fermionic quantum Monte Carlo with a quantum computer, Nature 603
2022
Later among the works it cites.
K. Wan, W. J. Huggins, J. Lee, and R. Babbush, Matchgate shadows for fermionic quantum simulation, Communications in Mathematical Physics 404
2023
Later among the works it cites.
E. K. Dax and B. Wu, Error-mitigated fermionic classical shadows on noisy quantum devices., npj Quantum Inf 10
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Hebenstreit, R. Jozsa, B. Kraus, S. Strelchuk, and M. Yoganathan, All pure fermionic non-Gaussian states are magic states for matchgate computations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Google AI Quantum and Collaborators, Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer, Science 369
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Heimendahl, F. Montealegre-Mora, F. Vallentin, and D. Gross, Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative, Quantum 5
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Pashayan, O. Reardon-Smith, K. Korzekwa, and S. D. Bartlett, Fast estimation of outcome probabilities for quantum circuits, PRX Quantum 3
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Oszmaniec, N. Dangniam, M. E. Morales, and Z. Zimborás, Fermion sampling: A robust quantum computational advantage scheme using fermionic linear optics and magic input states, PRX Quantum 3
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Stanisic, J. L. Bosse, F. M. Gambetta, R. A. Santos, W. Mruczkiewicz, T. E. O’Brien, E. Ostby, and A. Montanaro, Observing ground-state properties of the Fermi-Hubbard model using a scalable algorithm on a quantum computer, Nat. Commun. 13
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
More specifically non-stabilizerness
Cited in the paper.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
B. Dias and R. Koenig, Classical simulation of non-gaussian fermionic circuits, Quantum 8
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.