Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Watermarking is a key technique for detecting AI-generated text.
E. J. Gumbel, “Statistical theory of extreme valuse and some practical applications,” Nat. Bur. Standards Appl. Math. Ser. 33 , 1954
1954
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Gabrilovich and A. Gontmakher, “The homograph attack,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 45, no. 2, p. 128, 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Boucher, I. Shumailov, R. Anderson, and N. Papernot, “Bad characters: Imperceptible nlp attacks,” in 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 1987–2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. N. Helfrich and R. Neff, “Dual canonicalization: An answer to the homograph attack,” in 2012 eCrime Researchers Summit . IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–10
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Fan, M. Lewis, and Y. Dauphin, “Hierarchical neural story generation,” in Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2018, pp. 889–898
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Holtzman, J. Buys, M. Forbes, A. Bosselut, D. Golub, and Y. Choi, “Learning to write with cooperative discriminators,” in Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2018, pp. 1638–1649
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Holtzman, J. Buys, L. Du, M. Forbes, and Y. Choi, “The curious case of neural text degeneration,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
OECD, “Oecd ai principles,” Available at: https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/ai-principles/ , 2019, guidelines for ethical, trustworthy AI. Transparency and accountability are key principles
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, K. Lee, S. Narang, M. Matena, Y. Zhou, W. Li, and P. J. Liu, “Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,” Journal of machine learning research , vol. 21, no. 140, pp. 1–67, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, D. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, L. Ouyang, and D. Amodei, “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2020, seminal paper introducing GPT-3, discussing the importance of probabilities in understanding model behavior
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Pajola and M. Conti, “Fall of giants: How popular text-based mlaas fall against a simple evasion attack,” in 2021 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 198–211
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
European Commission, “The EU Artificial Intelligence Act,” Available at: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/ , 2021, proposed regulation focusing on transparency and accountability in high-risk AI systems
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Wieting, K. Gimpel, G. Neubig, and T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, “Paraphrastic representations at scale,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations , 2022, pp. 379–388
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Aaronson, “Simons institute talk on watermarking of large language models,” https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks/scott-aaronson-ut-austin-openai-2023-08-17 , 2023
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Kirchenbauer, J. Geiping, Y. Wen, J. Katz, I. Miers, and T. Goldstein, “A watermark for large language models,” in Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning , ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, A. Krause, E. Brunskill, K. Cho, B. Engelhardt, S. Sabato, and J. Scarlett, Eds., vol. 202. PMLR, 23–29 Jul 2023, pp. 17 061–17 084. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/kirchenbauer23a.html
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Dathathri, A. See, S. Ghaisas, P.-S. Huang, R. McAdam, J. Welbl, V. Bachani, A. Kaskasoli, R. Stanforth, T. Matejovicova et al. , “Scalable watermarking for identifying large language model outputs,” Nature , vol. 634, no. 8035, pp. 818–823, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
M. Christ and S. Gunn, “Pseudorandom error-correcting codes,” in Annual International Cryptology Conference . Springer, 2024, pp. 325–347
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Liu, L. Pan, X. Hu, S. Li, L. Wen, I. King, and S. Y. Philip, “An unforgeable publicly verifiable watermark for large language models,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Fairoze, S. Garg, S. Jha, S. Mahloujifar, M. Mahmoody, and M. Wang, “Publicly detectable watermarking for language models,” Cryptology ePrint Archive , 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Goodside, “There are adversarial attacks for that proposal as well — in particular, generating with emojis after words and then removing them before submitting defeats it,” Twitter, Jan. 2023, uRL: https://twitter.com/goodside/status/1610682909647671306
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
R. OpenAI, “Gpt-4 technical report. arxiv 2303.08774,” View in Article , vol. 2, no. 5, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Ghentiyala and V. Guruswami, “New constructions of pseudorandom codes,” Cryptology ePrint Archive , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
H. Zhang, B. L. Edelman, D. Francati, D. Venturi, G. Ateniese, and B. Barak, “Watermarks in the sand: Impossibility of strong watermarking for language models,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Z. He, B. Zhou, H. Hao, A. Liu, X. Wang, Z. Tu, Z. Zhang, and R. Wang, “Can watermarks survive translation? on the cross-lingual consistency of text watermark for large language models,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , L.-W. Ku, A. Martins, and V. Srikumar, Eds. Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguistics, Aug. 2024, pp. 4115–4129. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.226
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
A. Liu, L. Pan, X. Hu, S. Meng, and L. Wen, “A semantic invariant robust watermark for large language models,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=6p8lpe4MNf
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
A. Cohen, A. Hoover, and G. Schoenbach, “Watermarking language models for many adaptive users,” in 2025 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) . IEEE Computer Society, 2024, pp. 84–84
2024
Closest in time.