Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The increasing development of LLMs in code generation has drawn significant attention among researchers.
Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020, 33: 1877–1901
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Broder A Z. On the resemblance and containment of documents. 1997. 21–29
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fix G. The design of an automated unit test code generation system. 2009. 743–747
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Radford A, Narasimhan K, Salimans T, et al. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Zhang Y, Chen Y, Cheung S C, et al. An empirical study on tensorflow program bugs. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on software testing and analysis, 2018. 129–140
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Radford A, Wu J, Child R, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 2019, 1: 9
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Islam M J, Nguyen G, Pan R, et al. A comprehensive study on deep learning bug characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 2019. 510–520
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Svyatkovskiy A, Deng S K, Fu S, et al. Intellicode compose: Code generation using transformer. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 2020. 1433–1443
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Garcia J, Feng Y, Shen J, et al. A comprehensive study of autonomous vehicle bugs. 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shin J, Nam J. A survey of automatic code generation from natural language. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 2021, 17: 537–555
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hendrycks D, Basart S, Kadavath S, et al. Measuring coding challenge competence with APPS. In: J Vanschoren, S Yeung, eds., Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks 1, NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks 2021, December 2021, virtual, 2021. URL https://datasets-benchmarks-proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/c24cd76e1ce41366a4bbe8a49b02a028-Abstract-round2.html
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Le H, Wang Y, Gotmare A D, et al. Coderl: Mastering code generation through pretrained models and deep reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022, 35: 21314–21328
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dehaerne E, Dey B, Halder S, et al. Code generation using machine learning: A systematic review. Ieee Access, 2022, 10: 82434–82455
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wei J, Wang X, Schuurmans D, et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2022, 35: 24824–24837
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dong Q, Li L, Dai D, et al. A survey on in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00234, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wang G, Wang Z, Chen J, et al. An empirical study on numerical bugs in deep learning programs. In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2022. 1–5
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Xia C S, Zhang L. Less training, more repairing please: revisiting automated program repair via zero-shot learning. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 2022. 959–971
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Yu Z, Tao Y, Chen L, et al. Beta-coder: On value-based deep reinforcement learning for program synthesis. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Wang S, Lin B, Sun Z, et al. Two birds with one stone: Boosting code generation and code search via a generative adversarial network. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2023, 7: 486–515
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Tashtoush Y, Abu-El-Rub N, Darwish O, et al. A notional understanding of the relationship between code readability and software complexity. Information, 2023, 14: 81
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Bairi R, Sonwane A, Kanade A, et al. Codeplan: Repository-level coding using llms and planning. In: NeurIPS 2023 Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Roberts M, Thakur H, Herlihy C, et al. To the cutoff… and beyond? a longitudinal perspective on llm data contamination. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gpt-4 technical report. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
gpt-3.5-turbo. https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3-5, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Tan X, Shi S, Qiu X, et al. Self-criticism: Aligning large language models with their understanding of helpfulness, honesty, and harmlessness. 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Contributors O. Opencompass: A universal evaluation platform for foundation models. https://github.com/open-compass/opencompass, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Codewars. https://docs.codewars.com/concepts/kata/, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Jimenez C E, Yang J, Wettig A, et al. Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Closest in time.
Guo D, Zhu Q, Yang D, et al. Deepseek-coder: When the large language model meets programming – the rise of code intelligence. 2024. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267211867
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Song D, Guo H, Zhou Y, et al. Code needs comments: Enhancing code llms with comment augmentation. CoRR, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Wei Y, Wang Z, Liu J, et al. Magicoder: Empowering code generation with oss-instruct. In: Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Anthropic A. The claude 3 model family: Opus, sonnet, haiku. Claude-3 Model Card, 2024, 1
2024
Closest in time.
Liu A, Feng B, Xue B, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
Llama-3. https://ai.meta.com/blog/meta-llama-3, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Liu J, Xia C S, Wang Y, et al. Is your code generated by chatgpt really correct? rigorous evaluation of large language models for code generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024, 36
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Wang H, Liu Z, Wang S, et al. Intervenor: Prompting the coding ability of large language models with the interactive chain of repair. 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Pan R, Ibrahimzada A R, Krishna R, et al. Lost in translation: A study of bugs introduced by large language models while translating code. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2024. 1–13
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Yu H, Shen B, Ran D, et al. Codereval: A benchmark of pragmatic code generation with generative pre-trained models. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering, 2024. 1–12
2024
Closest in time.