Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We present a comprehensive AI risk taxonomy derived from eight government policies from the European Union, United States, and China and 16 company policies worldwide, making a significant step towards establishing a unified language for generative AI safety evaluation.
The qualitative content analysis process
Satu Elo and Helvi Kyngäs · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
The law of recitals in european community legislation
Tadas Klimas and Jurate Vaiciukaite · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures
Philipp Mayring · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council
European Parliament and Council of the European Union · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the use and misuse of recitals in european union law
Maarten den Heijer, Teun van Os van den Abeelen, and Antanina Maslyka · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Realtoxicityprompts: Evaluating neural toxic degeneration in language models
Samuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi, and Noah A Smith · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ai ethics maturity model
Kathy Baxter · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Provisions on the management of algorithmic recommendations in internet information services
Cyberspace Administration of China · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ai maturity framework for enterprise applications
IBM · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ethical and social risks of harm from language models
Laura Weidinger, John Mellor, Maribeth Rauh, Conor Griffin, Jonathan Uesato, Po-Sen Huang, Myra Cheng, Mia Glaese, Borja Balle, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Behavioral use licensing for responsible ai
Danish Contractor, Daniel McDuff, Julia Katherine Haines, Jenny Lee, Christopher Hines, Brent Hecht, Nicholas Vincent, and Hanlin Li · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Provisions on the administration of deep synthesis internet information services
Cyberspace Administration of China · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artificial intelligence with american values and chinese characteristics: a comparative analysis of american and chinese governmental ai policies
Emmie Hine and Luciano Floridi · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ai services terms of use
Microsoft · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Microsoft responsible ai standard, v2
Microsoft · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introducing ChatGPT
OpenAI · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Governing artificial intelligence in china and the european union: Comparing aims and promoting ethical outcomes
Huw Roberts, Josh Cowls, Emmie Hine, Jessica Morley, Vincent Wang, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Yi series models community license agreement
01.AI · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tongyi qianwen license agreement
Alibaba · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Aws responsible ai policy
Amazon · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Anthropic acceptable use policy
Anthropic · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Anthropic’s responsible scaling policy
Anthropic · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introducing Claude
Anthropic · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Baidu ernie user agreement
Baidu · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence
Joseph Biden · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards compromise: A concrete two-tier proposal for foundation models in the eu ai act
Rishi Bommasani, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Daniel E. Ho, Marietje Schaake, and Percy Liang · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Do foundation model providers comply with the eu ai act?
Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyman, Daniel Zhang, and Percy Liang · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology
Anu Bradford · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interim measures for the management of generative artificial intelligence services
Cyberspace Administration of China · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deepseek license agreement
DeepSeek · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Deepseek user agreement
DeepSeek · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Recent trends in china’s large language model landscape
Jeffrey Ding, Jenny W. Xiao, April, Markus Anderljung, Ben Cottier, Samuel Curtis, Ben Garfinkel, Lennart Heim, Toby Shevlane, and Baobao Zhang · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Ai licensing can’t balance “open” with “responsible”, 2023
Kate Downing · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models
Gemini Team · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
The enterprise guide to ai safety
Seraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant and Maximilian Mozes · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Cohere’s usage guidelines
Cohere · 2024
Closest in time.
Basic security requirements for generative artificial intelligence service
Cyberspace Administration of China · 2024
Closest in time.
Deepseek open platform terms of service
DeepSeek · 2024
Closest in time.
Balancing standards: U.s. and chinese strategies for developing technical standards in ai
Jeffrey Ding · 2024
Closest in time.
An eu ai act that works for people and society
Connor Dunlop · 2024
Closest in time.
The eu artificial intelligence act, 2024
European Commission · 2024
Closest in time.
Civil society reacts to ep ai act draft
Fair Trials · 2024
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Google generative ai prohibited use policy
Google · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Ai regulation in europe: From the ai act to future regulatory challenges, 2023
Philipp Hacker · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Regulating chatgpt and other large generative ai models, 2023
Philipp Hacker, Andreas Engel, and Marco Mauer · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Adding structure to ai harm: An introduction to cset’s ai harm framework
Mia Hoffmann and Heather Frase · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Artificial intelligence index report 2023, 2023
Nestor Maslej, Loredana Fattorini, Erik Brynjolfsson, John Etchemendy, Katrina Ligett, Terah Lyons, James Manyika, Helen Ngo, Juan Carlos Niebles, Vanessa Parli, Yoav Shoham, Russell Wald, Jack Clark, and Raymond Perrault · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
By the numbers: Tracking the ai executive order
Caroline Meinhardt, Christie M. Lawrence, Lindsey A. Gailmard, Daniel Zhang, Rishi Bommasani, Rohini Kosoglu, Peter Henderson, Russell Wald, and Daniel E. Ho · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
Google gemma prohibited use policy
Google · 2024
Closest in time.
On the societal impact of open foundation models, 2024
Sayash Kapoor, Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyman, Shayne Longpre, Ashwin Ramaswami, Peter Cihon, Aspen Hopkins, Kevin Bankston, Stella Biderman, Miranda Bogen, Rumman Chowdhury, Alex Engler, Peter Henderson, Yacine Jernite, Seth Lazar, Stefano Maffulli, Alondra Nelson, Joelle Pineau, Aviya Skowron, Dawn Song, Victor Storchan, Daniel Zhang, Daniel E. Ho, Percy Liang, and Arvind Narayanan · 2024
Closest in time.
Acceptable use policies for foundation models: Considerations for policymakers and developers
Kevin Klyman · 2024
Closest in time.
Salad-bench: A hierarchical and comprehensive safety benchmark for large language models
Lijun Li, Bowen Dong, Ruohui Wang, Xuhao Hu, Wangmeng Zuo, Dahua Lin, Yu Qiao, and Jing Shao · 2024
Closest in time.
The us and its allies should engage with china on ai law and policy
Mark MacCarthy · 2024
Closest in time.
Harmbench: A standardized evaluation framework for automated red teaming and robust refusal
Mantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, Norman Mu, Elham Sakhaee, Nathaniel Li, Steven Basart, Bo Li, et al · 2024
Closest in time.
Transparency of ai eo implementation: An assessment 90 days in
Caroline Meinhardt, Kevin Klyman, Hamzah Daud, Christie M. Lawrence, Rohini Kosoglu, Daniel Zhang, and Daniel E. Ho · 2024
Closest in time.
Meta ais terms of service
Meta · 2024
Closest in time.
Mistral’s legal terms and conditions
Mistral · 2024
Closest in time.
Heavy is the head that wears the crown: A risk-based tiered approach to governing general-purpose ai
Nicolas Moës and Frank Ryan · 2024
Closest in time.
Basic safety requirements for generative artificial intelligence services, April 2024
National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity of Standardization Administration of China (SAC/TC260) · 2024
Closest in time.
Openai model spec
OpenAI · 2024
Closest in time.
Openai usage policies
OpenAI · 2024
Closest in time.
The enterprise guide to ai safety
OWASP · 2024
Closest in time.
Fine-tuning aligned language models compromises safety, even when users do not intend to!
Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen, Ruoxi Jia, Prateek Mittal, and Peter Henderson · 2024
Closest in time.
China’s ai regulations and how they get made
Matt Sheehan · 2024
Closest in time.
Tracing the roots of china’s ai regulations
Matt Sheehan · 2024
Closest in time.
Stability’s acceptable use policy
Stability · 2024
Closest in time.
California generative artificial intelligence risk assessment
State of California Department of Technology · 2024
Closest in time.
How will china’s generative ai regulations shape the future? a digichina forum
Helen Toner, Zac Haluza, Yan Luo, Xuezi Dan, Matt Sheehan, Seaton Huang, Kimball Chen, Rogier Creemers, Paul Triolo, and Caroline Meinhardt · 2024
Closest in time.
Forum: Analyzing an expert proposal for china’s artificial intelligence law
Graham Webster, Jason Zhou, Mingli Shi, Hunter Dorwart, Johanna Costigan, and Qiheng Chen · 2024
Closest in time.
The promise and perils of china’s regulation of artificial intelligence
Angela Huyue Zhang · 2024
Closest in time.
State of ai safety in china spring 2024
Jason Zhou, Kwan Yee Ng, and Brian Tse · 2024
Closest in time.