Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), a large number of machine learning models have been developed to assist programming tasks including the generation of program code from natural language input.
R. Balzer, “A 15 year perspective on automatic programming,” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Zhu and L. Jin, “A knowledge-based system to synthesize FP programs from examples,” in Proc. of the 4th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 1989)
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu, “BLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation,” in Proc. of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chin-Yew Lin, “ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries,” in Text Summarization Branches Out
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Banerjee and A. Lavie, “METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments,” in Proc. of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Denkowski and A. Lavie, “Meteor universal: Language specific translation evaluation for any target language,” in Proc. of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Popović, “Chrf: character n-gram F-score for automatic MT evaluation,” in Proc. of the 10th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vaswani, et al., “Attention is all you need,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Iyer, I. Konstas, A. Cheung, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Mapping Language to Code in Programmatic Context,” in Proc. of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Kulal. et al., “Spoc: Search-based pseudocode to code,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Zhao, L. Zhang, and S. Yan, “A survey on research of code comment auto generation,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Agashe, S. Iyer, and L. Zettlemoyer, “JuICe: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Dataset for Open Domain Context-based Code Generation,” in Proc. of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and The 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Tran, et al., “Does BLEU score work for code migration?” in Proc. of IEEE/ACM 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Ren, et al., “CodeBLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of code synthesis,” CoRR 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Black, et al., “GPT-Neo: Large scale autoregressive language modeling with Mesh-Tensorflow,” 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Wang and A. Komatsuzaki, “GPT-J-6B: A 6 billion parameter autoregressive language model,” 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Chen, et al., “Evaluating large language models trained on code,” arXiv:2107.03374
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Austin, et al., “Program synthesis with large language models,” arXiv:2108.07732
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Lai, et al., “DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generation,” in Proc. of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Evtikhiev, E. Bogomolov, Y. Sokolov, and T. Bryksin, “Out of the BLEU: how should we assess quality of the code generation models?,” Journal of Systems and Software
2023
Later among the works it cites.
B. Marr, “How Generative AI Will Change The Jobs Of Computer Programmers And Software Engineers, ” FORBES, INNOVATION, ENTERPRISE TECH
2024
Closest in time.
A. Odeh, N. Odeh, and A. S. Mohammed, “A Comparative Review of AI Techniques for Automated Code Generation in Software Development: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions,” TEM Journal
2024
Closest in time.
C.Y. Su and C. McMillan, “Distilled GPT for source code summarization,” Automated Software Engineering
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Dehaerne, et al., “Code generation using machine learning: A systematic review,” IEEE Access
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
F. F. Xu, B. Vasilescu, and G. Neubig, “In-IDE code generation from natural language: Promise and challenges,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Wan, et al., “Deep Learning for Code Intelligence: Survey, Benchmark and Toolkit,” ACM Computing Surveys
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. L. Espejel, et al., “A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art methods for Java code generation from natural language text,” Natural Language Processing Journal
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Li, et al., “StarCoder: may the source be with you!,” arXiv: 2305.06161
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Nijkamp, et al., “Codegen: An open large language model for code with multi-turn program synthesis,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
L. B. Allal, et al., “SantaCoder: don’t reach for the stars!,” arXiv: 2301.03988
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Closest in time.
P. Naik, S. Nelaballi, V.S. Pusuluri, and D.K. Kim, “Deep learning-based code refactoring: A review of current knowledge,” Journal of Computer Information Systems
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
S. Ajorloo, et al., “A systematic review of machine learning methods in software testing,” Applied Soft Computing
2024
Closest in time.
D.M. Zapkus and A. Slotkienė, “Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models: A Systematic Literature Review,” Vilnius University Open Series
2024
Closest in time.
Gemini Team Google, “Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models,” arXiv:2312.11805
2024
Closest in time.
H. Yu, et al., “CoderEval: A Benchmark of Pragmatic Code Generation with Generative Pre-trained Models,” In Proc. of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
A. Ziegler, et al., “Measuring GitHub Copilot’s Impact on Productivity,” Communications of the ACM
2024
Closest in time.