Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
AI is anticipated to enhance human decision-making in high-stakes domains like aviation, but adoption is often hindered by challenges such as inappropriate reliance and poor alignment with users' decision-making.
Paradigms for intelligent decision support. In Intelligent Decision Support in Process Environments (NATO ASI Series, Vol. 21) . Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, San Miniato, Italy, 153–173
David D. Woods. 1986 · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
FOR-DEC - A prescriptive model for aeronautical decision making. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the European Association for Aviation Psychology (EAAP) . Avebury Aviation, Dublin, Ireland, 17–23
Hans-Jürgen Hörmann. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brittleness in the design of cooperative problem-solving systems: the effects on user performance
P.J. Smith, C.E. McCoy, and C. Layton. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation
Robert L. Helmreich, Ashleigh C. Merritt, and John A. Wilhelm. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information
John M. McGuirl and Nadine B. Sarter. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Designing for appropriation. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers (BCS-HCI ’07, Vol. 2) . BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Lancaster, UK, 27–30
Alan Dix. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
A human-centred design agenda for the development of single crew operated commercial aircraft
Don Harris. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Human error and commercial aviation accidents: an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system
Scott Shappell, Cristy Detwiler, Kali Holcomb, Carla Hackworth, Albert Boquet, and Douglas A. Wiegmann. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
The role of explanations on trust and reliance in clinical decision support systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI 2015) . IEEE, Dallas, TX, USA, 160–169
Adrian Bussone, Simone Stumpf, and Dympna O’Sullivan. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err
Berkeley J. Dietvorst, Joseph P. Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Principles of explanatory debugging to personalize interactive machine learning. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’15) . Association for Computing Machinery, Atlanta, GA, USA, 126–137
Todd Kulesza, Margaret Burnett, Weng-Keen Wong, and Simone Stumpf. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Analysing Data
Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Investigating the heart pump implant decision process: opportunities for decision support tools to help. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16) . ACM, San Jose, CA, USA, 4477–4488
Qian Yang, John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, Lisa Carey, and James F. Antaki. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Understanding algorithm aversion: when is advice from automation discounted?
Andrew Prahl and Lyn Van Swol. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Acting on analytics: accuracy, precision, interpretation, and performativity
Jeanette Blomberg, Aly Megahed, and Ray Strong. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A review of user interface design for interactive machine learning
John J. Dudley and Per Ola Kristensson. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artificial intelligence in healthcare
Kun-Hsing Yu, Andrew L. Beam, and Isaac S. Kohane. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Human-centered tools for coping with imperfect algorithms during medical decision-making. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19) . ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 4:1–4:14
Carrie J. Cai, Martin C. Stumpe, Michael Terry, Emily Reif, Narayan Hegde, Jason Hipp, Been Kim, Daniel Smilkov, Martin Wattenberg, Fernanda Viegas, and Greg S. Corrado. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Task-dependent algorithm aversion
Noah Castelo, Maarten W. Bos, and Donald R. Lehmann. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
The impact of placebic explanations on trust in intelligent systems. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’19) . ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, LBW0243:1–LBW0243:6
Malin Eiband, Daniel Buschek, Alexander Kremer, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
The principles and limits of algorithm-in-the-loop decision making
Ben Green and Yiling Chen. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
On human predictions with explanations and predictions of machine learning models: a case study on deception detection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’19) . ACM, Atlanta, GA, USA, 29–38
Vivian Lai and Chenhao Tan. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A slow algorithm improves users’ assessments of the algorithm’s accuracy
Joon Sung Park, Rick Barber, Alex Kirlik, and Karrie Karahalios. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artificial intelligence for law enforcement: challenges and opportunities
Stephan Raaijmakers. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artificial intelligence tool penetration in business: adoption, challenges and fears. In Knowledge Management in Organizations (KMO 2019) . Springer International Publishing, Zamora, Spain, 259–270
Stephan Schlögl, Claudia Postulka, Reinhard Bernsteiner, and Christian Ploder. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Designing theory-driven user-centric explainable AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19) . ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 601:1–601:15
Danding Wang, Qian Yang, Ashraf Abdul, and Brian Y. Lim. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Unremarkable AI: fitting intelligent decision support into critical, clinical decision-making processes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19) . ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 238:1–238:11
Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, and John Zimmerman. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
"You have to piece the puzzle together": implications for designing decision support in intensive care. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20) . ACM, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 1509–1522
Annika Kaltenhauser, Verena Rheinstädter, Andreas Butz, and Dieter P. Wallach. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Calibrating human-AI collaboration: impact of risk, ambiguity and transparency on algorithmic bias. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction (CD-MAKE 2020) . Springer International Publishing, Dublin, Ireland, 431–449
Do people engage cognitively with AI? Impact of AI assistance on incidental learning. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’22) . ACM, Helsinki, Finland, 794–806
Krzysztof Z. Gajos and Lena Mamykina. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Improving human-AI partnerships in child welfare: understanding worker practices, challenges, and desires for algorithmic decision support. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22) . ACM, New Orleans, LA, USA, 52:1–52:18
Anna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Hao-Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton, Yanghuidi Cheng, Diana Qing, Adam Perer, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Haiyi Zhu, and Kenneth Holstein. 2022a · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
A human-capabilities orientation for human-AI interaction design. In Virtual Workshop on Human-Centered AI Workshop at NeurIPS (HCAI @ NeurIPS ’22) . Virtual Event, USA, 1–5
Sean Koon. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Deciding fast and slow: the role of cognitive biases in AI-assisted decision-making
Charvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei, Kush R. Varshney, Amit Dhurandhar, and Richard Tomsett. 2022 · 2022
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Philipp Schmidt and Felix Biessmann. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Design lessons from AI’s two grand goals: human emulation and useful applications
Ben Shneiderman. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
No explainability without accountability: an empirical study of explanations and feedback in interactive ML. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20) . Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA, 497:1–497:13
Alison Smith-Renner, Ron Fan, Melissa Birchfield, Tongshuang Wu, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Daniel S. Weld, and Leah Findlater. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Artificial intelligence in medicine: chances and challenges for wide clinical adoption
Julian Varghese. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in AI-assisted decision making. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’20) . ACM, Barcelona, Spain, 295–305
Yunfeng Zhang, Q. Vera Liao, and Rachel K. E. Bellamy. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Does the whole exceed its parts? The effect of AI explanations on complementary team performance. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21) . ACM, Yokohama, Japan, 81:1–81:16
Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel Weld. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
To trust or to think: cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making
Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
The need to move away from agential-AI: empirical investigations, useful concepts and open issues
Federico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, and Carla Simone. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Expanding explainability: towards social transparency in AI systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21) . ACM, Yokohama, Japan, 82:1–82:19
Upol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael Muller, Mark O. Riedl, and Justin D. Weisz. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
When confidence meets accuracy: exploring the effects of multiple performance indicators on trust in machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22) . Association for Computing Machinery, New Orleans, LA, USA, 535:1–535:14
Amy Rechkemmer and Ming Yin. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Methods and measures to evaluate technologies that influence aviator decision making and situation awareness
Emilie Roth, Devorah Klein, Christen Sushereba, Katie Ernst, and Lauren Militello. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
“If I had all the time in the world”: ophthalmologists’ perceptions of anchoring bias mitigation in clinical AI support. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23) . ACM, Hamburg, Germany, 16:1–16:14
Anne Kathrine Petersen Bach, Trine Munch Nørgaard, Jens Christian Brok, and Niels Van Berkel. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Healthcare AI treatment decision support: design principles to enhance clinician adoption and trust. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23) . ACM, Hamburg, Germany, 15:1–15:19
Eleanor R. Burgess, Ivana Jankovic, Melissa Austin, Nancy Cai, Adela Kapuścińska, Suzanne Currie, J. Marc Overhage, Erika S Poole, and Jofish Kaye. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Overcoming algorithm aversion: a comparison between process and outcome control. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23) . ACM, Hamburg, Germany, 756:1–756:27
Lingwei Cheng and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2.0: A human-centric approach to AI in aviation
EASA. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Augmenting pathologists with NaviPath: design and evaluation of a human-AI collaborative navigation system. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23) . ACM, Hamburg, Germany, 349:1–349:19
Hongyan Gu, Chunxu Yang, Mohammad Haeri, Jing Wang, Shirley Tang, Wenzhong Yan, Shujin He, Christopher Kazu Williams, Shino Magaki, and Xiang ’Anthony’ Chen. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
How stated accuracy of an AI system and analogies to explain accuracy affect human reliance on the system
Gaole He, Stefan Buijsman, and Ujwal Gadiraju. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Human-AI collaboration: the effect of AI delegation on human task performance and task satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’23) . ACM, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 453–463
Patrick Hemmer, Monika Westphal, Max Schemmer, Sebastian Vetter, Michael Vössing, and Gerhard Satzger. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Towards a science of human-AI decision making: an overview of design space in empirical human-subject studies. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’23) . ACM, Chicago, IL, USA, 1369–1385
Vivian Lai, Chacha Chen, Alison Smith-Renner, Q. Vera Liao, and Chenhao Tan. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Diagrammatization: Rationalizing with diagrammatic AI explanations for abductive-deductive reasoning on hypotheses
Brian Y. Lim, Joseph P. Cahaly, Chester Y. F. Sng, and Adam Chew. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Explainable AI is dead, long live explainable AI! Hypothesis-driven decision support using evaluative AI. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’23) . ACM, Chicago, IL, USA, 333–342
Tim Miller. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding uncertainty: how lay decision-makers perceive and interpret uncertainty in human-AI decision making. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’23) . ACM, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 379–396
Snehal Prabhudesai, Leyao Yang, Sumit Asthana, Xun Huan, Q. Vera Liao, and Nikola Banovic. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Appropriate reliance on AI advice: conceptualization and the effect of explanations. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’23) . ACM, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 410–422
Max Schemmer, Niklas Kuehl, Carina Benz, Andrea Bartos, and Gerhard Satzger. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Ignore, trust, or negotiate: understanding clinician acceptance of AI-based treatment recommendations in health care. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23) . ACM, Hamburg, Germany, 754:1–754:18
Venkatesh Sivaraman, Leigh A. Bukowski, Joel Levin, Jeremy M. Kahn, and Adam Perer. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Explanations can reduce overreliance on AI systems during decision-making
Helena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Tobias Gerstenberg, Michael S. Bernstein, and Ranjay Krishna. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Intelligent Pilot Advisory System: The journey from ideation to an early system design of an AI-based decision support system for airline flight decks. In Human Factors in Transportation (AHFE 2023, Vol. 95) . AHFE Open Acces, San Francisco, CA, USA, 589–597
Jakob Würfel, Boris Djartov, Anne Papenfuß, and Matthias Wies. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Harnessing biomedical literature to calibrate clinicians’ trust in AI decision support systems. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23) . ACM, Hamburg, Germany, 14:1–14:14
Qian Yang, Yuexing Hao, Kexin Quan, Stephen Yang, Yiran Zhao, Volodymyr Kuleshov, and Fei Wang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Resilience through appropriation: pilots’ view on complex decision support. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’23) . ACM, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 397–409
Zelun Tony Zhang, Cara Storath, Yuanting Liu, and Andreas Butz. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
In search of verifiability: Explanations rarely enable complementary performance in AI-advised decision making
Raymond Fok and Daniel S. Weld. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Rethinking human-AI collaboration in complex medical decision making: a case study in sepsis diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24) . ACM, Honolulu, HI, USA, 445:1–445:18
Shao Zhang, Jianing Yu, Xuhai Xu, Changchang Yin, Yuxuan Lu, Bingsheng Yao, Melanie Tory, Lace M. Padilla, Jeffrey Caterino, Ping Zhang, and Dakuo Wang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.