Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
When making decisions under uncertainty, individuals often deviate from rational behavior, which can be evaluated across three dimensions: risk preference, probability weighting, and loss aversion.
Kai-Ineman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
Binswanger, H. P. (1981). Attitudes toward risk: Theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. The Economic Journal
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review , American Economic Association
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., & others. (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., & others. (2008). Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Harrison, G. W., & Rutström, E. E. (2009). Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral. Experimental Economics
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., & others. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Von Gaudecker, H.-M., Van Soest, A., & Wengström, E. (2011). Heterogeneity in risky choice behavior in a broad population. American Economic Review
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Liu, E. M. (2013). Time to change what to sow: Risk preferences and technology adoption decisions of cotton farmers in China. Review of Economics and Statistics
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brown, T.B. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165 , 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Du, N., Huang, Y., Dai, A.M., Tong, S., Lepikhin, D., Xu, Y., Krikun, M., Zhou, Y., Yu, A.W., Firat, O., et al. Glam: Efficient scaling of language models with mixture-of-experts. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 5547–5569, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q.V., and Zhou, D. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:24824–24837, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Large language models are human-level prompt engineers
Zhou, Y., Muresanu, A.I., Han, Z., Paster, K., Pitis, S., Chan, H., and Ba, J · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Brand, J., Israeli, A., & Ngwe, D. (2023). Using gpt for market research. Available at SSRN 4395751
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Chen, Y., Liu, T. X., & others. (2023). The emergence of economic rationality of GPT. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Dillion, D., & Tandon, N. (2023). Can AI language models replace human participants? Trends in Cognitive Sciences
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Enis, M., & Hopkins, M. (2024). From LLM to NMT: Advancing Low-Resource Machine Translation with Claude. arXiv
2024
Closest in time.
Fan, C., Chen, J., Jin, Y., & He, H. (2024). Can large language models serve as rational players in game theory? a systematic analysis. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2024
Closest in time.
Harvel, N., Haiek, F. B., Ankolekar, A., & Brunner, D. J. (2024). Can LLMs Answer Investment Banking Questions? Using Domain-Tuned Functions to Improve LLM Performance on Knowledge-Intensive Analytical Tasks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series , 3, 125–133
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Guo, F. (2023). GPT agents in game theory experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05516
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Horton, J. J. (2023). Large language models as simulated economic agents: What can we learn from homo silicus? National Bureau of Economic Research
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Qiu, L., Singh, P. V., & Srinivasan, K. (2023). How Much Should We Trust LLM Results for Marketing Research? Available at SSRN 4526072
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Rao, A., Kim, J., & others. (2023). Evaluating ChatGPT as an adjunct for radiologic decision-making. MedRxiv
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Wu, T., He, S., & others. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Closest in time.
Ko, H., & Lee, J. (2024). Can ChatGPT improve investment decisions? From a portfolio management perspective. Finance Research Letters
2024
Closest in time.
Leng, Y. (2024). Can LLMs Mimic Human-Like Mental Accounting and Behavioral Biases? Available at SSRN 4705130
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Malkiel, I., Alon, U., & others. (2024). SEGLLM: Topic-Oriented Call Segmentation Via LLM-Based Conversation Synthesis. In ICASSP
2024
Closest in time.
Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, & others. (2024). Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models. arXiv
2024
Closest in time.
WorldBank (2024). World Development Indicators. WorldBank Dataset
2024
Closest in time.
Ziems, C., Held, W., Shaikh, O., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., and Yang, D. Can large language models transform computational social science? Computational Linguistics , 50(1):237–291, 2024
2024
Closest in time.